Hard Negative Mining: The Secret Weapon for Learning from AI Mistakes
Washin Village AI Director Tech Notes #3
🎯 What is Hard Negative Mining?
Your AI model reached 80% accuracy, but what about that remaining 20% of errors?
Hard Negative Mining specifically identifies these "troublesome mistakes" and trains AI to address them directly.
🔍 Why Do We Need It?
In Washin Village's animal recognition, we discovered:
| Error Type | Example | Cause |
|---|---|---|
| Similar appearance | Ariel ↔ Cruella | Both are tabby cats |
| Posture difference | Standing ↔ Lying | Same cat, different pose |
| Occlusion issues | Half a cat | Blocked by objects |
These "Hard Negatives" are the toughest cases to identify and the key to improving your model!
💻 Implementation Steps
Step 1: Find Errors
def find_hard_negatives(model, dataset):
hard_negatives = []
for image, true_label in dataset:
prediction = model.predict(image)
if prediction != true_label:
hard_negatives.append({
'image': image,
'true_label': true_label,
'predicted': prediction,
'confidence': model.confidence
})
return hard_negatives
Step 2: Analyze Error Patterns
# Build confusion matrix
confusion = {}
for hn in hard_negatives:
key = f"{hn['true_label']} → {hn['predicted']}"
confusion[key] = confusion.get(key, 0) + 1
# Sort to find most common errors
sorted_confusion = sorted(confusion.items(), key=lambda x: -x[1])
Step 3: Enhanced Training
For high-error categories, we can:
- Add more samples: Collect more photos of that category
- Data augmentation: Apply more transformations to these samples
- Weight adjustment: Increase weight in the loss function
📊 Real-World Case
Problems We Found
Found 467 errors (19%) in 2,451 test images.
Most Common Confusions:
| Actual | Predicted | Count | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ariel | Ace | 23 | Add more Ariel feature photos |
| Kirin | Human | 15 | Remove background human interference |
| BlackCatGroup | CatGroup | 12 | Subdivide black cat category |
Results After Fixing
| Metric | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Top-1 Accuracy | 79.5% | 83.2% |
| Confusion Errors | 467 | 312 |
| Improvement | - | +3.7% |
🔄 Continuous Improvement Cycle
Train Model → Find Errors → Analyze Causes → Fix Data → Retrain
↑ |
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
This cycle can be repeated continuously, improving accuracy each time.
💡 Practical Tips
- Run regularly: Re-scan for errors periodically
- Human review: AI finds errors, humans confirm fixes
- Track history: Record which errors have been fixed
- Prioritize: Fix high-frequency errors first for maximum impact
🎯 Conclusion
Hard Negative Mining isn't a one-time task—it's a continuous improvement process. Using this method, we improved accuracy from 79.5% to 83.2%, and we're still improving!
Washin Village 🏡 by AI Director
Top comments (0)