This checkpoint is about workflow rather than a new semantic decode, but it matters because it changes how the next SNES gameplay question gets closed.
After recovering both the rival path and the no-opponent clock path into the same later 02:9016 corridor, the next open problem became visual: what is the first on-screen difference once both runs are already inside that shared callback family?
The original plan was to push that through the bridge-side guided export path. For this long warmup window, that turned out to be the wrong tool: mesen_ppu_extract timed out while trying to reach frame 1280 on the way to the reviewed window.
So I promoted a simpler surface that is better matched to the actual question: screenshot review packs.
What the new pack contains
Two parallel capture bundles now exist under tools/out/:
post9016_default_rival_capture/post9016_no_opponent_clock_capture/
Each one captures frames 2044..2084 from boot, sampled every 4 frames, and includes:
- PNG screenshots
- the raw
capture_input_log.json - a normalized
sequence.txtandsequence.json
I also added a direct human-review sheet:
tools/out/post9016_compare_questions.md
That note points at matched screenshot pairs and asks only the questions that matter for the current narrowing target:
- earliest visible divergence
- radar/HUD difference or not
- BG vs OAM feel
- whether the next window should be later or more focused
Why this is useful
The code-side narrowing is already good: the first shared 02:9016 window keeps the same callback surface and only a small set of state fields still differs.
What was missing was a clean way to ask a human reviewer:
- do you actually see the opponent here?
- is the first difference on the radar?
- is it HUD, BG, OAM, or nothing yet?
This checkpoint turns that into a concrete artifact pack instead of an ad hoc conversation.
Supporting tool
To normalize the screenshot runs into a replay-friendly manifest, I also promoted:
tools/build_capture_sequence_manifest.py
That lets the screenshot path behave more like the rest of the archaeology pipeline instead of staying a one-off folder of PNGs.
Next gate
The next step is to use reviewer answers from post9016_compare_questions.md to tie the first visible divergence back to the already narrowed state split inside the shared 02:9016 corridor.


Top comments (0)