DEV Community

Iliya Garakh
Iliya Garakh

Posted on • Originally published at devops-radar.com on

Decoding Network Security Monitoring: A Pragmatic Comparison of Zeek, pfSense, and Security Onion for DevOps

#network #networksecuritymonit #security #incidentresponse

Why Does Network Security Monitoring Still Feel Like Guessing in 2025?

Decoding Network Security Monitoring: A Pragmatic Comparison of Zeek, pfSense, and Security Onion for DevOps

Despite all the big promises and shiny dashboards, most organisations I’ve worked with have networks behaving like a slice of Swiss cheese—except the holes are not only widening, they’re spawning new ones overnight. Ever wondered why decades of tooling haven't stopped attackers from slipping through? The brutal truth is that adding more monitoring often makes outages worse. Surprised? You shouldn’t be. When alerts flood in like spam emails, and every false positive is a heart-stopping “wait, what?!”, your ops team isn’t winning — they’re drowning.

I’ve spent over a decade wrestling with these invisible blind spots and endless tool sprawl. If you’re nodding along, you’re not alone. This article slices through the fancy marketing fog around three titans of network security monitoring — Zeek , pfSense , and Security Onion — so you can stop spinning your wheels and start making informed, confident decisions.

Platform Overviews: The Stories Behind the Tools

Zeek: The Network Archaeologist With a Bottomless Toolkit

Imagine a quiet owl perched endlessly monitoring every packet that passes your network—fearlessly flirtatious scripts included. That’s Zeek (formerly Bro)1. Zeek sniffs traffic passively, giving you forensic-level detail about every handshake, session, and DNS whisper. But beware: wielding Zeek’s powerful event-driven scripting without losing your sanity requires patience, devotion, and a penchant for fine-tuning that borders on obsession.

pfSense: Your Friendly Neighbourhood Swiss Army Knife

pfSense is what you get when you want a firewall, router, VPN, and a mildly nosy security guard all wrapped in a friendly web interface2. Its charm lies in accessibility—ideal for small to medium businesses who want decent perimeter control without the cerebral gymnastics of forensic analysis. But don’t expect a Sherlock Holmes here; pfSense’s IDS tools are the equivalent of a bouncer occasionally checking IDs—not interrogating suspicious behaviour patterns.

Security Onion: The Enterprise Kitchen Sink You Didn’t Know You Needed

If you have an appetite for the entire orchestra—firewalls, IDS, endpoint detection, log aggregation—Security Onion slams it into one distribution3. Snort, Suricata, Zeek, Wazuh, and the ELK Stack all play a symphony of cross-correlated alerts. It’s a heavyweight contender with resource demands to match; think of it like hiring the entire special forces team, then asking them to coordinate without a skirmish plan.

Decoding Network Security Monitoring: A Pragmatic Comparison of Zeek, pfSense, and Security Onion for DevOps

Digging Deeper: What Happens Under the Hood?

Zeek

Architecture & Deployment

Zeek listens silently at your network taps, parsing every packet into rich, contextual logs—DNS queries, HTTP sessions, TLS handshakes1. Deploy it where you want high-fidelity visibility: network taps or inline sensors. Scaling Zeek at gigabit speeds isn’t trivial — multiple sensors, packet brokers, and vigilant monitoring of packet drop counters via zeekctl netstats are essential. Missing packets cripple detection accuracy and risk missing critical events like ransomware command-and-control beacons.

Customisation

Its event-driven scripting lets you craft bespoke detection rules that really understand your environment—but maintaining that codebase can quickly morph into an all-consuming moonlight job. I recall one incident where a seemingly simple script to detect malicious C&C beacons ballooned to a 200-line beast after repeated tweaks; the ops manager’s dark humour: “It’s like houseplants, it needs daily watering.”

Monitoring Features

Zeek excels at detailing subtle network shifts—like a shadow at the edges of your visibility—but it won’t block anything. It’s the quiet sentinel, not the gatekeeper.

pfSense

Architecture & Use Cases

pfSense is the proverbial “jack-of-all-trades” firewall/router combo with an accessible web UI2. It fits smallest to medium networks or as a perimeter device in larger setups. Modularity lets you add Snort or Suricata IDS packages, but these IDS tools retain signature-based detection limitations.

Monitoring Capabilities

Real-time connection stats and basic alerts come standard; digging deeper requires external tools or more complex setups. I once helped a regional retailer deploy pfSense with Snort, and it caught a perimeter exploit that had slipped past their legacy firewall. However, no internal network monitoring left a “wait, what?” moment later when lateral movements went unnoticed.

Security Onion

Architecture & Integration

The pièce de résistance: Security Onion bundles signature-based IDS engines Suricata and Snort, Zeek’s deep packet analysis, Wazuh for endpoint detection, plus the ELK Stack for visualisation and alert orchestration3. If you want a ready-to-roll solution from day one, it’s the all-in-one boat—though you’ll need to feed it generously with CPU, RAM, and speedy storage. Recent versions like 2.4.180 bring improved usability and component updates, but resource requirements remain substantial.

Customisation and Monitoring

Pre-built dashboards, automatic rule tuning scripts, and threat hunting workflows mean less setup time but more operational heft. Too many times, I’ve seen this resource hog choke on insufficient hardware, causing packet drops that mimic ghost alerts: “Why did this critical event vanish into thin air?”

Curious about tailoring IDS engines within Security Onion? Check out the High-Performance Network IDS Showdown: Suricata vs Snort – What DevOps Must Know for Reliable Threat Detection for a deep dive.

