DEV Community

Maksym
Maksym

Posted on • Edited on

Python vs JavaScript: Speed, Sorting, and Performance Compared

#python #javascript #programming

mastodons on arena
When developers discuss Python vs JavaScript, one topic always comes up: speed. Python is loved for simplicity, JavaScript for ubiquity — but how do they compare when we get down to performance, especially with tasks like sorting?

🐍 Python vs 📜 JavaScript: The Big Picture

  • Python

    • Interpreted language, runs on the CPython interpreter by default.
    • Emphasizes readability and developer productivity.
    • Often slower than JavaScript for raw computations, but highly optimized libraries (NumPy, pandas) make it competitive for data-heavy tasks.

  • JavaScript

    • Interpreted/compiled via modern JIT engines (V8 in Chrome/Node.js, SpiderMonkey in Firefox).
    • Optimized for performance in web environments.
    • Generally faster for raw algorithmic tasks like sorting, searching, and loops.

🔢 Sorting Algorithms in Practice

Both Python and JavaScript have built-in sort functions:

  • Python: 
arr = [5, 2, 9, 1, 5, 6]
arr.sort()
print(arr)  # [1, 2, 5, 5, 6, 9]
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Python uses Timsort — a hybrid algorithm (merge sort + insertion sort).
Complexity: O(n log n) on average, but highly optimized for partially sorted data.

  • JavaScript: 
let arr = [5, 2, 9, 1, 5, 6];
arr.sort((a, b) => a - b);
console.log(arr); // [1, 2, 5, 5, 6, 9]
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

JavaScript engines (V8, SpiderMonkey) also use Timsort for arrays of numbers and strings.
Complexity: O(n log n), with similar optimizations.

👉 Both languages converge on Timsort, meaning built-in sort performance is surprisingly similar in algorithmic efficiency.

⚡ Benchmarking Python vs JavaScript Sorting

Let’s take an array of 1,000,000 random integers.

  • Python (CPython 3.11) 
import random, time
arr = [random.randint(0, 10**6) for _ in range(10**6)]
start = time.time()
arr.sort()
print("Python sort:", time.time() - start, "seconds")
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
  • JavaScript (Node.js v20) 
const arr = Array.from({length: 1_000_000}, () => Math.floor(Math.random() * 1e6));
console.time("JS sort");
arr.sort((a, b) => a - b);
console.timeEnd("JS sort");
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Typical results (on a modern laptop):
Python: ~0.35–0.5 seconds
JavaScript: ~0.2–0.3 seconds

➡️ JavaScript is usually faster by ~30–40% due to V8’s JIT compilation and optimizations.

🚀 Beyond Sorting: General Performance

  • Loops & Raw Computation:
    JavaScript is faster thanks to V8’s JIT compiler, which optimizes hot code paths at runtime.

  • Math & Data Processing:
    Python can catch up (or beat JS) when using libraries like NumPy, which run in C under the hood.

  • Asynchronous Tasks:
    JavaScript shines with its event loop and async/await model.
    Python has asyncio, but JavaScript is more natively designed for async I/O.

🏁 So Which is Faster?

  • For raw algorithms (sorting, searching, loops) → JavaScript usually wins.
  • For data-heavy tasks (ML, data science, math) → Python wins with its optimized C-backed libraries.
  • In real projects → Choice depends more on ecosystem than micro-benchmarks.

🎯 Conclusion

  • Both Python and JavaScript use Timsort for sorting — giving them similar algorithmic efficiency.
  • JavaScript runs faster in most general-purpose benchmarks due to V8’s JIT.
  • Python excels when you leverage libraries optimized in C.

👉 If you care about speed for raw algorithms: go with JavaScript.
👉 If you care about productivity, readability, and data science: go with Python.

Please feel free to express your opinion and criticize this article.

Top comments (0)