The landscape of AI coding assistants is evolving rapidly, and developers now have several mature options.
The most capable system today is OpenAI’s ChatGPT (GPT-4). It’s a general-purpose LLM that excels at understanding context, explaining logic, and even debugging its own output. In side-by-side tests, ChatGPT consistently produces high-quality code.
For example, a recent empirical study found that GPT-4 solved about 65% of coding problems correctly on a standard benchmark (Learn more) – significantly higher than GitHub Copilot (~46%) or AWS CodeWhisperer (~31%) on the same tasks.
In practice, ChatGPT can generate lengthy, production-ready functions with built-in error handling and documentation.
eWeek reports that ChatGPT “produces detailed, clean, and production-ready code with robust error handling” (Learn more), and it also excels at explaining and refactoring code for beginners.
Crucially for automation, ChatGPT is accessible via the OpenAI API (including the new GPT-4 Turbo model), so you can integrate it into build pipelines, bots or other systems. OpenAI even offers a pay-as-you-go API alongside its ChatGPT interface. (There is a generous free tier – essentially unlimited usage at lower quality – and a “Plus” plan for \$20/mo to get the fastest GPT-4 service (Learn more).)
In short, ChatGPT/GPT-4 is extremely popular and versatile: by late 2023 it had roughly 100 million weekly users (Learn more) (including ~2 million developers in Fortune 500 companies (Learn more)), and its broad language support (dozens of languages) means it can handle virtually any code task.
Its one drawback is cost: heavy use of the GPT-4 API can add up, and you must always review outputs for subtle errors, since no AI is 100% correct.
GitHub Copilot is another leading choice, especially for day-to-day coding inside an IDE.
Copilot (built on OpenAI Codex/GPT) plugs directly into editors like VS Code, JetBrains IDEs or Neovim and offers real-time, context-aware completions. It shines on boilerplate and repetitive code – giving you full-line or block suggestions as you type.
In Rohit Maurya’s hands-on tests, “Copilot shines at autocomplete and inline code suggestions… [filling in] boilerplate and repetitive code” (Learn more). eWeek similarly notes that Copilot provides “concise, context-aware, high-quality outputs” and even automated refactorings to clean up code (Learn more) (Learn more).
In practice, Copilot is extremely popular among developers – by 2025 it reportedly had on the order of 15 million users worldwide (Learn more) and is used by most big companies.
It requires minimal setup (just an IDE plugin), has a modest cost (\$10/month per user with unlimited completions) (Learn more), and is excellent for quickly generating code patterns and snippets.
However, Copilot’s scope is narrower.
It does not offer a standalone API or chat interface – it only runs inside supported editor environments. It also doesn’t explain its suggestions (no natural-language reasoning), and it can sometimes autocomplete into bugs with little warning.
eWeek’s comparison observes that Copilot’s error handling is limited and it “lacks detailed explanations” for beginners (Learn more).
In benchmarks, Copilot solved fewer problems than GPT-4 (Learn more).
In short, Copilot is a fantastic, inexpensive inline assistant for coding—but if you need to generate code outside an IDE or ask follow-up questions in natural language, it falls short.
Amazon CodeWhisperer is AWS’s answer to Copilot. It’s free for individual developers (with up to 50 free security scans per month) and \$19/user/month for teams (Learn more).
CodeWhisperer integrates with AWS tools and IDE plugins (e.g. Cloud9, Lambda console, AWS-IDE extensions) to suggest code snippets. It supports several popular languages (Python, Java, JavaScript, TypeScript, C#, etc. (Learn more)) and even offers built-in security scanning of the generated code (Learn more) – a feature the others lack. This makes it attractive to AWS-centric teams.
In use, CodeWhisperer generally works best when writing AWS-related code, and it “integrates well with cloud workflows and supports multiple languages,” per one developer’s tests (Learn more).
On the downside, CodeWhisperer’s code suggestions tend to be less polished. In tests it underperformed Copilot and ChatGPT on code accuracy, and Rohit Maurya found it “felt less polished than Copilot and ChatGPT” overall (Learn more).
It also does not offer a general user-facing API – you can only invoke it through AWS’s IDEs or CLI.
