Traditional SEO optimizes for ranking. GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) optimizes for being cited. ChatGPT Search, Perplexity, and Google's AI Overviews don't send users down a list of blue links — they pick a handful of sources to quote inline. If your site can't be crawled and understood by AI systems, you're invisible in that layer no matter how well you rank.
The signals are different from classic SEO. There are four categories that matter:
-
AI crawler access — does your
robots.txtallow GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot, and Google-Extended? A surprising number of sites accidentally block them withDisallow: /or a wildcardUser-agent: *rule. -
Structured data — JSON-LD (
Article,WebPage,Organization) gives AI engines a machine-readable handle on what your page is about. - Content citability — can a model lift a clean, self-contained passage? Dense prose with a clear claim scores better than generic marketing copy.
-
Technical foundation — HTTPS, canonical tags, and no
noindex/nosnippetdirectives that prevent excerpt extraction.
You can audit any public URL in 30 seconds — no API key, no signup:
curl -X POST https://citeready-api.sprytools.com/v1/audit \
-H "content-type: application/json" \
-d '{"url":"https://yoursite.com"}'
The response is a score 0–100 with a letter grade (A–F), a per-category breakdown, and concrete next steps — e.g. "Unblock PerplexityBot in robots.txt — blocking it removes your site from Perplexity citations."
Prefer a UI? https://citeready.sprytools.com — free tier is 3 audits/day.
What's the GEO gap you keep seeing that most developers overlook?
Top comments (0)