DevX for Robust UI Logic: React + TypeScript with the Power of the never Type

Exhaustive Type Checking with never in TypeScript (Without Crashing Your App)

When building real-world applications with React and TypeScript, we often work with union types like "loading" | "success" | "error" or "admin" | "editor" | "viewer".

TypeScript ensures compile-time safety, but what happens when your backend sends unexpected values, or when a new case slips in unnoticed?

This is where the never type comes in.

It enforces exhaustive type checking at compile time. But in production, you don’t always want to throw errors and crash your app-users deserve a graceful fallback instead.

Let’s explore how to use never effectively while keeping apps both safe and resilient.

---

📌 1. never Type for Exhaustive Type Checking in TypeScript

• Purpose of never: Represents values that should never occur.
• How it works: Assigning a value to never that isn’t truly unreachable causes a compile-time error.
• Common usage: Typically used in switch or if-else blocks to guarantee that all union type members (e.g., "loading" | "success" | "error") are handled.

---

📌 2. Behavior When API Returns a Value Not in the Union Type

• Scenario: You define a union type like "admin" | "editor" | "viewer", but your API mistakenly returns "super-admin".
• Type mismatch: Directly assigning this string to the union type will fail type checking.
• Unsafe workaround: Using type assertion (as UserRole) bypasses type safety but can lead to runtime bugs.
• Best practice: Use a type guard function to validate API responses before assigning them to the union type.

---

📌 3. Compile-Time vs Runtime Implications of Invalid Values

• Compile-time safety:

  • TypeScript catches invalid assignments immediately.
  • never in exhaustive checks forces developers to handle every possible union member.

• Runtime behavior:

  • Invalid data can still sneak in at runtime (e.g., unexpected API response).
  • Throwing an error in a default branch will crash the app.
  • Returning a fallback UI allows the app to continue gracefully.

---

📌 4. Graceful Fallback Using never Without Crashing

• Pattern: Use never for compile-time safety, but instead of throwing errors, provide fallback UI in production.
• Benefit: Protects users from app crashes while maintaining strict type safety during development.
• Optional enhancement: Log unexpected values for debugging or send them to monitoring tools.

---

📌 5. Whether Throwing an Error Is Mandatory in Exhaustive Checks

• Not required: Throwing an error is common, but not mandatory.

• Alternatives:

  • Return fallback UI
  • Log a warning
  • Show a toast or alert
  • Redirect to a safe page

• Key takeaway: What matters is not the error itself, but the never assignment that enforces compile-time completeness.

---

📌 6. Throwing Error vs Fallback Using never Type

• Throwing an error:

  • Best for development/debug builds.
  • Forces developers to handle new union members.

• Returning fallback UI:

  • Best for production.
  • Prevents app crashes and allows graceful degradation.

• Best practice:

  • Dev mode: Throw errors to surface bugs early.
  • Prod mode: Use fallback UI with logging/monitoring to keep the app stable.

---

✅ Key Takeaway

The never type is more than just a TypeScript curiosity-it’s a practical safeguard.

Use it to enforce exhaustive checks at compile time, but combine it with graceful fallbacks in production to ensure your app never crashes in front of users.

This balance-strictness during development and resilience in production-is what makes never one of the most valuable tools in the TypeScript toolbox.

---

💡 If you’ve run into scenarios where unexpected values slipped through your API or state machine, how did you handle it?

Would you lean towards failing fast or graceful fallbacks?

Share your thoughts in the comments-I’d love to hear how other devs approach this!