In summary, CodeWhisperer is very cheap (free) and useful if you develop on AWS, but it’s more specialized and less broadly capable than the others (Learn more) (Learn more).
Beyond those three, other AI coding tools exist. Tabnine (recently acquired by Codota) is a long-standing AI autocomplete assistant that can run locally or in the cloud, offering strong privacy (it won’t send your code to third parties).
Tabnine focuses on one-by-one code suggestions rather than full chat. It has free and paid tiers, but no conversational API.
Another option is Google’s Codey/Gemini via Vertex AI. Google Cloud’s Vertex AI now includes “Gemini” code models (sometimes called Codey) that support over 20 languages and even handle debugging and refactoring Learn more.
Google’s documentation highlights that “Gemini … not only generates code, but also helps with debugging and code explanation” across C++, Java, Python, etc. Learn more
These models can be accessed through Google’s generative AI Cloud API (Vertex AI), though they have their own pricing (typically pay-per-token) and are geared for Google’s ecosystem.
For teams on a tight budget, open-source code LLMs are worth a look.
Meta’s Code Llama (34B model) is publicly available and fine-tuned on 500+ billion tokens of code.
InfoQ notes it “outperformed all other open-source models and is comparable to ChatGPT” on code tasks (Learn more).
Amazon now even offers Code Llama via SageMaker JumpStart (one-click deployment) (Learn more), and its license permits commercial use.
Using Code Llama means hosting your own compute (or renting GPUs on AWS/Azure), but there is no per-call fee – so it can be very cost-effective at scale.
Similarly, BigCode’s StarCoder and other community models can generate code, though their performance usually lags behind GPT-4.
In practice, choosing the best AI tool depends on your needs:
ChatGPT (GPT-4)
GitHub Copilot
CodeWhisperer
Code Llama
Tabnine
- If accuracy and flexibility are the top priority, ChatGPT (GPT-4) is the leader. It can tackle complex tasks, explain itself, switch languages fluidly, and is accessible via an official API (free trial + pay-as-you-go) (Learn more). Its cost (~\$0.06 per 1K tokens for GPT-4) can add up, but overall it gives the most “human-like” coding help (Learn more).
- If you just want fast code completions inside your IDE, GitHub Copilot is hard to beat. It’s cheaper (\$10/user–month) (Learn more) and works immediately in VS Code / IntelliJ, generating contextually relevant lines of code (Learn more). However, it has no external API and limited dialogue ability.
- If you’re an AWS developer, CodeWhisperer is compelling. It’s free for individuals (Learn more), works well with AWS services, and even flags security issues (Learn more). Its generated code quality is a notch below the others (as seen in benchmarks (Learn more)), but for many cloud tasks it’s “a good option” (Learn more) and integrates into your deployment pipelines.
- For budget-conscious or privacy-specialized scenarios, open models like Code Llama or local instances of Tabnine can be used. These avoid subscription fees (though they require your own infrastructure cost) and can run entirely in-house.
Always review the output of any AI tool you pick. None of these tools are guaranteed “error-free” – even ChatGPT made mistakes in roughly one-third of test problems (Learn more).
In other words, consider AI assistants as highly skilled copilots, not infallible coders.
For production use, you’ll combine AI generation with testing and human oversight.
Bottom line: For most teams today, OpenAI’s ChatGPT/GPT-4 is the all-around best choice – it’s hugely popular, easy to integrate via API, and delivers the most reliable code on average (Learn more) (Learn more).
GitHub Copilot is a close second if cost or workflow fits better, and CodeWhisperer is the bargain pick for AWS shops. Checking around, nearly every developer tool now offers some AI, so it pays to try a few: compare how they handle your common tasks (e.g. writing functions, fixing bugs, generating docs), and see which errors or weird “hallucinations” crop up.
In the end, the ideal AI coding partner is one that your team vets and controls – but for pure performance and popularity, GPT-4 reigns supreme (Learn more) (Learn more).
Sources: Objective comparisons of ChatGPT (GPT-4), Copilot, CodeWhisperer and others (Learn more) (Learn more) (Learn more), along with official blogs and reviews from AWS, GitHub, and tech media (Learn more) (Learn more) (Learn more).
Top comments (0)