I am Building the AI Workflow Tool I Wished Existed for the Past Two Years

Last Tuesday I caught myself doing this:

1. Open ChatGPT, paste a draft email, ask Claude to "make this less corporate."

2. Copy the result into Claude, ask "now give me three subject line options."

3. Take one of those subject lines back into ChatGPT, ask "now rewrite this email as if the subject line is the opening sentence."

4. Get distracted by a Slack notification.

5. Come back five minutes later. Forget which window has the latest version.

I lost twenty minutes finishing what should have been a five-minute email. If you use more than two AI tools, you know this exact dance.

The Hidden Cost of Living in 12 AI Tools

I have tested most AI assistants released in the past two years. I currently have active accounts on 12 of them.

1. Context loss between models

Every tab switch from Claude to ChatGPT means re-establishing context. Twenty seconds here, thirty seconds there.

2. Prompt graveyard

Where is the prompt you wrote three weeks ago for support replies? You wrote it once, it worked, and now you cannot find it.

3. The best-model-for-the-job problem

Claude is strongest at long-form. ChatGPT has the best image-to-text. Gemini does best multi-language. We are using 60% capacity of tools that could give us 100%.

4. No reusable workflows

There is no Monday morning workflow. There are 14 separate tabs you open, in a vague order, where you paste the same scaffolding prompts you have pasted a hundred times. It is a routine, not a workflow.

5. Subscription stack burnout

ChatGPT Plus $20, Claude Pro $20, Gemini Advanced $20, Cursor $20, Perplexity Pro $20. Quickly you are spending $200/mo and still managing them with your brain.

What is Wrong With Existing Unified Solutions

• Poe: Great model variety, no workflow chaining.

• OpenRouter: API-level — useful for devs, useless for non-coders.

• Msty / LM Studio: Local-first, missing cloud convenience.

• CrewAI, AutoGPT: Powerful but for engineers.

What is missing is a tool that treats AI like the way I actually use it: as a workflow tool — reusable templates with named inputs, model-chained pipelines, a shareable library.

What We Are Building: AI Handler

Three core concepts.

1. Workflows, not chats

Define a workflow once with named inputs and a chain of AI calls. Run it once, run it 100 times — the workflow is the same.

2. Multi-model chaining

Each step can use a different model. The workflow does not care which model runs each step. Swap without rewriting.

3. Shared workflow library

Browse public workflows for common tasks and remix them. Think GitHub for prompts, but actually usable.

Who This Is For

If you have ever maintained a personal prompt library in Notion that you abandoned, spent 10+ minutes context-switching for a single task, or wished you could save a sequence of AI steps to repeat tomorrow — you are our user.

Pricing

$19/month for individuals, team plans later in 2026. We host the model API costs — no BYOK, no per-token. $19, run as many workflows as your work demands.

Launch Date

June 1, 2026 for private beta. First 200 users receive 6 months free, lifetime 30% discount on team plans, direct line to me (the founder) on Slack.

Join the Waitlist

Email [e-mail] with subject "AI Handler beta." Add a note about your top 3 AI workflows you wish you could automate, the more I know about how you actually work the better.

I read every email personally. (I am one person.)

About Eternalsix

AI Handler is the second product from Eternalsix. Our first product Hakwooner is a study-management platform for the Korean academy market, beta July 2026. Third project Eternalsix Tools Lab — daily new micro-tools.

Contact: [e-mail]