DEV Community

Cover image for The shift from "Infrastructure as Code" to "Infrastructure as Software."
Meena Nukala
Meena Nukala

Posted on

The shift from "Infrastructure as Code" to "Infrastructure as Software."

Beyond the YAML: Why the Future of DevOps is Infrastructure as Software
If you’ve been in the DevOps space for more than a minute, you know the drill: you start with a simple Terraform file, and two years later, you’re drowning in a sea of nested YAML files and copy-pasted HCL modules.
We call it Infrastructure as Code (IaC), but let’s be honest—traditional IaC often feels more like "Infrastructure as Configuration."
Today, we’re seeing a shift toward Infrastructure as Software (IaS). Here’s why this shift is happening and how it changes the way we build.

  1. The "YAML Wall" Most DevOps tools rely on declarative languages. While these are great for simple setups, they struggle with:
    • Logic: Implementing a simple if/else or a complex loop often requires hacky workarounds.
    • Abstraction: Creating reusable components usually means managing massive, rigid modules.
    • Testing: How do you unit test a YAML file? (Spoiler: It’s not fun).
  2. Enter Infrastructure as Software (IaS) Tools like Pulumi or the AWS CDK allow developers to define infrastructure using general-purpose programming languages like TypeScript, Python, or Go. Why this matters:
    • True Abstractions: You can use classes, interfaces, and functions to package your infrastructure logic.
    • The IDE Experience: You get autocomplete, type checking, and linting out of the box.
    • Testing: You can use standard testing frameworks (like Jest or Pytest) to verify your infrastructure before it ever touches the cloud.
  3. A Practical Comparison Imagine you need to create three S3 buckets with specific naming conventions. The Old Way (Pseudo-YAML/HCL): resource "aws_s3_bucket" "bucket" { count = 3 bucket = "my-app-data-${count.index}" }

The New Way (TypeScript with Pulumi/CDK):
const buckets = ["web", "api", "logs"].map(name => {
return new s3.Bucket(my-app-${name}, {
versioning: { enabled: true }
});
});

The second example isn't just shorter; it’s extensible. You can wrap that logic in a function and share it across your entire organization as an NPM package.

  1. Should You Switch? Before you delete your Terraform providers, consider the trade-offs: | Feature | Infrastructure as Code (YAML/HCL) | Infrastructure as Software (TS/Python/Go) | |---|---|---| | Learning Curve | Low (easy to read) | Higher (requires coding skills) | | Flexibility | Limited by DSL | Unlimited | | Maintenance | High "State" complexity | High "Dependency" complexity | | Best For | Static, simple environments | Dynamic, complex, or large-scale apps | Conclusion The goal of DevOps has always been to break down silos. By moving infrastructure into the same languages our developers use, we aren't just managing servers; we’re building better software systems. What are you using in your stack right now? Are you staying with the reliability of Terraform, or are you moving toward the flexibility of Pulumi/CDK? Let’s chat in the comments! #DevOps #CloudComputing #InfrastructureAsCode #Programming Tips for posting on dev.to:
    • Use a catchy cover image: You can generate one or use a high-quality tech stock photo.
    • Engagement: Respond to the first few comments you get; it boosts the article in the "Top" feed.
    • Series: If this is part of a larger project, use the series: tag in the front matter to link them together. Would you like me to generate a specific technical tutorial for a tool like Docker, Kubernetes, or GitHub Actions instead?

Top comments (0)