Press enter or click to view image in full size
The AI gold rush is in full swing. Feeds are flooded with demos, wrappers, pitch decks, and agents that promise to do everything until they don’t. Founders are sprinting to “build fast and get acquired” while NVIDIA quietly collects rent like a GPU landlord.
The hype is real, but so is the drop-off. Most of what’s launching today? Dead by next year.
This isn’t another doomer take. I’m a dev. I build stuff. But we need to talk honestly about why the majority of these AI startups will fail and what separates the ones that actually survive.
What you’ll get in this article:
- The gold rush mindset Why everyone’s building the same thing and thinks it’s different
- The hidden costs no one talks about GPU bills, model scaling, and cloud inferno
- Everyone’s using the same backend Why GPT-wrappers aren’t businesses
- Your users don’t love your tool they love the novelty The retention cliff
- Who actually survives? The dev-first, boring, useful tools that win
- Final thoughts and real resources How to build something that lasts
The gold rush mindset
It feels like every founder on X (formerly Twitter) is either launching an AI startup, pitching one, or just got funded for something that sounds suspiciously like “ChatGPT but with more buttons.”
You scroll your feed and it’s:
“AI-powered job matcher”
“AI-driven resume writer”
“Auto slide deck generator”
“We’re the Notion of AI agents”
“Uber for AI therapists using GPT-4”
Sound familiar? Yeah, it’s all wrappers.
Welcome to the AI gold rush where everyone’s convinced they’ve found a new El Dorado, but most of them are digging in the same patch of dirt using the same rented shovel (read: GPT-4 API).
The problem? In a real gold rush, the people who got rich weren’t the miners they were the ones selling pickaxes. Today, NVIDIA, AWS, and OpenAI are the ones selling GPU pickaxes, and the rest of us are just tripping over each other building slide deck bots with new UI themes.
And no, slapping “personalized” or “for Gen Z” on your pitch doesn’t make it a moat.
Real talk: everyone’s building the same thing
Take a weekend, go on Product Hunt, and search for “AI + [X]”. You’ll see it:
- 15 different PDF-to-slide apps
- 10 AI note-takers for meetings
- Countless AI email reply assistants
- Dozens of “autonomous agents” that can’t even book a flight without freezing
They all talk big about “revolutionizing X with AI,” but the backend is always the same an API call to OpenAI, maybe some LangChain thrown in, and a splash of Tailwind.
What you’re seeing is not innovation. It’s interface shuffling.
The result? A giant pile of startups chasing novelty instead of solving actual problems. And the truth is: novelty doesn’t scale. Retention kills wrappers, not launch hype.
The hidden costs no one talks about
Let’s get one thing straight: AI might feel like magic on the frontend, but under the hood, it’s just math, models, and expensive infrastructure. And no one’s talking enough about that last part.
You’re not just building an app you’re building a GPU furnace. And it eats cash.
Every user you get costs you
Founders love to brag about traction.
“We hit 10K users this week!”
Cool. If you’re using OpenAI’s GPT-4 Turbo or Claude 3.5 with real-time responses, you’re now staring down a terrifying line item on your AWS bill.
- Inference at scale is not cheap
- Image/audio processing? Even worse
- Custom model hosting? Hope you raised a round, buddy
You think usage is growth. Your burn rate disagrees.
NVIDIA is the real king here
If you haven’t tried renting an A100 or H100 recently, prepare for pain.
GPU prices are sky high, capacity is limited, and cloud providers add their own tax. You’ll get rate-limited before you get product-market fit.
It’s not just OpenAI’s fault. Everyone’s scrambling for compute. Which means unless you’re plugged into a hyperscaler (and even if you are), you’re at the mercy of NVIDIA’s silicon supply chain.
And NVIDIA? They don’t care if your agent can write a poem in pirate voice.
The “open-source will save us” myth
You might say, “I’ll just switch to open-source models like Mixtral, LLaMA, or Grok-1.” Sure. But then you’re back to:
- Renting GPUs (still expensive)
- Running inference 24/7
- Maintaining infra you don’t understand
- Getting dunked on in Hacker News when it crashes
Unless your team is the infra team, you’ll end up either overspending, underperforming, or both.
Press enter or click to view image in full size
This is why most AI startups can’t scale: their infra doesn’t scale profitably, and users don’t stick around long enough to justify the spend.
It’s not a tech problem. It’s a brutal economic one.
Everyone’s using the same backend
Here’s the dirty secret about most AI startups right now: they’re all built on the same stack.
Like, literally the same.
It’s not just similar ideas it’s the same APIs, the same frameworks, and sometimes, the same bugs.
You peel back the glossy landing page and you’ll find the usual suspects:
- OpenAI’s GPT-4 Turbo
- Anthropic’s Claude
- A pinch of LangChain
- Some Firebase/Auth0
- Tailwind UI clone #87
And that’s it. The only “innovation” is which template someone used on Webflow.
Wrappers are not a moat
There’s a name for this kind of product: a wrapper.
An app that adds a thin layer of UI/UX on top of someone else’s language model and calls it a startup.
Sure, you can tweak the prompt, segment the users, add some nice feedback UI but at the end of the day, if OpenAI changes their API, your entire value prop might vanish overnight.
Remember when OpenAI added built-in memory to ChatGPT?
Half the “AI note-taking” apps died in 24 hours.
You don’t own the model.
You don’t own the core logic.
You don’t even own the roadmap.
You’re just renting an API and hoping they don’t launch your startup as a feature.
Devs can rebuild most of this in a weekend
There’s a reason people joke about “weekend GPT apps.” It’s not an insult it’s just true.
Most AI tools out there right now are:
- One prompt
- One input field
- One result screen
- Maybe a Stripe paywall
A solid dev could ship 90% of these MVPs in 2–3 days. That’s not a startup. That’s a demo with a landing page.
