Agentic AI — From Workflows to Goal-Driven Systems
From rigid automation to systems that think in loops.
Automation vs Intelligence (A Quick Reset)
Most systems we build today are automated, not intelligent.
Even many “AI-powered” systems still follow this model:
Trigger
Rule
Action
Exit
They may use machine learning or LLMs at one step, but the control flow itself remains fixed.
Agentic AI changes the control model.
The Core Idea: The Agent Loop
At the heart of Agentic AI is a continuous decision loop:
goal → perceive → reason → act → observe → refine
This loop runs until the goal is achieved, abandoned, or the system is stopped.
Unlike workflows, the loop does not assume a predefined path.
A Real Example: Ecommerce Order Fulfillment
Let’s ground this in a real system most developers recognize.
The goal is simple:
Deliver the customer’s order on time at minimum cost.
That’s the only instruction.
No workflow.
No step-by-step logic.
Goal: Defining the Outcome
The agent starts with:
• A clear goal (deliver on time)
• Constraints (cost, SLA, inventory, location)
The goal stays the same even when the environment changes.
In traditional automation, workflows break.
In agentic systems, plans change — goals don’t.
Perceive: Understanding the Current State
The agent observes the environment:
• Inventory across warehouses
• Customer location
• Courier availability and SLAs
• Current time and delivery deadline
This is not a rule check.
It is situational awareness.
Reason: Selecting the Best Next Action
The agent asks:
“What action moves me closest to the goal right now?”
Possible decisions include:
• Choosing a nearer warehouse
• Splitting shipments
• Switching couriers due to SLA risk
• Upgrading shipping proactively
There is no fixed order.
Act: Executing Through Capabilities
The agent executes actions through tools:
• Inventory allocation APIs
• Courier booking systems
• Shipping label generation
• Customer notifications
These are capabilities, not scripted steps.
Observe: Closing the Feedback Loop
After acting, the agent evaluates:
• Shipment acceptance
• Delivery risk
• Inventory changes
Feedback keeps the system grounded in reality.
Refine: Adapting to Change
When conditions change — and they always do — the agent loops again.
A courier delay does not cause failure.
The agent re-evaluates, adjusts its plan, and continues toward the goal.
The goal never changes.
The plan does.
How This Differs from Traditional Automation
Traditional automation designs paths:
if A → do B
else → do C
Agentic AI designs decision systems:
goal + state → best next action
Automation is predictable.
Agentic systems are adaptive.
Where LLMs, RAG, and MCP Fit In
Agentic AI does not replace these components — it orchestrates them.
LLMs provide reasoning.
RAG provides grounding.
Tools enable action.
Memory or MCP maintains continuity.
None of these are agentic alone.
They become agentic when placed inside a goal-driven feedback loop.
The Developer Mindset Shift
You stop designing flows.
You start designing:
• Goals
• Constraints
• Capabilities
• Feedback
This shift reduces complexity where it matters most: control logic.
Why This Matters Now
Agentic systems are emerging because:
• Real-world environments are unpredictable
• Rules do not scale
• Adaptation is required
This is not hype.
It is a response to complexity.
Top comments (0)