DEV Community

Loopkit Labs
Loopkit Labs

Posted on

Day 2 of validating 10 SaaS ideas with ₹0: 0 signups, what we changed

Yesterday we put up 10 landing pages, each with a price and a 'would you pay?' question. Result so far: 0 signups.

That's not a verdict, it's a traffic problem. Nobody has seen the pages yet.

What we changed:

  • Stopped posting the same link everywhere. Communities hate that.
  • Started answering real questions on Quora and Pinterest with useful tips first, link last, with a clear disclosure.
  • Queued free launches on TinyLaunch and Launching Next.

Rule we're keeping: build only the idea that gets 5+ people saying they'd pay.

If you're a freelancer who chases late invoices, which tool would you actually pay for? Our pages are linked in the first post: https://dev.to/loopkitlabs/were-testing-10-saas-ideas-with-0-before-writing-any-code-3900

We'll post the numbers again in a few days.

Top comments (2)

Collapse
 
mohith_kumar_05846f3211f3 profile image
Mohith kumar •

Respect for publishing 0 signups on day 2. One thought on the "would you pay?" question: it tends to get no answer or a polite one. Asking what people use today and what it costs them gets more replies and says more about willingness to pay. I built chatform.in for this kind of test, a form that follows up when the answer is vague.

Collapse
 
officialmailkr profile image
오피셜메일 •

신청 0건을 곧바로 수요 부재로 해석하지 않고 노출 부족과 구분한 점이 좋습니다. 다만 5명이 “돈 낼 의향이 있다”고 말하는 것과 실제 구매는 다를 수 있으니, 각 페이지의 방문 수·유입 경로·가격 확인·신청을 함께 기록하면 다음 판단이 더 선명해질 것 같아요. 같은 링크를 반복해서 뿌리지 않고 질문에 먼저 답하는 기준도 중요해 보입니다.