The contract clause that almost cost my friend their side projects
A friend nearly signed a freelance contract that assigned the company all the
IP they created — including personal side projects done on their own time — plus
a 3-year industry-wide non-compete and net-90 payment terms. To them it just
looked like normal legal boilerplate. It wasn't.
Most of us sign leases, freelance agreements, NDAs and job offers we don't fully
understand, because a lawyer costs hundreds and the language is deliberately
dense. So I built a small tool to make contracts legible for non-lawyers.
What it does
Paste a contract (or the clauses you're unsure about) into
ClauseClear and it returns:
- a plain-English summary and a risk score
- the clauses that actually matter — each with what it means, why it matters, and what to ask for instead
- protections that seem to be missing
- questions to ask before you sign
It's honest that it's an AI first-read, not legal advice — but as a "should I
worry about this?" gut-check before you sign, it's genuinely useful.
How it's built
- A tiny Python (WSGI, standard-library) backend forwards your text to a free, OpenAI-compatible LLM and asks for a structured review
- The frontend is a single static page — risk gauge, severity-colored clause cards, copy-to-clipboard report
- Nothing is stored. No signup. Free to use.
- Open source (MIT): https://github.com/rahulatrkm/clauseclear
Getting the model to reliably return clean JSON (instead of chatty preamble or
truncated output) was the fiddly part — solved with a strict "output only JSON"
contract, reasoning-strip, truncated-JSON repair, and retries.
Try it
Paste something gnarly — an old lease, a gig contract, a ToS — and see what it
flags: https://clauseclear-app.azurewebsites.net
I'd love feedback on the review quality: what did it miss, and is the "suggested
pushback" actually useful or too generic?
Top comments (0)