Trying to figure out why skilled freshers still struggle to get opportunities.
Over the past year, I’ve been learning full-stack development, building projects, writing blogs, and talking to friends in tech.
And the more I look at the fresher job market, the more confusing it feels.
It’s not just my experience, the same patterns show up in job posts, community discussions, and the stories my friends share.
Freshers today are learning faster, adapting faster, and using modern tools earlier… but somehow still struggling more.
I’m not trying to make a big argument here.
I’m just trying to understand why.
1. Experience Inflation: The New “Entry Level” Requires 3–7 Years
It’s strange seeing “Junior Developer” roles asking for three, five, even seven years of experience.
At first, I thought maybe I was misunderstanding something.
But the more I asked around, the more it made sense, not from a skills perspective, but a structural one.
From what I keep hearing or reading online:
- Teams are understaffed
- Seniors don’t have bandwidth to mentor
- Delivery pressure is high
- Managers want “ready-made” devs
- Old job descriptions get recycled
- Risk-avoidance beats experimentation
It’s not that freshers can’t learn quickly, they absolutely can.
It’s that many teams don’t have the space to onboard someone who’s still figuring things out.
So “entry-level” quietly shifted into “minimal-mentorship-required.”
And suddenly, everyone is underqualified.
2. Outdated Training: When Courses Lag Behind Developers
Another pattern I’ve noticed through friends:
A lot of companies use vendor-provided training packages, especially for things like ChatGPT, AI usage, and internal tooling.
These packages get bought once, then rolled out for years.
The result?
People in companies are being asked to complete “mandatory AI training” made in 2023, while most students today already use:
- better prompting techniques
- GPT-4/5 level tools
- code generation workflows
- debugging using AI
- integrated tools like Cursor, Copilot, Windsurf, etc.
So you get this strange paradox:
The students are often ahead of the corporate training systems meant to “prepare them.”
This is not a criticism, just an observation.
Internal L&D cycles move slowly.
External technology moves fast.
And freshers grow up on the fast-moving side of the curve.
3. AI Literacy Mismatch: Companies Want AI, But Aren’t Ready for AI-Literate Freshers
A smaller portion of this post is about AI, but it fits into the bigger pattern.
Something friends often mention:
- companies say “AI adaptation is important”
- but restrict AI tools due to compliance
- or require outdated “intro to AI” certificates
- or avoid AI-generated code in real work
- or don’t know how to evaluate AI skills
Meanwhile students and newer devs:
- use AI in projects daily
- understand workflow speed-ups
- debug with LLMs
- build faster because of tools
There’s a mismatch in readiness.
Not from the fresher side
but from the system around them.
Companies want AI benefits, without the internal structure to support AI-integrated workflows.
So “AI training” becomes a checkbox, and hiring doesn’t change.
4. A System That Feels Slightly Out of Sync With Today’s Developers
Putting all this together, the experience inflation, the slow training cycles, the AI mismatch, it creates a pattern:
Developers today adapt fast.
Systems around them adapt slow.
This leads to moments that feel strange:
- freshers who actually understand modern tools
- job descriptions that don’t match real expectations
- companies teaching outdated material
- AI being hyped publicly but limited internally
- “talent shortage” headlines next to empty fresher pipelines
It’s not that anyone is doing something wrong.
It’s that the structure itself moves slowly by design.
And because of that, freshers end up stuck between capability and opportunity.
5. What This Means for Someone Like Me
I don’t have corporate experience yet, everything I’m writing comes from:
- friends working in different companies
- blogs and discussions
- job posts
- My dad's advice (he’s been in tech since I was a kid, so he has a calm understanding of how slowly industry structures tend to change)
- my own attempts to break in
And honestly, this whole situation leaves me with more questions than answers.
I’m staying consistent:
- writing weekly blogs
- studying Japanese
- practicing full-stack (mostly frontend)
- exploring Web3 architecture because I think it might shape my future projects
But I’m still trying to understand what direction someone like me should take next in a market like this.
One might even say I’m quietly hoping to bump into a good mentor on here, lol.
6. So… When Does This Get Better?
I don’t think the current gap will last forever.
Eventually:
- AI skills will become standard
- onboarding systems will improve
- training will update
- fresher roles will become fresher again
- managers will get better at evaluating modern workflows
- and internal processes will catch up to the way developers actually work today
But right now, it’s happening slowly.
So I’m left with a genuine question: one I ask with curiosity, not frustration:
What should someone like me focus on next?
If you’ve navigated this phase before, or if you mentor juniors,
I’d appreciate any perspective you have.
Until then, I’ll keep learning and building, and hopefully, understanding a little more each week.
Top comments (0)