Welcome to the final part of our blog series on mastering the SOLID principles in Flutter.
If you’ve followed along, we’ve already covered:
Today, we complete the series with:
D - Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)
📘 Definition:
High-level modules should not depend on low-level modules.
Both should depend on abstractions.Also: Abstractions should not depend on details, but details should depend on abstractions.
🔌 Real-Life Analogy:
You charge your phone using a charger interface — not hard-wired to the wall.
Tomorrow if the power source changes (solar, generator, battery), your charger still works.
In code:
- High-level logic (like your app’s business rules) shouldn’t depend on low-level implementation details like storage, network APIs.
- Instead, both rely on interfaces.
💡 Flutter-Specific Example:
❌ Wrong: Tight Coupling
class AuthService {
final FirebaseAuth _firebaseAuth = FirebaseAuth.instance;
Future<void> login(String email, String password) {
return _firebaseAuth.signInWithEmailAndPassword(email: email, password: password);
}
}
Problem:
- The app is tightly coupled to Firebase.
- If you switch to Supabase or REST API, you’ll have to rewrite all AuthService logic.
✅ Right: Inversion via Abstraction
abstract class IAuthProvider {
Future<void> login(String email, String password);
}
// Firebase implementation
class FirebaseAuthProvider implements IAuthProvider {
final FirebaseAuth _auth = FirebaseAuth.instance;
@override
Future<void> login(String email, String password) {
return _auth.signInWithEmailAndPassword(email: email, password: password);
}
}
// Higher-level logic
class AuthService {
final IAuthProvider provider;
AuthService(this.provider);
Future<void> login(String email, String password) {
return provider.login(email, password);
}
}
Now:
- AuthService depends only on IAuthProvider — not on Firebase.
- You can swap with Supabase, REST, or a Mock class for testing.
📦 Real Flutter App Use Case: Dependency Injection
Using packages like get_it, riverpod, or provider:
final authService = AuthService(FirebaseAuthProvider());
- You inject concrete implementations only at runtime or app startup — not hard-coded inside services.
🔑 Key Takeaways:
- High-level classes depend on abstractions, not concrete tools (like Firebase, SQLite, APIs).
- Makes testing easier by mocking implementations.
- Improves flexibility and maintainability.
🧠 Interview One-Liner:
“DIP helps me keep my business logic decoupled from frameworks like Firebase or Dio. I design with interfaces and inject actual implementations using Provider or GetIt in Flutter.”
✅ Summary of All 5 SOLID Principles (Quick Recall)
Principle | Meaning | Flutter Example |
---|---|---|
S | One class = One job | Separate UI, Service, and Navigation |
O | Open to extend, closed to modify | Use interfaces for payment methods |
L | Child class must honor parent behavior | Avoid misusing inheritance (e.g., Ostrich) |
I | Keep interfaces small & focused | Split validators, user roles |
D | Depend on abstractions, not concrete | Inject Firebase via interface |
Popular Libraries Supporting SOLID:
- get_it: Dependency injection
- provider/riverpod: State management with DI
- flutter_bloc: Separation of concerns
- dio + retrofit: Abstract HTTP clients
✅ That’s a Wrap on Part 3 – And the Whole SOLID Series!
🎯 Final Thoughts
By applying the SOLID principles, you’re not just writing cleaner code —
you’re creating an architecture that can scale, adapt, and survive real-world complexity.
Whether you’re prepping for an interview or improving a legacy app, these principles will guide you toward better software design.
🙌 Thank You for Following the Series!
If this series helped you:
✅ Drop a like
💬 Share your thoughts in the comments
📢 Share with other devs
And let’s continue building SOLID Flutter apps together 🚀
🚀 A complete Flutter project applying all 5 SOLID principles is coming soon — stay tuned for the GitHub repo drop!
Top comments (0)