Unless you’re doing heavy fine-tuning, multimodal workflows, or deep integrations into actual workflows (think: Zapier, Figma, VS Code, Notion plugins), you’re walking around with zero defensibility.
Press enter or click to view image in full size
This is why the “AI startup” gold rush is so fragile.
Everyone’s using the same weapon just painting it a different color.
Unless you’re doing something fundamentally different under the hood, your time is limited. Either OpenAI will ship your feature, or another dev will ship it cheaper.
Users don’t love your tool they love the novelty
Early traction feels great people are tweeting your demo, upvoting it on Product Hunt, dropping fire emojis in your Discord.
But here’s the truth no one puts on a pitch deck:
They’re not loyal. They’re curious.
Most users don’t need your AI tool. They’re just bored on a Tuesday and want to see what the latest ChatGPT-powered gimmick looks like.
1,000 users isn’t product-market fit
It’s dopamine.
The AI wave created this weird moment where every tool gets a temporary spotlight. But that doesn’t mean they’re sticky.
Ask yourself:
- Are people coming back?
- Are they using it daily/weekly?
- Are they telling others without being prompted?
If not, what you have isn’t a product it’s a tour.
And in this tour economy, users hop from tool to tool like they’re trying snacks at Costco. They don’t remember what they just clicked, and they’re not opening their wallet unless your app solves a real workflow pain.
OpenAI can kill your feature in one update
This part hurts, but it’s real.
Let’s say you build a sleek AI that:
- Summarizes YouTube videos
- Or generates meeting notes
- Or translates PDFs in context
Awesome. Until OpenAI launches it natively in ChatGPT or through a system message update.
Now your entire startup is a tab in a sidebar.
Remember when people were building AI cover letter generators? Gone.
People selling AI email helpers? Toast.
AI itinerary planners? GPT-4 with browsing can now do that better.
You’re not competing with other startups. You’re competing with the roadmaps of model providers who don’t care about your existence.
Press enter or click to view image in full size
The takeaway?
You’re not just fighting for user attention. You’re fighting novelty fatigue.
In the end, the AI startup that wins isn’t the most viral. It’s the one that quietly becomes part of someone’s workflow and they forget it’s even “AI.”
Who actually survives?
Alright, enough doomscrolling let’s talk about the ones that won’t die by next year.
Some AI startups will survive this wave. A few will thrive. But they all have one thing in common:
They’re not just “using AI.” They’re solving actual, boring, unsexy problems.
1. They’re building real workflows, not just interfaces
The successful ones don’t slap a GPT-4 prompt onto a textbox and call it a business. They build around:
- Deep integrations (Slack, Notion, Chrome, VS Code
- Enterprise-grade infra (auth, user management, fine-tuned UX)
- Clear ROI for users (time saved, errors reduced, money made)
They’re AI-powered, not AI-dependent.
2. They treat AI like a component not a product
Think of AI as a database or search engine it’s a tool, not the whole value prop.
Look at Perplexity: it’s not just a chatbot. It’s search, citations, inline sources, browsing all wrapped into something that solves a real problem: “I want facts, not vibes.”
Or LangChain: not flashy. But it powers 100s of dev tools under the hood, and lets engineers go beyond simple prompting into full-on LLM workflows.
Or RunPod: GPU infrastructure as a service, for people who don’t want to give up their life savings to AWS every month.
These companies aren’t just riding the AI wave they’re infrastructure.
Which means they get stronger as others launch, fail, and try again.
3. They build with developers in mind
Here’s the secret weapon: developer love.
If devs trust your tool, adopt it, and build on top of it, you’re building compound interest into your business.
Think:
- Clear docs
- Great APIs
- Fast onboarding
- OSS components
- No BS billing
Compare that to most wrapper startups with no SDKs, weird onboarding flows, and mystery pricing tiers that say “Contact Sales.”
One of these is a tool. The other is a toy.
Press enter or click to view image in full size
So who survives?
Not the loudest. Not the fastest. But the most useful.
The ones who:
- Build quietly
- Solve real problems
- Don’t treat OpenAI like a moat
- Focus on infra, retention, and dev happiness
That’s what wins long-term not another “AI assistant for bedtime stories with emojis.”
Conclusion: AI isn’t the product. It’s just the engine.
Here’s the brutal truth: most AI startups aren’t failing because of bad ideas.
They’re failing because they never stopped to ask: “Is this actually needed?”
They built fast.
They built on rented APIs.
They built for novelty, not utility.
And then they were shocked when users bounced and GPU bills didn’t.
AI is powerful. But it’s not a moat. Not a business model. Not a shortcut to product-market fit.
Want to build something that survives?
Start with problems, not hype.
Start with pain points, not pitch decks.
Start with boring things people actually need and make them 10x better using AI behind the scenes.
And if you’re building:
- Don’t chase virality
- Build for depth
- Treat your stack like a toolbox, not a religion
- Make sure your infra won’t bankrupt you before your users even return
Most of this AI wave is noise. But underneath it, the real stuff is happening.
Quietly. Open-source. Developer-first.
That’s where the real gold is.
Now go build something useful and skip the wrapper.
Helpful links & resources for real builders
- LangChain GitHub for actual LLM workflows
- RunPod.io GPU infra that doesn’t destroy your runway
- Perplexity.ai search that respects your brain
- OpenAI pricing plan your burn before you burn out
- Why wrapper startups fail (Ben’s Bites)
- SaaS retention benchmarks (Lenny’s Newsletter)
That’s it. You made it.
Just remember: in the end, the best AI startup is the one that people use, pay for, and don’t even realize is using AI under the hood.
Press enter or click to view image in full size
Top comments (0)