Is it right to consider GraphQL API a specific form of a REST API? What I read here and know about REST makes me think, yes, but I'd love to hear others' views on the topic. This is not a query for is-one-better-than-the-other arguments.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Top comments (2)
No I don't think you can consider GraphQL to be a kind of REST, since it doesn't follow the precepts of REST:
The only real overlap is that GraphQL typically uses http (though it doesn't really require that, conceptually) and a JSON-like syntax (just as actual JSON tends to be the preferred REST body syntax).
You might be interested in this, as I used to.
Please explain, what is HATEOAS?
Pacharapol Withayasakpunt ・ Aug 9 ・ 1 min read
"GraphQL vs REST" is ill-typed
Corey O'Connor ・ Oct 25 '19 ・ 3 min read