LangChain is a developer framework for connecting large language models with data, tools, and application logic. This guide walks through a practical step-by-step workflow to build a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) document chat: upload documents, chunk and embed them, store embeddings in a vector database, and serve a chat UI that answers only from retrieved context. Use this as a checklist and hands-on recipe for production-style LLM applications.
Here is my complete hands-on video guide below.
Below is the complete code repo to try
LangChain RAG Application (DocChat Pro)
This repository contains a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) application built using LangChain, Streamlit, and SingleStore. The app allows you to upload documents (PDF, TXT, or Markdown), automatically chunk and embed them, store embeddings in SingleStore as a persistent vector database, and chat with your documents using a ChatGPT-like interface.
The project demonstrates how LangChain connects document loading, text splitting, embeddings, retrieval, and prompt templates into a reliable AI workflow. It also includes source citations, retrieval debugging, and a reset option for clean demos.
This is a practical, production-style example of building a real AI application—not a toy chatbot.
How LangChain evolved
Before LangChain, developers used LLMs mainly via standalone prompts. That approach left large gaps: no built-in data connectors, no standard way to persist embeddings, limited support for multi-step logic, and no standardized memory or agent tooling. LangChain was created to fill these gaps by providing composable primitives and patterns for LLM-powered apps.
Key milestones in LangChain's evolution:
- Open-source modular library that standardizes document loading, splitting, embeddings, and retrievers.
- Agent and chain patterns that let you sequence LLM calls and tool invocations in reproducible workflows.
- Integrations with vector databases, hosts, and model providers to avoid vendor lock-in.
- Growth in community and tooling, with managed runtimes and observability emerging around LangChain patterns.
Why use LangChain and when it matters
LangChain is a developer framework that makes it easy to build LLM-powered applications by connecting language models to data sources, vector stores, prompts, memory, and tools. It is not an LLM itself; it is the scaffolding that turns LLMs into reliable, maintainable systems.
LangChain is useful when you need LLM responses tied to custom, up-to-date, or proprietary data and when you want predictable, auditable results. Instead of relying purely on prompt tweaks or costly fine-tuning, LangChain helps you assemble components - loaders, splitters, embeddings, vector stores, retrievers, chains, and prompts - into a repeatable pipeline.
Core LangChain components - overview
LangChain organizes common functionality into composable components. Understanding each component helps you design correct, debuggable applications.
LLMs (model interfaces)
The LLM component is a thin adapter that calls a model provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, local models, etc.). LangChain gives a uniform API so you can swap models without rewriting the rest of your app.
Loaders and Indexes
Loaders ingest documents (PDFs, HTML, text, spreadsheets). Index-like modules prepare content for retrieval by preserving metadata and mapping pieces of text to retrievable records.
Text splitters and chunking
Splitters break long documents into chunks sized to fit model context windows. Proper chunking balances context completeness and retrieval precision.
Embeddings
Embedding models convert text chunks and queries into numeric vectors that capture semantic meaning. LangChain wraps embedding providers so you can change models consistently.
Vector stores (vector databases)
Vector stores persist embeddings and support similarity search. LangChain provides connectors for many vector databases and vector-enabled SQL stores.
Retrievers
Retrievers are configurable search layers that use embedding similarity, filters, or hybrid search to fetch relevant chunks for a query.
Chains
Chains are sequences of modular steps: call a retriever, format a prompt, call an LLM, post-process the answer. Chains let you compose robust workflows with predictable behavior.
Agents and tools
Agents combine LLM reasoning with tool execution (APIs, calculators, search). LangChain includes patterns for creating agent loops with toolkits and stopping conditions.
Memory
Memory modules manage conversation state - short-term for session context and long-term for persistent user data. Memory is essential for chat experiences that require context continuity.
Prompt templates
Prompt templates are reusable instruction blueprints. They standardize system messages, user instructions, and context injection to make outputs predictable and auditable.
Tutorial: What we will build?
A typical LangChain RAG pipeline contains these stages. Plan them before writing code:
- Document ingestion and metadata extraction.
- Text splitting and chunking strategy (size, overlap).
- Embedding generation with a chosen embedding model.
- Store embeddings in a vector store with metadata.
- Query embedding and retrieval (top-K, filters).
- Construct a prompt combining retrieved context and user query.
- LLM response generation and attribution (sources/similarity scores).
Step 1: Define scope, data, and success criteria
Before coding, decide:
- Data types: PDFs, DOCX, HTML, CSV, internal wiki pages.
- Latency and scale: number of documents and query QPS.
- Accuracy expectations: must answers strictly cite docs or can it hallucinate?
- Monitoring: logs for retrieval results, source hits, and LLM outputs.
Step 2: Environment and core libraries
Install the core packages and provider SDKs. Replace provider names with your chosen LLM and vector DB.
pip install langchain streamlit openai singlestoredb[client] tiktoken
Set environment variables securely for API keys and vector DB credentials (do not commit .env to source control).
Step 3: Ingest documents and split into chunks
Goal: convert each input document into coherent chunks that fit the model's context window and preserve meaning.
Recommended splitter settings
- Chunk size: 500–1000 tokens (or 800–1200 characters depending on language)
- Chunk overlap: 100–200 tokens to preserve context across splits
- Prefer semantic boundaries (sections, paragraphs) over fixed-length cuts when possible
Example ingestion pattern (pseudo-real code using LangChain idioms):
Step 4: Create embeddings and store them in a vector database
Convert text chunks into vectors with an embedding model and persist them to a vector store. Choose a persistent vector DB (SingleStore, Pinecone, Milvus, Chroma, etc.) for production.
Important metadata to store with each vector:
- source document id or file name
- chunk index or position
- original text snippet for provenance
- timestamp or ingestion batch id
Generic embedding + store pattern:
Notes:
- If using a managed vector DB, create the collection/table with proper indexing (HNSW/IVF etc.).
