DEV Community

Cover image for Are the numbers we generate truly random?
Joey Lim
Joey Lim

Posted on

Are the numbers we generate truly random?

Introduction

Whenever we need our code to produce a random number, we usually call a method from a library to generate it for us. But are the numbers generated from the library really "random"? In this article, we take a look at Python's random module.

What Does It Mean To Be Truly Random?

To start, we should define what it means to be truly random. To generate a truly random number, the generator needs to choose a number that is unpredictable in which there is no pattern or sequence of events that we can follow to derive the same "random" number. In other words, we would need the generator to be indeterministic.

Pseudo-Random Numbers

The random numbers generated by our software are pseudo-random. We cannot generate a truly random number with the current software we have because they are deterministic. To generate pseudo-random numbers, we usually use a seed as an input to an algorithm. If we use the same seed, we will always get the same number from the algorithm. If a seed is not specified, the software will get a random number based on the machine state. In Python's case, the current system time is used as the seed.

Python's Random Library

Next, let's look at the documentation for Python's built-in Random library.

Right off the bat, Python tells us that the numbers are pseudo-random in its title.

random — Generate pseudo-random numbers

To highlight, we can see that they used the Mersenne Twister algorithm to get a random number.

Python uses the Mersenne Twister as the core generator. It produces 53-bit precision floats and has a period of 2**19937-1.

As a little exercise, let's generate a random number in Python using the random module. We will use a seed of 478.
You will realise that clicking on the 'Run' button will always give you the same result because the same seed will always return you the same number in a pseudo-random number generator. (Note: you can open the embedded code below by clicking on "Open on Replit")

Is Pseudo-Randomness Good Enough?

In most cases, pseudo-random algorithms are good enough, especially if we just need a random number to pick a colour for our app, or randomly shuffle a playlist.

However, there are some cases where it is not ideal to have random numbers that are predictable. For example, we would not want to use a predictable random number in cryptography. In this case, we would have to look at Cryptographically Secure Pseudorandom Number Generators.

Another example would be if we were playing an online game of Poker. If the game generated predictable random numbers, we could potentially write a program to predict the cards that will be dealt if we can figure out the algorithm and seed used.

How Can We Generate Truly Random Numbers?

Next, you might be wondering: Is it possible to generate truly random numbers?
To generate truly random numbers, we would have to use an external physical variable that is unpredictable. This is also known as a Hardware Random Number Generator.

One source of unpredictability is subatomic particles. At a quantum level, they have completely random behaviour, making them a good physical source of randomness.
Another example would be that in Cloudflare, lava lamps are used as a source of randomness because they are consistently random and never take the same shape twice.

Conclusion

To conclude, the numbers generated by our software are not truly random because our software are deterministic. To get a truly random number, we would have to use a physical source of randomness, such as the behaviour of subatomic particles or images of constantly moving lava lamps.

Top comments (4)

Collapse
 
jonrandy profile image
Jon Randy 🎖️

True randomness is a theoretical concept. Getting the number from a physical source is probably much closer to the impossible ideal, but still not truly random

Collapse
 
jyorien profile image
Joey Lim

Hi and thanks for your comment! I do agree that it might not be possible to be 100% truly random because for example, it might be possible (although with a really small chance) for a set of lava lamps to repeat the same pattern at the exact same time again. However, I believe that the probability of this happening is really low and thus insignificant.
On the other hand, when we take randomness from naturally occurring events that are unaffected by external factors like radioactive decay and values of quantum properties, I believe they do fit our definition of being "truly random" which is to be unpredictable and not having a sequence of events we can follow to reach the same result. But I will take your response into consideration to improve this article, thank you!

Collapse
 
jonrandy profile image
Jon Randy 🎖️

You miss my point - there would be nothing wrong with a sequence repeating in a truly random sequence... that's exactly the point - any sequence is possible at any time. A truly random sequence would be totally independent of outside influence and totally unpredictable. Anything that depends on outside factors or events (that can be predicted) cannot be truly random. Just because we do not yet have the knowledge or expertise to predict some natural occurrences does not make them truly random.

Thread Thread
 
jyorien profile image
Joey Lim

Ahh okay I see your point. I never thought of it like that. Thank you for explaining!