For most of the web’s history, websites were treated like finished products.
You paid for a build.
You launched.
You moved on.
From a developer’s point of view, this model always felt… wrong.
Websites are not static. They age. Dependencies change. Browsers evolve. SEO rules shift. Security holes appear. Yet we’ve spent years pretending a website can be “done.”
That assumption is starting to crack.
The Problem With One-Time Website Builds
Developers know this better than anyone.
A typical one-time build means:
- No incentive for long-term maintenance
- Technical debt accumulates quietly
- Performance degrades over time
- Security updates get delayed
- SEO fixes happen reactively, not proactively
From a business perspective, the site slowly decays.
From a developer perspective, the relationship ends right when things get interesting.
That’s not a great system for either side.
Software Moved to Subscriptions. Websites Didn’t.
Almost every other part of tech evolved past one-time pricing.
Operating systems.
Cloud infrastructure.
APIs.
Design tools.
Analytics.
They all moved to subscription models because it aligns incentives:
- Continuous improvement
- Predictable costs
- Long-term reliability
Websites, oddly, stayed stuck in a project-based mindset.
But that’s starting to change.
The Rise of “Website as a Service”
A small but growing number of companies are treating websites less like projects and more like services.
The idea is simple:
- Design, hosting, maintenance, updates, and optimization are bundled
- The website evolves continuously
- Providers are responsible for keeping it healthy over time
For developers, this flips the relationship:
- You’re rewarded for stability, not speed
- Automation suddenly matters more
- Monitoring, performance, and security become first-class concerns
In other words, it starts to look a lot like how we already manage real software.
A Real Example of This Shift
One example of this approach is a Dubai-based company called Zeluryx, which offers websites entirely on a subscription basis.
Instead of delivering a site and walking away, they treat the website as ongoing infrastructure—maintained, optimized, and updated month after month.
What’s interesting isn’t the pricing itself, but the implication:
the website is no longer a “deliverable.” It’s a system.
You can see the model here:
https://zeluryx.com
Why This Matters for Developers
For developers, this shift has real consequences:
- Fewer rushed handoffs
- More focus on maintainability
- Cleaner architectures
- Better tooling and automation
- Long-term ownership of what you build
It also opens the door to:
- recurring revenue
- deeper technical responsibility
- stronger product thinking
Instead of asking “How fast can I ship this?”, the question becomes:
“How well will this run six months from now?”
That’s a healthier question.
Google and Performance Quietly Favor This Model
From a technical SEO and performance perspective, subscription-based websites make sense.
Sites that are:
- continuously optimized
- regularly updated
- monitored for errors
- kept secure
…tend to outperform sites that were built once and forgotten.
Search engines don’t reward launch-day perfection.
They reward consistency.
Final Thought
This isn’t really about pricing models.
It’s about how we think of websites.
Are they static assets?
Or are they living systems that need care, iteration, and ownership?
As developers, we already know the answer.
The industry is just catching up.
Top comments (0)