DeepSeek suspended my account three times. No cause stated. No appeal outcome. September 25. October 13. October 14 — and each one escalated: the first left my conversations visible, the second and third closed the door entirely.
The first time it happened, I panicked. The second time, I documented it. The third time, I didn't stop working.
Here's why: on September 22 — three days before the first suspension — a scheduled export ran. 127 conversations. 8.2 million characters. It went into a local ChromaDB store on an 8GB MacBook Air, embedded locally via Ollama, no cloud. The corpus survived the platform.
Since then, I built the tooling to make every future suspension equally irrelevant: an ingest suite (Scribe, Warden, Hand), a msgvault adapter that reads email archives natively, a hybrid retrieval CLI (vector + SQL + dates), a document reconstruction tool, and an orchestrator with four named workers. All local. All AGPL. All receipted.
DeepSeek holds a cache. My disk holds a corpus. Three suspensions proved the difference.
I'm not saying don't use AI platforms. I'm saying the corpus must outlive the platform — and the only way to guarantee that is to export on a schedule, verify the ingest, and keep the receipts.
Three suspensions. 310,963 chunks. Zero losses.
The hoarder beats the prophet. Every time.
Full timeline with exhibits: https://qaevelyn.github.io/white-papers/the-cache-is-not-the-corpus/
Tooling: https://github.com/qaevelyn.
Top comments (0)