Imagine you want to predict a car’s mileage (miles per gallon, or mpg) using its specifications — things like horsepower, engine capacity, weight, and the number of cylinders.
The simplest way to approach this is to build a regression model with one predictor variable — say, horsepower — and see how it influences mileage. While this method might give you some insights, it oversimplifies the real-world scenario. Mileage is rarely determined by a single factor.
A more refined model would consider multiple predictors: horsepower, weight, engine displacement, transmission type, and more. This setup is called a multiple linear regression model, where several independent variables jointly predict a dependent variable (mileage, in this case).
But here’s the catch — what if one of those “independent” variables actually depends on another predictor? For example:
Mileage depends on horsepower and weight.
But horsepower itself might depend on engine displacement and the number of cylinders.
This interdependence makes the model more complex. That’s where path analysis steps in.
What Is Path Analysis?
Path analysis is an advanced statistical technique that extends multiple regression. It allows us to model complex relationships among variables — including cases where some independent variables influence others before affecting the final outcome.
You can think of it as a system of connected regressions. Rather than having a single layer of predictors, path analysis enables multi-level dependencies, where variables can be both predictors and outcomes simultaneously.
In simpler terms:
It helps visualize and estimate direct and indirect effects among variables.
It’s ideal for testing how a network of relationships influences an outcome.
Historically, path analysis was also called causal modeling. However, since statistical models alone can’t confirm causality, that term is rarely used now. Path analysis can disprove an assumed causal structure but cannot prove one.
Key Terminology
Path analysis uses slightly different terms from regression analysis:
Exogenous variables: These are external variables that are not influenced by any other variable in the model. They have arrows pointing outward but none coming inward.
Endogenous variables: These are influenced by other variables in the model. They have at least one incoming arrow.
In essence, exogenous = independent, and endogenous = dependent, but with more flexibility since variables can play both roles at different stages.
Each arrow in a path diagram represents a regression relationship, and the numbers along these arrows (called path coefficients) show the strength and direction of influence.
Assumptions of Path Analysis
Because path analysis is an extension of multiple regression, it carries similar assumptions:
Linearity: Relationships between variables are linear.
Continuity: Endogenous variables should be continuous (or ordinal with at least five categories).
No interaction effects: Variables are assumed to act independently unless interaction terms are explicitly modeled.
No correlation among disturbance terms: The error terms (residuals) for endogenous variables should not be correlated.
Violating these assumptions can lead to unreliable results.
Implementing Path Analysis in R
Let’s explore path analysis practically using R. We’ll start by creating a simple custom dataset to understand the concept and then apply it to the well-known mtcars dataset.
First, install and load the required packages:
install.packages("lavaan")
install.packages("OpenMx")
install.packages("semPlot")
install.packages("GGally")
install.packages("corrplot")
library(lavaan)
library(semPlot)
library(OpenMx)
library(GGally)
library(corrplot)
Example 1: Creating and Analyzing a Custom Dataset
We’ll simulate a small dataset to understand the relationships manually:
set.seed(11)
a <- 0.5
b <- 5
c <- 7
d <- 2.5
x1 <- rnorm(20, mean = 0, sd = 1)
x2 <- rnorm(20, mean = 0, sd = 1)
x3 <- runif(20, min = 2, max = 5)
Y <- a*x1 + b*x2
Z <- c*x3 + d*Y
data1 <- cbind(x1, x2, x3, Y, Z)
head(data1, 10)
Now, visualize correlations among these variables:
cor1 <- cor(data1)
corrplot(cor1, method = 'square')
You’ll likely observe that:
Y correlates strongly with x2,
Z correlates strongly with Y and x3,
x1 has a weaker effect.
Next, we’ll define a path model:
model1 <- '
Z ~ x1 + x2 + x3 + Y
Y ~ x1 + x2
'
fit1 <- cfa(model1, data = data1)
summary(fit1, fit.measures = TRUE, standardized = TRUE, rsquare = TRUE)
Sometimes you may see a convergence warning (especially with small samples). In larger datasets, this usually resolves.
To visualize the path diagram:
semPaths(fit1, "std", layout = "circle")
You’ll see arrows connecting variables, with path coefficients showing the strength of relationships. In this example, Z strongly depends on Y, and Y is largely influenced by x2 — matching our earlier intuition.
Example 2: Using the mtcars Dataset
Let’s apply the same approach to a real dataset available in R:
data2 <- mtcars
head(data2, 10)
We’ll model how different car features affect mileage (mpg) and how horsepower depends on other variables:
model2 <- '
mpg ~ hp + gear + cyl + disp + carb + am + wt
hp ~ cyl + disp + carb
'
fit2 <- cfa(model2, data = data2)
summary(fit2)
Interpreting the Output
From the regression results:
Weight (wt) is a significant negative predictor of mpg (heavier cars have lower mileage).
Displacement (disp) and carburetors (carb) significantly influence horsepower (hp).
Interestingly, horsepower itself does not significantly predict mpg after controlling for other factors.
Visualize the model:
semPaths(fit2, "std", "est", curveAdjacent = TRUE, style = "lisrel")
The path diagram makes it clear:
mpg is heavily influenced by wt,
hp is strongly influenced by disp and carb,
The link between hp and mpg is weak.
This graphical representation is what makes path analysis so powerful — it translates complex regression relationships into an intuitive visual structure.
Things to Keep in Mind
Model sensitivity: Path analysis is sensitive to variable selection. Excluding an important variable or adding an irrelevant one can drastically change results.
Not for model building: It’s primarily used to test predefined models, not to discover them. You should have a theoretical basis for why variables are linked.
Model fit matters: Always check goodness-of-fit indices (like Chi-square, RMSEA, or CFI) to ensure your model aligns with the data.
No causation guarantee: Path analysis shows associations, not proof of cause-and-effect.
Wrapping Up
Path analysis bridges the gap between multiple regression and more advanced structural equation modeling (SEM). It allows analysts and researchers to explore intricate systems of relationships without overcomplicating the model-building process.
In R, packages like lavaan and semPlot make it easy to perform and visualize these analyses. Once you get comfortable with basic path analysis, you can move into SEM, which adds latent (unobserved) variables into the mix — a natural next step.
Path analysis helps transform your statistical models from simple, one-directional predictions into dynamic, interconnected systems — offering a clearer, more realistic picture of how variables truly interact.
So, the next time you find your regression model too simplistic, consider adding some “paths” — your data might tell a richer story than you think.
At Perceptive Analytics, our mission is “to enable businesses to unlock value in data.” For over 20 years, we’ve partnered with more than 100 clients—from Fortune 500 companies to mid-sized firms—to solve complex data analytics challenges. We help organizations harness AI through our AI consulting in Philadelphia and AI consulting in San Diego services, enabling smarter automation, forecasting, and decision-making. Our experienced Excel VBA programmers in Rochester support teams with data automation and analytics solutions that boost efficiency. We turn data into strategic insight and would love to talk to you. Do reach out to us.
Top comments (0)