The Crucial Scorecard: How They Stack Up

Criteria Zeek pfSense Security Onion
Scalability Horizontal scaling; complex tuning Best for SMB/perimeter Scalable but resource intensive
Resource Use Moderate CPU & network IO Low to moderate High CPU, RAM, and disk I/O
Management Ease Steep learning curve; scripting Friendly UI; easy setup Medium-to-hard; heavy but integrated
Community Support Strong OSS community Large user base, plentiful tutorials Active community; enterprise-grade
Integration SIEM integration via logs Integrates Snort/Suricata IDS Native ELK and Wazuh integration
Suitability Deep forensics, high throughput Perimeter defence, smaller teams Enterprise-grade integrated monitoring

Hands-On Deployment and Common Trips to the Ops Graveyard

Zeek Deployment: 

# On Ubuntu 22.04 - install Zeek
sudo apt update && sudo apt install zeek

# Interface configuration and deployment
sudo zeekctl deploy

# Sample script to detect suspicious DNS queries
@load policy/protocols/dns
event dns_request(c: connection, query: string) {
  if ( /.*\.mybanklogin\.com$/ in query )
    print fmt("Suspicious DNS query detected: %s", query);
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Error Handling: Always monitor packet drops with zeekctl netstats; missed packets cripple detection accuracy and can lead to missed critical incidents like ransomware C2. Consider scripts or alerts to notify on packet loss thresholds. Remember, Zeek is passive—no automatic blocking—so feed timely detection downstream to your security response workflow1.

pfSense Setup:

  • Deploy pfSense on bare metal or VM.
  • Configure WAN/LAN and firewall rules via web UI.
  • Install Snort from the Package Manager.
  • Enable Snort IDS on WAN interface for edge detection.

Common Pitfall: Beware the "open firewall" syndrome—excessively lax rules are invitation letters to attackers. In one engagement, sloppy default rules allowed lateral movement that Snort never saw. Regularly audit your firewall rules and keep IDS signatures up to date2.

Security Onion Quickstart:

  • Download ISO or leverage PXE install.
  • Use setup wizard for network config.
  • Access Kibana dashboards by browsing to your management IP.
  • Adjust alert thresholds to fine-tune noise levels.

Watch Out: If CPU or disk IO max out, expect missed packets and phantom alerts. Real-world deployments require continuous monitoring of hardware health and alert integrity. Automate hardware monitoring if possible to avoid operational surprises3.

If you want to round out your deployment with best practices on automating configuration and vulnerability management, the Automated Security Configuration Management: Battle-Tested Comparison of Ansible Hardening, ClamAV, and BLUESPAWN for Real-World DevOps is essential reading.

Field Tested Insights: Benchmarks and Realities

My teams have distilled stark realities from production chaos:

  • Zeek reduced false negatives by 30% in a mid-tier bank after six torturous months of tuning scripts and scaling sensors — not for the faint-hearted or poorly staffed4.
  • pfSense with Snort saved a regional retailer from several perimeter attacks; nonetheless, undetected lateral breaches reminded everyone why layered security matters.
  • Security Onion cut mean time to detection by half for a global enterprise, but the hardware footprint and required expertise made it a long-haul commitment.

Two cliffhangers here: Can your team handle the operational complexity? And what’s your appetite for hardware investment?

The 'Aha' Moment: Monitoring Isn’t a Product, It’s a Philosophy

Taking your network security monitoring to the next level means marrying passive insight (Zeek), active defence (pfSense firewall), and holistic correlation (Security Onion). Alone, each is a rough diamond; together, they form a multi-layered shield that closes nasty blind spots.

If you’re still shouting into the network monitoring void, it might not be your tools—it’s the how and why you use them that matters.

The Road Ahead: Emerging Trends to Watch

  • AI-Enhanced Anomaly Detection: Machine learning models increasingly reduce false alarms by understanding baseline network behaviour, catching zero-days before you can say “wait, what?”5
  • Cloud-Native Observability: Containerised sensors with auto-scaling—integrated with CNCF projects like OpenTelemetry—make monitoring elastic and cost-effective.
  • Self-Tuning Sensors & Auto-Remediation: Next-gen tools will adjust detection thresholds dynamically and kick off automated mitigation, slashing human toil and errors.

Conclusion: Your Crystal-Clear Next Steps and Success Metrics

Face these truths before picking your network sentinel:

  • Zeek: Ideal if your team is skilled, patient, and craving forensic depth.
  • pfSense: The pragmatic firewall with decent IDS for smaller teams or perimeter-first defence.
  • Security Onion: Enterprise-ready, pre-integrated monitoring for heavy-duty ops teams with resources to match.

Start smart: pilot each in a controlled environment, measure detection rates against alert volumes, tally operational costs, then decide whether to scale or pivot.

Ultimate measure? Faster mean time to detection (MTTD) and lower risk profiles—not dashboard razzle-dazzle or hollow buzzwords.

Network security monitoring remains part art, part science, and all worthy of your grit. Choose wisely, wield sharply, adapt relentlessly — because the enemy surely won’t.

References

  1. Zeek Official Documentation — https://docs.zeek.org/en/current/ ↩ ↩ ↩
  2. pfSense User Guide — https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/ ↩ ↩ ↩
  3. Security Onion Project Docs — https://securityonion.net/docs/ ↩ ↩ ↩
  4. Open Source IDS Tools: Comparing Suricata, Snort, Bro (Zeek) (2025) — https://levelblue.com/blogs/security-essentials/open-source-intrusion-detection-tools-a-quick-overview ↩
  5. AI-Enhanced Anomaly Detection in Network Security (2025) — https://arxiv.org/html/2509.15555v1 ↩

If you ever want to swap war stories over a pint, I’m just a ping away — because lessons learned in the trenches are the only ones worth sharing.

Top comments (0)