DEV Community

Cover image for A Deep-Dive Comparison for No-Code App Development (2025)
Alex for Momen

Posted on

1 1 1 1 1

A Deep-Dive Comparison for No-Code App Development (2025)

As developers, we often need to make strategic decisions about which tools to use for different projects. In the no-code space, three platforms stand out: Bubble, Softr, and Momen. Let's break down their capabilities from a technical perspective.

TL;DR πŸš€

  • Bubble: Great for complex, customized applications with extensive plugin support
  • Softr: Excellent for rapid business tool development, especially with existing data
  • Momen: Superior database performance (100k rows/20s) with scalability focus

Database Architecture & Performance πŸ“Š

Database Operations

Platform Database Type Performance Rating Import Speed (100k rows)
Bubble PostgreSQL (Built-in) ⭐⭐⭐⭐ > 60 seconds
Softr External Only ⭐⭐ Depends on integration
Momen PostgreSQL (Built-in) ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ~20 seconds

Detailed Database Analysis

Softr's Integration-First Approach

Available Database Integrations

  • Spreadsheets: 'Google Sheets', 'Airtable'
  • Databases:'MySQL', 'PostgreSQL', 'MS SQL Server','MariaDB', 'BigQuery', 'SupaBase'

Limitations:

  • Multiple connections needed for complex operations
  • Airtable record limit (125,000 per base)
  • Performance depends on external service

Bubble's Built-in Solution

  • PostgreSQL on Amazon RDS
  • Visual database interface
  • No SQL knowledge required
  • Performance issues with large datasets:
  // Performance Example
  const bulkUpdate = {
    records: 10000,
    executionTime: '> 60 seconds',
    limitations: ['WU consumption', 'Timeout risks']
  };
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Momen's High-Performance Architecture

// Performance Metrics
const momenPerformance = {
  bulkImport: {
    records: 100000,
    time: '20 seconds'
  },
  bulkUpdate: {
    records: 'Large datasets',
    time: '5 seconds'
  },
  relationships: ['one-to-one', 'one-to-many', 'many-to-many']
};
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Development Experience πŸ‘©β€πŸ’»

Component System

Platform Approach Learning Curve
Bubble Drag-and-drop with extensive component library Steep
Softr Block-based system Gentle
Momen Drag-and-drop with customizable components Moderate

Key Technical Considerations πŸ”§

  1. Data Scale Requirements

    • Small-scale: Any platform works
    • Medium-scale: Bubble or Momen
    • Large-scale: Momen recommended
  2. Integration Needs

    • Softr: Best for existing Airtable/Google Sheets setups
    • Bubble: Extensive plugin marketplace
    • Momen: Strong native capabilities with external integration options
  3. Performance Priority

    • High-performance needs: Momen
    • Balanced approach: Bubble
    • Integration-focused: Softr

Conclusion 🎯

  • Choose Momen for performance-critical applications with complex data relationships
  • Choose Bubble for feature-rich applications where ultimate performance isn't critical
  • Choose Softr when working with existing data sources and simpler use cases

Check the full comparison here: https://momen.app/blogs/bubble-vs-softr/

Sentry image

See why 4M developers consider Sentry, β€œnot bad.”

Fixing code doesn’t have to be the worst part of your day. Learn how Sentry can help.

Learn more

Top comments (0)

Cloudinary image

Zoom pan, gen fill, restore, overlay, upscale, crop, resize...

Chain advanced transformations through a set of image and video APIs while optimizing assets by 90%.

Explore

πŸ‘‹ Kindness is contagious

Please leave a ❀️ or a friendly comment on this post if you found it helpful!

Okay