So, my CS Students keep asking me - what are the differences between Procedural and Object-oriented programming languages?
Makes sense that the info is all in one place now. OOP definitely built on the mistakes/faults of functional programming, and the inclusion of methods, encapsulation, and inheritance make OOP infinitely better.
Feature | Procedural (Functional) Programming | Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) |
---|---|---|
Focus | Procedures or routines (functions) | Objects (instances of classes) |
Data and Functions | Separate entities | Bundled together in classes |
Global Data | Yes, often used | Encourages encapsulation and local data |
Modularity | Emphasizes breaking down into procedures | Emphasizes breaking down into objects and classes |
Classes and Objects | Not applicable | Central to the paradigm, defining blueprints |
Encapsulation | Limited | Key principle, bundling data and methods |
Inheritance | Not typically supported | Supports the creation of derived classes |
Polymorphism | Not typically supported | Supports polymorphism, method overloading, etc. |
Example Languages | C, Pascal, Fortran | Java, C++, Python, Ruby, etc. |
Abstraction | Less emphasis | Emphasizes abstraction for real-world modeling |
Code Reusability | Achieved through functions | Achieved through inheritance, polymorphism, etc. |
Complexity | May be suitable for simpler projects | Often preferred for larger, complex projects |
Real-world Modeling | May not closely mirror entities | Designed to closely mirror real-world entities |
Language Examples | C, Pascal, Fortran | Java, C++, Python, Ruby, etc. |
Top comments (3)
Consider providing some more examples of Functional Programming.
Also example about the pros and cons for the same.
Here are a few more functional programming languages.
Great post.
Please do explain about the Hybrid programming languages, for example - Rust, Python
Very nice. Though in my mind, procedural (aka imperative) is different from functional, which itself is different from object-oriented.