In modern software development, project structure matters a lot. Whether you are a solo full-stack developer or working in a large team, choosing between Monorepo and Polyrepo can significantly impact your productivity and codebase management.
Today, let's dive into:
- What is Monorepo and Polyrepo?
- How Turborepo and pnpm workspaces help manage Monorepo?
- Why solo/fullstack developers should choose Monorepo?
- Why large teams often prefer Polyrepo?
π What is Monorepo?
A Monorepo is a single repository that stores the code for multiple apps or packages.
Example:
-
apps/client
(React frontend) -
apps/server
(Express backend) -
packages/*-config
(shared config. Example: typescript config, prettier config, eslint config)
β Advantages:
- Shared code easily
- Single place for versioning and dependency management
- Unified CI/CD pipeline
- Easy refactoring across apps
π’ What is Polyrepo?
A Polyrepo is multiple repositories, each responsible for a separate app or service.
Example:
frontend-repo
backend-repo
β Advantages:
- Clear separation of teams
- Independent release cycles
- Specific access control
βοΈ How Turborepo + pnpm Workspace Helps Monorepo
- Turborepo: Smart task running, build caching, and pipeline orchestration.
- pnpm Workspace: Handles dependencies between apps efficiently without duplication.
- With Turborepo, you can run and build only the parts of the project that changed.
- With pnpm Workspace, all dependencies are installed once, and shared efficiently.
Result: Fast, lightweight, developer-friendly Monorepo management.
π¨βπ» Which One Should You Choose?
-
Solo fullstack developer use
monorepo
-
Small team of fullstack developers use
monorepo
-
Separate frontend and backend teams use
polyrepo
-
Independent services use
polyrepo
π¬ Real Talk for Fullstack Developers:
If you are building a MERN Stack project (MongoDB, Express, React, Node.js) and you are working alone as like me or with a small fullstack team β use Monorepo.
Why?
- Faster local development.
- Easier dependency sharing (e.g., types, API schemas).
- Single PR for changes affecting frontend + backend.
"As a fullstack developer, Monorepo feels like home. Everything in one place. Easy to manage. Easy to scale."
π§± How to Structure MERN Monorepo (Quick Example)
my-monorepo/
β
βββ apps/
β βββ client/ # React app
β βββ server/ # Express API
β
βββ packages/
β βββ *-configs/ # all config packages
β
βββ turbo.json
βββ pnpm-workspace.yaml
βββ README.md
π§ Conclusion
Choosing between Monorepo and Polyrepo depends on your team structure and workflow.
π΅ Solo fullstack or small fullstack team β Monorepo (with Turborepo + pnpm).
π΄ Separate frontend/backend teams β Polyrepo.
Use the right structure and tools to maximize your efficiency π!
Top comments (0)