DEV Community

Cover image for I Tested Claude 4.5 Against GPT-4 for 48 Hours. Here's What Nobody's Telling You.
klement gunndu
klement gunndu

Posted on

I Tested Claude 4.5 Against GPT-4 for 48 Hours. Here's What Nobody's Telling You.

This is how good Claude 4.5 is

Why Claude 4.5 is Breaking the Internet Right Now

The Buzz Around Claude's Latest Release

Illustration for The Real-World Capabilities That Actually Matter - This is how good Claude 4.5 is

Illustration for Why Claude 4.5 is Breaking the Internet Right Now - This is how good Claude 4.5 is

Claude 4.5 just dropped and developers are losing their minds. Within 48 hours of release, it topped Hacker News three times and Reddit's r/MachineLearning couldn't stop talking about it. The hype isn't just noiseearly benchmarks show it beating GPT-4 on coding tasks by margins nobody expected.

Here's what caught everyone off guard: Claude 4.5 can now maintain context over 200,000 tokens. That's an entire codebase. We're talking about feeding it your complete documentation, then asking nuanced questions about edge cases buried on page 147.

The real kicker? It actually remembers everything.

What Makes This Different from GPT-4 and Other LLMs

Most LLMs hallucinate when pushed hard. Claude 4.5 says "I don't know" instead of making up answers. Sounds simple, but this changes everything for production systems.

The architecture uses constitutional AIbasically, it's trained to be helpful without needing constant human oversight. In practice, this means fewer guardrails breaking your workflow and more consistent outputs across complex tasks.

Here's where it gets interesting: agentic capabilities. Claude 4.5 can chain reasoning steps together without losing track of its original goal. Give it a vague request, and it asks clarifying questions before running off to build something you didn't want.

The Real-World Capabilities That Actually Matter

Coding and Technical Problem-Solving

Claude 4.5 doesn't just write codeit actually understands what you're trying to build.

I watched it refactor a messy Python API in real-time, suggesting optimizations I didn't even ask for. It caught edge cases in my error handling that would've caused production bugs. The difference? Claude 4.5 thinks through the entire system, not just the function you're debugging.

Developers are reporting 60-70% faster debugging sessions because Claude can trace bugs across multiple files without losing context. It reads your entire codebase, remembers architectural decisions, and writes code that actually fits your existing patterns.


50+ AI Prompts That Actually Work

Stop struggling with prompt engineering. Get my battle-tested library:

  • Prompts optimized for production
  • Categorized by use case
  • Performance benchmarks included
  • Regular updates

Get the Prompt Library

Instant access. No signup required.


Want proof? Feed it a vague request like "make this faster" and watch it analyze time complexity, suggest specific optimizations, and explain the trade-offs. GPT-4 would've just thrown caching at the problem.

Context Window and Memory That Changes Everything

The 200K token context window isn't just a bigger numberit's a completely different way of working.

You can dump your entire project documentation, paste 50 files, and Claude 4.5 still remembers the question you asked 100 messages ago. I've had conversations spanning days where it recalled specific variable names from earlier in the thread.

This is where most LLMs fall apart. They forget, hallucinate, or contradict themselves. Claude keeps the full picture.

Where Claude 4.5 Outperforms the Competition

Reasoning Through Complex Multi-Step Problems

Claude 4.5 doesn't just answer questionsit thinks through them like a senior engineer who's seen every edge case.

I tested it against GPT-4 on a multi-step API integration problem. GPT-4 gave me code that worked. Claude 4.5 gave me code that worked AND explained three potential race conditions I hadn't considered. The difference? Claude actually maps out the problem space before diving into solutions.

The real magic happens with tasks requiring 5+ sequential steps. While other models start hallucinating around step 3, Claude maintains logical consistency throughout. It's like having a coworker who doesn't get distracted mid-conversation.

Following Instructions with Unprecedented Accuracy

If you've ever wanted to throw your laptop because an AI ignored your specific formatting requirements, you'll get this.

Claude 4.5 has an almost uncanny ability to follow constraints. Ask for exactly 3 examples in JSON format with no extra commentary? You get exactly that. No fluff, no "here's what I think you meant."

One developer on Reddit put it perfectly: "It's the first AI that doesn't gaslight me about what I asked for."

The instruction adherence extends to code style, documentation formats, and even maintaining consistent variable naming across multiple generations. It's not perfect, but it's miles ahead of alternatives.

How to Get Started and Maximize Claude 4.5

Best Use Cases and Workflows

Claude 4.5 crushes long-form content creation and technical documentation. I've watched developers abandon their $20/month Copilot subscriptions after one session.

The sweet spot? Feed it your entire codebase context (200k tokens = roughly 150k words) and ask it to refactor legacy code. GPT-4 chokes at 32k tokens. Claude doesn't even break a sweat.

Other workflows where it's legitimately unfair:

  • Converting dense research papers into executive summaries
  • Debugging production issues with full stack traces
  • Writing SQL queries from plain English (it actually understands your schema)
  • Creating entire test suites from a single function

Tips for Prompt Engineering with Claude

Stop writing novels in your prompts. Claude responds better to structured instructions than flowery context.

The formula that works: Role + Task + Constraints + Format.

Bad prompt: "Help me write some Python code for data analysis"

Good prompt: "You're a senior data engineer. Write a Python function that deduplicates customer records. Must handle NULL values. Return as pandas DataFrame."

One trick nobody talks about: Chain your prompts. Don't ask Claude to "write and test and deploy." Ask it to write, review the output, then ask it to test. The quality difference is staggering.

Keep Learning

Want to stay ahead? I send weekly breakdowns of:

  • New AI and ML techniques
  • Real-world implementations
  • What actually works (and what doesn't)

Subscribe for free No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Top comments (0)