Pavel Ivanov

Posted on Jan 30

Exploring AI Infrastructure: Vibe Coding's Promise and Risks

#security #devops #cloud #ai

Vibe coding - building software by prompting AI tools instead of writing every line by hand - is changing how products ship. For AI‑first founders and indie devs, it feels like a superpower: idea in the morning, working prototype by the afternoon. But when that prototype touches real users and real data, your AI infrastructure suddenly matters more than your prompt engineering.

If your backend is shaky, AI‑generated code can become an expensive liability instead of a shortcut. In this article we’ll unpack how vibe coding fits into modern software development, what can go wrong from a code security perspective, and how to design cloud development workflows and backends that let you move fast without hiring a full DevOps team.

Understanding vibe coding

Vibe coding is the practice of describing what you want in natural language and letting AI tools generate the implementation: API endpoints, database models, deployment scripts, even CI/CD configs.

Instead of:

opening your editor
scaffolding a new service
wiring up models, controllers, routes, tests

…you write a prompt like:

“Create a secure REST API for a mobile app with user auth, password reset, and rate limiting. Use Node.js and MongoDB.”

The LLM spits out runnable code, and you iterate through more prompts.

For AI‑first solo devs and non‑technical founders, vibe coding:

Lowers the barrier to entry - you can build working apps with limited traditional coding background.
Automates boilerplate - authentication flows, CRUD APIs, deployment YAMLs, SDK wrappers.
Accelerates experimentation - you can test more product ideas before committing a full team.

The catch: the AI doesn’t own the consequences of bad decisions. You do.

Where vibe coding fits in modern AI infrastructure

When people talk about AI infrastructure, they often think about GPUs and model hosting. For vibe coding, the more important layer is everything around the model:

Your backend platform (e.g., Parse Server, mobile backend as a service, custom microservices).
Your data stores (managed databases, file storage, vector search).
Your identity and access control (auth, roles, API keys, secrets management).
Your observability and deployment pipeline (logs, metrics, staging, rollbacks).

Vibe coding doesn’t remove this stack - it just changes who is writing the glue code and infrastructure definitions. Instead of a senior backend engineer, it’s a large language model trained on public code.

That’s powerful, but it means your infrastructure has to be opinionated and safe by default. The less freedom AI‑generated code has to misconfigure networks, leak credentials, or over‑privilege services, the better.

For small teams that don’t want a full DevOps function, this is where a strong managed backend or mobile backend as a service (MBaaS) becomes strategic: you constrain the surface area AI can accidentally break.

The promise and perils of AI tools in software development

From a pure software development velocity standpoint, vibe coding is incredible:

LLMs can assemble patterns they’ve seen thousands of times in open source.
They’re tireless at boilerplate and refactoring.
They help non‑experts cross the gap from idea to working code.

But this convenience hides several structural risks.

1. Generic code in specific environments

AI tools don’t really know your:

regulatory context (GDPR, HIPAA, financial regulations)
data residency requirements
corporate security baselines
production architecture quirks

So they generate generic solutions. That’s fine for a toy app; it’s dangerous when you’re handling production customer data in the EU, or connecting to payment providers and identity platforms.

2. Security blind spots

LLMs don’t reliably reason about code security. Research on AI‑generated code (for example, the GitHub Copilot security study by NYU and Columbia researchers) has shown that a significant portion of generated snippets contain vulnerabilities such as hard‑coded credentials, missing input validation, or insecure crypto.

You can’t assume that “it compiles” means “it’s safe.”

Some common security issues in AI‑generated code include:

SQL / NoSQL injection
Insecure direct object references
Broken authentication flows
Hard‑coded secrets and tokens
Overly broad IAM roles or ACLs

The OWASP Top 10 is still the baseline, even if an AI wrote your code.

3. Supply chain and dependency risks

LLMs tend to:

pull in whatever package they’ve seen in training data
reference outdated or unmaintained libraries
skip pinned versions and integrity checks

That exposes your stack to software supply chain attacks, where attackers compromise upstream packages or repos to reach many downstream apps at once. The SolarWinds and Log4j incidents are classic (non‑AI) examples of how painful this can be.

Resources like the NIST Secure Software Development Framework and OWASP Software Component Verification Standard provide guidance on how to treat dependencies as first‑class security assets.

Vibe coding doesn’t change those principles - it just automates dependency choices you might not even notice were made.

Security implications when AI writes your backend

When AI‑generated code is responsible for your backend - APIs, auth, database access, background jobs - the stakes increase:

Every bug is remote‑exploitable by default. Your backend is internet‑facing.
Data exposure is amplified. A single misconfigured query or ACL can leak entire tables.
Incidents propagate. A vulnerable pattern can be copy‑pasted across many services by the same prompts.

For teams using a managed backend or MBaaS, this is both a risk and an opportunity.

What goes wrong most often

Common anti‑patterns we see when teams lean heavily on vibe coding:

Over‑privileged master keys embedded in mobile apps or frontend code.
Bypassing access control by running everything as “admin” in cloud functions.
Direct database access from AI‑generated microservices with no row‑level or class‑level permissions.
Lack of environment separation, with staging and production sharing credentials.

All of these are solvable with the right architecture and platform defaults.

How a managed backend can reduce the blast radius

A well‑designed MBaaS or backend platform gives you:

Built‑in authentication and authorization primitives.
Class‑level and row‑level permissions that are enforced server‑side.
Cloud functions / serverless code that run in a sandbox with controlled privileges.
Background jobs and queues that isolate long‑running work.

