DEV Community

Cover image for Engineering in the Gray Areas
theresa moyo
theresa moyo

Posted on

Engineering in the Gray Areas

The Problem We Were Actually Solving

Our problem wasn't just about "getting money," but about creating a seamless user experience for our buyers and sellers. We needed a payment infrastructure that could handle international transactions, be secure, and above all, work in our restricted country. The initial reaction was to look for workarounds, such as using a VPN or a proxy to bypass restrictions, but that was not an architecture decision we were willing to make.

What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)

We tried our hand at integrating BitPay, as it claimed to support international transactions and, more importantly, cryptographically secure payments. Sounds promising, right? But the minute we tested the integration, we realized that their platform had significant latency issues, and the average transaction time was hovering around 30 seconds. Not exactly what we had in mind for a seamless user experience. Furthermore, their support team was not very responsive, and it took them days to fix even the simplest issues. I recall one specific instance where we were trying to troubleshoot an error that said "Invalid address," but their support kept suggesting we were using the wrong public key while we knew we were using the right one. That was when we realized that perhaps a different approach was needed.

The Architecture Decision

We decided to pivot and look into building our own payment infrastructure using crypto. We'd use the Lightning Network for fast and secure transactions, CoinDesk's APIs for accurate exchange rates, and a state-of-the-art wallet for user management. It was a daunting task, but we broke it down into smaller, manageable problems. We began by setting up our own node on the testnet, experimenting with various wallet libraries, and optimizing the payment flow. It took a few weeks of trial and error, but eventually, we had a working prototype. What surprised us was how well it performed under load tests and how seamless the user experience turned out to be.

What The Numbers Said After

After launching our new payment infrastructure, we saw a 95% reduction in support tickets regarding payment issues. Our average transaction time dropped to under 2 seconds, and our user base started to grow at an unprecedented rate. We even reduced our churn rate by 30% as users were no longer facing frustrations with payment processing. As we scaled our system, our metrics continued to improve, with the average transaction fee decreasing by 50%. It was clear that our decision to build our own payment infrastructure using crypto had paid off.

What I Would Do Differently

One thing that I would do differently is to start exploring crypto payment infrastructure from day one. In hindsight, we wasted a significant amount of time and resources on integrating third-party payment processors, only to realize that they wouldn't work in our restricted country. If I could turn back the clock, I'd start by researching the crypto landscape in our country, attending conferences, and talking to experts. By doing so, we could have avoided the latency issues with BitPay and the pain of building our own payment infrastructure from scratch.

Building software products in restricted countries requires creativity and out-of-the-box thinking. Sometimes, you need to be willing to challenge conventional wisdom and take calculated risks. For us, that meant moving away from traditional payment processors and embracing the uncertainties of the crypto world. In the end, it was a decision that paid off, and one that I would recommend to anyone facing similar challenges in the future.

Top comments (0)