DEV Community

Cover image for Streamlined Development: Asynchronous Reviews for Incremental Changes
Insight Lighthouse
Insight Lighthouse

Posted on

Streamlined Development: Asynchronous Reviews for Incremental Changes

🤖 Disclaimer: This content is the product of a harmonious collaboration between human creativity and AI's analytical prowess.

Ever felt bogged down by traditional code reviews that seem to drag on forever? Imagine a development process where asynchronous feedback and incremental changes come together, paving the way for agility and efficiency. Dive into this guide to discover a fresh approach that redefines the boundaries of code collaboration and deployment.

1. Branch Off the Main

  • Purpose: Ensure the main branch remains stable.
  • Action: Developers create a branch from the main for each new task.

2. Focus on Small, Incremental Changes

  • Purpose: Simplify code integration and review.
  • Action: Implement a basic test and corresponding code to pass it.

3. Push the Branch

  • Purpose: Start the CI/CD process.
  • Action: Push the branch to the remote repository.

4. Initiate Automated Checks

  • Purpose: Maintain code quality.
  • Action: On push, the CI/CD system, e.g., GitHub Actions, triggers checks on altered lines/files.

5. Conditional Automatic Merging

  • Purpose: Speed up code integration.
  • Action: If tests pass, the system auto-merges the branch into the main.

6. Deployment Block with Implicit Dual Review

  • Purpose: Use comments as a gate to ensure human-reviewed quality.
  • Action: Anyone can comment or address comments. However, for deployment to proceed, every comment must be marked as resolved. A non-author must leave a comment and a different non-author must mark it as resolved.

7. Release to Production

  • Purpose: Deliver quality code to end-users.
  • Action: After comments are resolved, the CI/CD system deploys changes to production.

Conclusion

In a tech landscape that often prioritizes speed, the methodology presented here champions a balance. It underscores the essential interplay between automated processes and the irreplaceable touch of human oversight through a dual-reviewer system. This strategy is more than just efficient development; it's about upholding quality, fostering collaboration, and ensuring that every piece of code is a testament to excellence. While there might be challenges in fully realizing this approach, its transformative potential for software development practices is profound. As you reflect on these insights, consider: how might they reshape your own development workflows?

Image of Timescale

🚀 pgai Vectorizer: SQLAlchemy and LiteLLM Make Vector Search Simple

We built pgai Vectorizer to simplify embedding management for AI applications—without needing a separate database or complex infrastructure. Since launch, developers have created over 3,000 vectorizers on Timescale Cloud, with many more self-hosted.

Read full post →

Top comments (0)

Sentry image

See why 4M developers consider Sentry, “not bad.”

Fixing code doesn’t have to be the worst part of your day. Learn how Sentry can help.

Learn more