This lets AI‑generated code live in a more constrained environment. Instead of letting a prompt create a completely new microservice with its own network policies, you:

expose a narrow set of backend APIs
allow custom logic only in controlled cloud code
rely on platform‑enforced security boundaries

You’re not trusting the AI with everything - just with the parts that are easier to review and roll back.

For structured guidance, frameworks like OWASP Application Security Verification Standard are worth mapping to your backend capabilities and CI checks.

Balancing convenience with risk in cloud development

Vibe coding is essentially cloud development on fast‑forward. To keep the benefits without the nightmares, treat AI as a very fast junior developer:

Never give AI direct production access.
- All changes go through version control.
- No model‑generated code is deployed without human review.
Standardize your backend scaffolding.
- Define templates for services, cloud functions, database schemas.
- Ask AI to fill in templates, not invent architectures from scratch.
Automate the boring security checks.
- Static analysis and SAST tools in CI.
- Dependency scanning and SBOM generation.
- Secret scanning for hard‑coded tokens.
Use staging as a non‑negotiable gate.
- Every AI‑generated change deploys to staging first.
- Run smoke tests, security tests, and basic performance checks.
Log everything.
- Centralized logs for API calls, auth events, and background jobs.
- Alerts for anomalies like sudden spikes in 500s or auth failures.

Modern cloud providers and backend platforms make these patterns practical even for small teams. The more your platform gives you out‑of‑the‑box, the less bespoke DevOps you need to maintain.

For additional patterns specific to AI workloads, Google’s reference on architectures for generative AI applications is a good starting point.

A practical checklist for safe vibe coding

If you’re building your first AI‑heavy product, here’s a minimal checklist you can run through before trusting vibe‑coded backends with real users.

People and process

[ ] Treat AI as an assistant, not an engineer.
[ ] Require human review and approval for all backend changes.
[ ] Maintain a coding standard and security baseline your prompts must follow.

Code and dependencies

[ ] Run static analysis (SAST) on all AI‑generated code.
[ ] Use dependency scanning and keep packages updated.
[ ] Pin versions and avoid unmaintained libraries.
[ ] Check AI‑generated crypto, auth, and access logic twice.

Infrastructure and permissions

[ ] Separate staging and production environments.
[ ] Use least‑privilege IAM roles for services and cloud functions.
[ ] Enforce server‑side ACLs on data (class‑level / row‑level permissions).
[ ] Avoid exposing direct database access from untrusted code.

Data and privacy

[ ] Don’t paste secrets, tokens, or sensitive customer data into public LLMs.
[ ] Prefer region‑bound storage that matches your regulatory needs (e.g., 100% EU for GDPR).
[ ] Log access to sensitive data and review regularly.

For an overview of emerging AI‑specific attack patterns (prompt injection, data exfiltration via tools, etc.), the Microsoft AI security guidance and MITRE ATLAS are helpful references.

Choosing an AI‑ready backend when you don’t have DevOps

Most AI‑first startups and indie founders don’t want to build and run their own backend infrastructure. They’d rather spend time on product, prompts, and users.

That’s where an AI‑ready, managed backend - often based on Parse Server or similar stacks - can give you leverage without a DevOps team.

When evaluating platforms, look for:

Data sovereignty and compliance by design
- EU‑only or region‑locked infrastructure options.
- Clear data processing and residency guarantees.
- Alignment with GDPR and industry‑specific requirements.
No vendor lock‑in
- Open‑source core (e.g., Parse Server) so you can migrate if you outgrow the platform.
- Direct database access (e.g., MongoDB connection string) for advanced use cases.
AI‑ready primitives
- Built‑in support for real‑time subscriptions (LiveQueries) for chat, collaboration, and in‑product AI.
- Cloud code functions that plug cleanly into LLMs, agents, and tools.
- Background jobs for scheduled and repeatable tasks (model retraining, data syncs).
Developer‑friendly workflow
- Git‑based deployment of cloud code.
- Web dashboard with database browser and fine‑grained permissions.
- Web hosting and SSL managed for you.
Auto‑scaling without complexity
- Auto‑scalable by design, sensible defaults, and no request limits that unexpectedly throttle your AI workloads.
- Global infrastructure options if you have users beyond one region.

For founders who rely heavily on AI coding assistants, a platform that combines Parse‑style MBaaS, real‑time features, and opinionated security defaults can make the difference between a fragile prototype and a production‑ready product.

If you want an EU‑native, Parse‑based backend that’s AI‑ready out of the box - with real‑time queries, cloud code, background jobs, and auto‑scaling so you can ship fast without hiring DevOps - it’s worth taking a few minutes to explore SashiDo’s platform.

The future of vibe coding and AI infrastructure

Vibe coding isn’t going away. LLMs will keep getting better at building APIs, wiring up backends, and generating infrastructure configs. But that doesn’t remove the need for AI infrastructure that’s:

secure by default
region‑aware (e.g., 100% EU for GDPR‑sensitive products)
scalable without bespoke DevOps
friendly to both human and AI contributors

If you’re an AI‑first founder, solo dev, or non‑technical builder, the goal isn’t to become a security engineer overnight. It’s to:

choose platforms that make the safe path the easy path
put lightweight guardrails around AI‑generated code
treat your backend as a product asset, not an afterthought

Do that, and vibe coding becomes what it should be: a powerful accelerator for product ideas, not a hidden source of production incidents and compliance risk.

DEV Community