DEV Community

Cover image for Load Balancer vs API Gateway (can one replace other)
Rahul Vijayvergiya
Rahul Vijayvergiya

Posted on • Originally published at rahulvijayvergiya.hashnode.dev

Load Balancer vs API Gateway (can one replace other)

This post was initially published on my blog. Check out the original source using the link below:

In modern architectures, Load Balancers and API Gateways are both critical components, but they solve different problems.

Because they sometimes appear in the same request path, they are often confused or even treated as interchangeable.

Load Balancer and OSI Layers

Load Balancer Type OSI Layer What It Understands
L4 Load Balancer Layer 4 (Transport) TCP/UDP, IP, Port
L7 Load Balancer Layer 7 (Application) HTTP/HTTPS, headers, paths

Key point:

A Load Balancer primarily focuses on traffic distribution, not API logic.

API Gateway and OSI Layers

Component OSI Layer
API Gateway Layer 7 (Application)

An API Gateway deeply understands HTTP semantics, such as:

  • Headers

  • JSON payloads

  • Authorization tokens

  • Request paths

  • API versions

4. Key Differences at a Glance

Aspect Load Balancer API Gateway
Primary Purpose Distribute traffic Manage APIs
OSI Layer L4 or L7 L7 only
Authentication ❌ (Very limited) ✅ Built-in
Rate Limiting
API Versioning
Request Transformation
Protocol Awareness TCP/HTTP HTTP/REST/GraphQL
Backend Awareness Servers Microservices & APIs

Because both can work at Layer 7 (Application Layer), a common question comes up:

“If both understand HTTP, why can’t one replace the other?”

What Is a Load Balancer?

A Load Balancer is like a traffic police officer 🚦.

Its main job:

👉 Decide which server should handle the request

Layer 4 = Transport Layer

It deals with:

  • IP address

  • Port number

  • TCP / UDP

  • Connections

At this layer, the load balancer does NOT understand HTTP, URLs, or headers.

Layer 7 = Application Layer

Even when working at Layer 7, a load balancer mainly does:

  • Distributes traffic across servers

  • Path-based routing (/api → server A)

  • Sticky sessions (same user → same server)

  • Health checks

  • SSL termination

NOTE: Sticky sessions only mean:

“Send this user to the same server again”

It does not mean: Checking identity, Validating tokens, Enforcing permissions

What Is an API Gateway?

An API Gateway is like a security guard at the building entrance 🛂.

Its main job:

👉 Control access to APIs

It handles: Authentication (JWT, OAuth, API keys), Authorization (what user can do), Rate limiting & throttling, API versioning (v1, v2), Request / response transformation, Logging and monitoring

API Gateway cares about:

Who is calling, how often, and what they are allowed to access

Why Load Balancer Cannot Handle Authentication

Even though a load balancer can read headers, authentication is more than reading headers.

Authentication involves: Token validation, Expiry checks, Role & permission checks, Sometimes DB or IAM calls

Load balancers are designed to be:

Fast, lightweight, and simple

If they start doing heavy security logic then Performance will drop, Scaling becomes harder

That’s why authentication belongs to API Gateway, not Load Balancer.

Can One Replace the Other?

Can API Gateway replace Load Balancer?

Sometimes, in small or serverless setups

Can Load Balancer replace API Gateway?

No, because it does not manage API security, limits, or versions

Final Summary

  • Load Balancer answers: “Where should this request go?”

  • API Gateway answers: “Who is calling and what can they do?”

Top comments (0)