The number on your invoice is probably not your problem
You have the skills. You have shipped production code that would get you an interview at any US company if a human ever saw it. But you are not getting calls from US companies, or the calls you get stall out at a rate that does not feel right for your experience level.
That gap is not about your English. It is not about your timezone. It is a tax. A probability tax. And it has three components that stack silently against you.
Deduction 1: The anchor
When a recruiter in Austin or Seattle asks "what are you looking for?", most Central European engineers answer with a number they calculated from the Prague or Bratislava market. Maybe they bumped it up 20% to feel ambitious. That number still lands in the US context as a signal, not a salary expectation. The signal it sends is: this person does not know what they replace.
A senior backend engineer in a US hub costs a company far more than their base salary once you add benefits, payroll taxes, and office overhead. A remote engineer who could replace that seat, but names a number anchored to their local market, has just told the hiring manager something unintended: either the candidate does not understand the market, or there is a catch. Neither reading helps you.
The anchor is not humility. It is misfiring information.
Deduction 2: The filter
Remote tech roles now receive many times the applications of on-site roles. That means the resume screen is brutal before any human judgment enters the picture. ATS systems, keyword matching, and the first ten-second skim by a recruiter working through hundreds of open applications, these are not neutral processes.
Central European resumes tend to have structural habits that cost them in this filter. Education listed before experience. A long profile summary that reads like a LinkedIn bio. Project descriptions that describe technology used rather than outcomes delivered. A US recruiter is scanning for evidence that you solved a problem at scale. If that evidence is buried or formatted in a way that feels foreign, you are out before the senior engineer on the team ever sees your name.
This is not unfair. It is a filter you can understand and work with once you know it exists.
Deduction 3: The risk read
US tech companies that are not already operating across borders have a real and specific fear: timezone gaps that slow pull requests, legal ambiguity around contracts, the question of what happens if there is a compliance issue in a country their legal team has never dealt with. Some of that fear is irrational. Some of it is legitimate.
If your application materials, your GitHub, your communication style, and your interview behavior do not actively address that fear, the hiring manager's brain fills in the blank conservatively. You get read as a risk even when you are not one.
Companies like GitLab operate across 60 or more countries. Zapier has more than 800 people across 40. These companies have solved the infrastructure problem of international remote hiring. But mid-size US product companies that have not done it before need more from you than competence. They need their fear resolved.
Why each deduction compounds the others
Here is the brutal math. If the anchor misreads you, fewer conversations start. If the filter removes you, the conversations that would have started never do. If the risk read kills the late-stage call, the interviews that made it through do not convert.
None of these three things is about your ability to write good code. You could be the best distributed systems engineer your prospective employer has ever seen, and all three deductions could still apply simultaneously.
That is what makes it a tax on probability rather than a tax on skill. Skill is table stakes. The tax is everything that sits between your skill and a US company's willingness to bet on you.
This is a solvable problem
The three deductions are not permanent. The anchor problem has a fix once you understand what a US senior role actually costs the company. The filter problem has a fix once you understand what signal US recruiters are scanning for. The risk read problem has a fix once you understand what specific fears you need to resolve, and how early in the process to resolve them.
None of the fixes require you to pretend to be American or to undersell your European roots. The engineers from Central Europe who are working for US companies right now, on US compensation, are not exceptional outliers. They just stopped paying the tax.
Written by Jerry Kasem, cofounder of CzechDevUSA. I help senior engineers in Central Europe get seen by US companies, and I help US teams hire them without the markup or the hiring risk. I write about the cross-border hiring wall on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/czechdevusa. The two free tools for developers are in the first comment.
Top comments (0)