Your father (parent class) gives you, the student/son (subclass A), a vaguely written textbook about addition and subtraction. Since your father was not able to give you a lesson on the topic, you are stuck on a problem that you do not know how to solve. You look to your right to see that your brother (subclass B) is also confused.

That is when you decide to ask your father for instructions. Unfortunately, for some reason, your father also does not know how to solve the problem.

That is why your father goes to ask your grandfather (parent of the parent class) about it. Finally, your grandfather understands the problem and tells your father how to solve it, who later tells you how to solve it yourself.

Your brother also goes to your father to ask him about the problem, which in turn leads to your father asking your grandfather about the problem again. After explaining, your father finally approaches your brother and answers his questions.


In a nutshell, this is prototypal inheritance, where the implementation of a certain property or method is delegated to a "parent/ancestor class" if the current object does not already have an implementation for said property or method.

 

Nicely said. You also scratch the surface of the issue with inheritance: it become complex to find "who knows what" (and decrease performance). That's why, most of the time, composition is preferred above inheritance.

When someone's born, all her ancestor gather to teach her everything they knows. This way, she don't need to rely on her father (and his father, and his father ...).

 

Despite its complexity, probably one of the biggest advantages you get from prototypal inheritance is the fact that all properties and methods in the prototype chain refer to the same instance of said property or method.

This makes prototypal inheritance quite space-efficient because it does not need to duplicate properties and methods for every instance of a class. The instantiated object simply has to refer, or rather point, to the corresponding property or method in the prototype chain it lacks implementation for.

We're getting off tracks here, but composition don't duplicate anything. Try this:

const canSpeak = {
    speak: msg => console.log(msg),
};
const me = Object.assign({}, canSpeak);
me.speak("Hello"); // => Hello
const you = Object.assign({}, canSpeak);
console.log(me.speak === you.speak); // => true

Oh, I just wanted to mention a "feature" that comes with prototypal inheritance for the sake of discussion since this post is about prototypal inheritance in the first place.

Also, I never actually thought of composition that way. I didn't know that the two objects would end up referencing the same speak method. That's pretty cool. Thanks for the heads up!

 

awesome explanation , much appreciated dood 👌

 

That's a great metaphor, love the way you put that!

Classic DEV Post from Aug 18 '18

What are/were your go to resources for learning Ruby and Rails?

Discussion on great resources to learn Ruby and Rails