DEV Community

pickuma
pickuma

Posted on Originally published at pickuma.com

Why US companies can block tokenized stocks on OKXICE

Tokenized stocks are blockchain-based versions of ordinary shares. Their trading volume is climbing on overseas platforms, while a growing list of large US companies is formally refusing to have their shares tokenized on a new US venue, according to CNBC. CNBC reports that 16 companies had objected to trading on OKXICE as of Wednesday. They include Goldman Sachs, Microsoft and Alphabet. OKXICE is the venue launched jointly by crypto exchange OKX and NYSE parent Intercontinental Exchange. The split comes down to one rule. The SEC's temporary innovation exemption for tokenized stocks requires that companies be able to object, and the venue must notify each company and then wait 30 days before trading its token.

The background you need

Tokenization means issuing a digital record of an asset on a blockchain. A blockchain is a shared ledger that many computers keep in sync. Once a share exists as a token, it can move between crypto wallets and trade on crypto-style venues. Those venues often run around the clock instead of during exchange hours. Onchain just means the trade or holding is recorded on that ledger rather than in a broker's internal database.

Tokenized stock is a loose label. It covers products that work very differently, and the difference is the whole story here.

  • Perpetual futures (perps) are derivative contracts that track a price and never expire. You get exposure to a stock's price moves, but you own no share. You have no claim on the company and no vote. Venues such as Hyperliquid list them.
  • Wrapped tokens are usually backed by a real share held by some intermediary, who issues a token against it. You hold a claim on the intermediary, not a line on the company's shareholder register. Your rights depend on that intermediary's terms.
  • Issuer-recognized tokenized shares aim to make the token the share itself, or a direct equivalent, with the company's involvement. This is what the US framework is trying to enable.

The issuer is the company whose shares are being represented. Ordinary shares come with shareholder rights: dividends, and usually a vote at shareholder meetings. Whether a token carries those rights is not automatic. It depends on how the token is built.

An analogy helps. Think of US depositary receipts for foreign stocks. Some are sponsored: the foreign company works with a bank to create them. Others are unsponsored: a bank creates them without the company's participation. Both let you trade exposure to the company. Only one has the company at the table. Offshore perps and wrapped tokens sit closer to the unsponsored model. The US exemption pushes toward the sponsored model by giving companies a veto. The analogy has limits, though. Depositary receipts run through regulated banks and established rules. Many offshore tokens and perps sit outside that kind of oversight. A perp is also a derivative, not a receipt for a share at all.

The question of rights is not abstract. CNBC notes that the debate came into focus in September after a public fight between the CEOs of Robinhood and AMC over Robinhood's stock-token model.

What actually changed

Offshore trading in tokenized equities is not new. CNBC describes it as concentrated overseas, where these products are more widely available. What is new is the scale of the numbers and the arrival of a US pathway.

On volume, CNBC cites a quarterly staking report from Bitwise Asset Management. It says tokenized stock volume on Robinhood Chain, Robinhood's newly launched network, went from $526 million in July to $2.21 billion in August and $11.31 billion in September. The same report says non-crypto markets made up 36.5% of Hyperliquid's perpetuals volume that quarter, up from 32.7% the quarter before. It also says tokenized equities were the fastest-growing category on Solana.

On the US side, CNBC reports that the SEC last month issued an innovation exemption. It creates a temporary pathway for tokenized stocks and requires that companies be able to object. The process runs like this, per CNBC:

  1. OKXICE disclosed on Oct. 4 that it would make more than 60 tokenized stocks available.
  2. The venue must notify each company of its intention to tokenize the company's shares.
  3. Trading in a token can start only 30 days after the company receives that notice.
  4. Companies can object during that process. OKXICE posted a public notice Monday adding Goldman Sachs, Microsoft, Qualcomm, Caterpillar, McDonald's, Western Digital and Alphabet to earlier objectors, which included CoreWeave, UnitedHealth, Broadcom, Applied Digital, AppLovin and Cerebras.

CNBC adds a caveat. The objections do not mean these companies will reject tokenization by every party. They signal resistance to this particular model and venue.

What it means for developers who invest on the side

The key point is that consent is now a design input. Offshore, as Injective COO Mirza Uddin put it to CNBC, most activity is price exposure through perps and wrapped tokens that "never needed a company's permission." The US framework tries to put real shares onchain, and that gives issuers a say. So rising offshore volume and US objections are not contradictory signals. They describe two different products.

For you, that turns into concrete checks.

  • Identify the product type. Is it a perp, a wrapped token, or an issuer-recognized share? Volume figures like the Bitwise numbers do not separate these for you.
  • Read the rights terms. Do you get dividends? Votes? A claim on an actual share, or only on an intermediary?
  • Look at the objection list on the venue. Under the US exemption, a company's objection changes what can trade on OKXICE. It says nothing about the company's business.

The two people CNBC quotes read the split differently. Uddin frames it around what is being traded offshore versus in the US. ClearStreet analyst Owen Lau argues the split is not about geography at all. He says it is "driven by investors versus issuers," with demand present globally. Lau expects that some companies will eventually not object. He points to benefits such as a wider investor base, 24/7 access, more distribution channels, direct dividend payments and cost savings. He suggests that some beaten-down stocks with low trading volume could be good candidates.

OKXICE co-chairman Andrew Cuomo said in a statement that the company always expected many firms to wait and see rather than go first. He added that the SEC model has limits on how many companies can participate and on the volume that can be traded.

Things to watch next:

  • Which of the 60-plus announced names finish their 30-day windows without objecting
  • Whether the participation and volume limits Cuomo mentioned bind in practice
  • Whether offshore volume keeps rising in later Bitwise reports

A token with a familiar ticker is not proof you own that company's stock. Offshore perps and many wrapped tokens track price without the company's involvement. Your rights come from the product's terms, not from the logo on it.

What we don't know yet

  • Why each company objected. CNBC reports the objections. It does not report each company's stated reasons. Uddin's view that issuers see all risk and no upside is his characterization, not a statement from the companies.
  • The exact caps. Cuomo mentions limits on participating companies and on volume, but the reports give no figures.
  • How long the exemption lasts. CNBC calls the pathway temporary without saying what comes after it.
  • What drove the Robinhood Chain jump. The Bitwise figures show the growth, but the sources do not explain its cause.
  • Voting rights. The sources describe the voting question as unresolved. They do not say how OKXICE tokens will handle it.

Originally published at pickuma.com. Subscribe to the RSS or follow @pickuma.bsky.social for new reviews.

Top comments (0)