- Batch embedding calls to improve throughput and reduce cost.
- Store embeddings and text separately if you need to re-embed with another model later.
Step 5: Build the retriever and RAG chain
Core idea: for each user query, run a semantic search against the vector store to retrieve top-k candidate chunks, then pass those chunks plus the query to the LLM with a strict prompt that instructs the model to only use the provided context.
Retriever configuration
- Top-k (k): 3–10 depending on average chunk length
- Similarity metric: cosine is common for OpenAI embeddings
- Filter by metadata: restrict to a document set or date range if needed
Example RAG flow (LangChain style):
Return source documents (or their URLs) to provide citations in the UI and to reduce hallucination risk.
Step 6: Build a simple Streamlit chat UI
Key UI features:
- File upload with immediate "Build / Upsert" button
- Toggles for chunk size, overlap, top-k, and temperature
- Streamed LLM responses plus a sidebar showing retrieved sources and debug info
- Button to reset or drop the knowledge base for demos
Minimal Streamlit sketch (abbreviated):
Show sources next to each answer using the metadata stored with vectors.
Step 7: Tune, test, and monitor
Tuning checklist:
- Adjust chunk_size and chunk_overlap until retrieved contexts are coherent.
- Control the LLM temperature: set to 0.0–0.2 for high factuality.
- Adjust top_k: more context can help but increases prompt length and noise.
- Implement answer gating: if the highest-similarity result score is below a threshold, refuse to answer or escalate to human review.
Monitoring and logs to add:
- Query traces: query, retrieved doc ids, similarity scores.
- LLM outputs and tokens used (cost monitoring).
- Feedback collection UI to flag incorrect answers and retrain or re-curate data.
Common pitfalls and how to avoid them
- Pitfall: Chunking too small. Result: context torn into fragments, leading to wrong or incomplete answers. Fix: increase chunk_size or use semantic splitting.
- Pitfall: Chunk overlap too high. Result: duplicate context leading to longer prompts and higher cost. Fix: balance overlap to preserve transitions only.
- Pitfall: Not storing provenance. Result: impossible to cite or debug answers. Fix: save source filename, page, and chunk id for each vector.
- Pitfall: Open-ended prompts that allow the model to hallucinate. Fix: use strict system prompts and instruct the model to respond "I don't know" when context is insufficient.
- Pitfall: Ignoring vector DB scaling. Fix: plan index parameters and re-shard or re-index as dataset grows.
When to choose fine-tuning or retrieval vs prompt engineering
- Prompt engineering: low cost, best for short-term tweaks and small scope tasks.
- RAG (recommended): best when you need up-to-date, auditable answers tied to documents. It avoids expensive model retraining.
- Fine-tuning: choose for enterprise-level domain adaptation where you control the model and cost/latency tradeoffs, or when you need model-level behavior change not achievable with prompts.
Security and governance considerations
- Encrypt credentials, enforce least privilege for vector DB access.
- Remove or redact sensitive text before storing embeddings when compliance requires it.
- Log queries while respecting privacy and retention policies.
- Provide an allowlist/denylist for documents or terms if needed.
Troubleshooting examples
Low-quality answers despite relevant docs
- Check retriever scores: if similarites are low, embeddings may be mismatched or chunking wrong.
- Increase top_k or expand chunk_overlap to provide more context.
- Ensure embeddings model and similarity metric align (e.g., OpenAI embeddings work well with cosine).
Model drifts or outdated facts
- RAG ensures answers are grounded in indexed docs; re-index documents periodically or on every significant update.
- Prefer real-time ingestion for highly dynamic sources.
Practical checklist before launch
- End-to-end test with representative queries and documents
- Automated unit tests for ingestion and retrieval
- Cost forecast for embeddings and LLM usage
- Monitoring for retrieval hit-rate and source coverage
- Rate limits and graceful degradation for high load
Screenshots and visual debugging
Inspect the UI for upload progress and the vector DB dashboard to verify stored embeddings and metadata.
FAQ
How does LangChain reduce hallucinations?
By combining retrieval (vector search) with generation. The model receives specific, relevant document chunks as context and a strict instruction to answer only from that context. Returning source documents for every answer enables verification and debugging.
Do I need to fine-tune my LLM if I use LangChain?
Not necessarily. For most document-grounded applications, RAG provides strong results without fine-tuning. Fine-tuning is useful if you require model-level behavior changes or want to reduce repeated prompt tokens for very large or high-volume deployments.
What settings matter most for retrieval quality?
Chunk size, chunk overlap, embedding model choice, top-k, and similarity threshold. Also ensure your text splitter preserves semantic boundaries where possible.
Can LangChain switch LLM providers easily?
Yes. LangChain is designed to be provider-neutral: swap LLM and embedding providers by changing the integration class and configuration without rewriting the pipeline logic.
Which vector database should I use?
Choose based on scale and latency needs. For prototypes, lightweight stores FAISS should work. But for production, consider managed or scalable options such as SingleStore. Evaluate costs, persistence, query latency, and SDK maturity.
Summary and next steps
LangChain is a practical framework to build reliable, data-grounded LLM applications. Follow the steps in this guide to ingest documents, create embeddings, persist vectors in a scalable store, and assemble a retriever + LLM pipeline with strict prompts. Focus on chunking, metadata for provenance, and monitoring retrieval quality. Start with a small pilot: upload sample documents, tune chunk settings, and iterate on prompt constraints before scaling.
Ready-to-run components to assemble: a document loader, a robust text splitter, an embeddings layer, a persistent vector store, a retriever, a constrained prompt template, and a lightweight UI. Combine these with monitoring and governance to move from prototype to production.
Top comments (0)