DEV Community

Cover image for Google Veo 3 vs SeeDance vs Hailoum: An Unfiltered Comparison for AI Video Creators
Juddiy
Juddiy

Posted on

Google Veo 3 vs SeeDance vs Hailoum: An Unfiltered Comparison for AI Video Creators

When it comes to AI video generation, most tools give you a single model behind the scenes—usually the “best” one available at the time.

But after working on generative video tools and building Textideo.com—a no-login, credit-based platform for trying multiple video models—I realized something important:

There is no one-size-fits-all model.

Each AI video model has its own quirks, strengths, and breaking points—and the only way to find the best fit is by testing them side by side.

So that’s exactly what I did.

In this post, I’ll share what I’ve learned from comparing Google Veo 3, SeeDance, and Hailoum—with side-by-side results, technical notes, and model recommendations for different creative use cases.

All three models are freely testable on Textideo.com, no login required.


🔬 TL;DR: Quick Model Breakdown

Feature Google Veo 3 SeeDance Hailoum
Strength Cinematic quality, 3D spatial feel Human motion & gesture fidelity Speed + colorful outputs
Prompt Accuracy Medium to high, can override nuance High (especially for choreographed ideas) Low to medium
Best Use Case Ads, trailers, short films Dance clips, music visuals Loops, memes, short TikTok-style vids
Render Time ~90s–2min ~45–60s ~25–40s
Consistency Strong structure, but limited access Great for movement-specific prompts Varies heavily across runs

🧠 In-Depth: What Each Model Actually Does Well (and Doesn’t)

1. 🟢 Google Veo 3

Strengths:

  • Incredible camera motion and shot composition
  • Has a sense of cinematic time—like it’s “thinking in scenes”
  • Beautiful lighting and transitions

Weaknesses:

  • Can ignore nuanced prompt elements
  • Slower to render (~2 mins)
  • Not always publicly accessible (relies on limited endpoints)

Ideal for:

Brand content, concept trailers, storytelling experiments

2. 🟠 SeeDance

Strengths:

  • Best-in-class for choreographed motion, especially human dancing
  • Captures rhythm, beat, body control—feels alive
  • High prompt fidelity in “dance / body” domains

Weaknesses:

  • Outside of dance motions, outputs can feel rigid
  • Less flexible for cinematic or landscape-oriented prompts

Ideal for:

Music videos, stylized loops, motion-visual art projects

3. 🔵 Hailoum

Strengths:

  • Fast generation
  • Bold color palettes, high contrast visuals
  • Great for quick iterations, meme-style creative

Weaknesses:

  • Low prompt fidelity—needs careful prompt tuning
  • Sometimes generates chaotic or unintended content
  • Less temporal consistency

Ideal for:

Fast prototyping, shortform content, visual memes

🧪 Prompt Examples (Same Input, 3 Outputs)

Prompt: “A golden retriever surfing at sunset, cinematic angle, ocean waves crashing”

  • Veo 3: Captured camera dolly-in, warm sunset tones, smooth wave motion
  • SeeDance: Focused on surfboard & dog pose, less atmospheric details
  • Hailoum: Vibrant, surreal, sometimes glitchy surf scene

Prompt: “Cyberpunk woman dancing under neon rain, wide shot”

  • Veo 3: Gorgeous cityscape, moody but subtle gestures
  • SeeDance: Excellent body motion, fluid timing, synced to “invisible beat”
  • Hailoum: Bold neon chaos, lots of movement, little coherence

💡 Why I Built Textideo.com to Support All 3 Models

Most platforms gate access with accounts, tokens, or paid tiers—even just to test a model.

With Textideo.com, I wanted to create a credit-based, no-subscription alternative where users can:

  • Explore multiple models without vendor lock-in
  • Experiment without pressure
  • Choose the right model for their own goals—not someone else’s defaults

There’s no login required, and you only pay for what you use. That’s it.

I built it not just for myself, but for other indie devs, motion designers, AI creators, and educators—anyone who wants to learn through hands-on exploration.


❓The Big Question for Devs and Builders

Should we always chase the “best” model—or prioritize creative diversity by keeping multiple ones accessible?

Model monoculture is convenient.

But creative AI is still young—and diversity might be our biggest strength right now.

What do you think?


🧵 Your Turn: Which Model Stood Out for You?

  • Have you tried any of these models?
  • Did any one surprise you in how it interprets prompts?
  • Would you prefer to build on just one, or offer multiple options?

You can try all three models at Textideo.com—no login needed, no strings attached.

Would love to hear your feedback and ideas for improving the experience!


Top comments (0)