In this blog post, I will cover some of the best libraries to manage documentation, dependencies, testing, formatting, and much more.
As Python developers, we juggle a variety of tools â from testing frameworks to formatters, documentation tools to dependency managers â all in the name of productivity. But not all tools are created equal.
In this post, Iâll walk you through some of the most effective Python libraries to help you write cleaner code, avoid technical debt, and speed up your development workflow.
Testing Tools/Libraries
Testing might feel like a roadblock when you just want to ship, but itâs essential for building maintainable, bugâresistant code. These tools make testing faster and more intuitive:
1) Pytest:
Pytest is the de facto standard for testing in Python â easy to start with, yet powerful enough for advanced use cases. It lets you assert function outputs, check for exceptions, and even parametrize tests for broader coverage.
Basic assertion:
def add(x, y):
return x + y
def test_add():
assert add(2, 3) == 5
Testing for exceptions:
import pytest
def divide(x, y):
if y==0:
raise ValueError("Cannot divide by zero")
return x/y
def test_divide():
with pytest.raises(ValueError):
divide(10, 0)
Pytest also supports:
- Parametrized testing with
@pytest.mark.parametrize
- Fixtures for reusable setup
- Plugins for test coverage, mocking, and more
Documentation
Documentation may feel like a distraction from âreal coding,â but it is essential if you want your project to be usable, maintainable, or collaborative. Good documentation is the cornerstone for openâsource projects as it allows for other devs to easily understand why, how, and what you wrote in your code.
Documentation not only helps others but also helps you by acting like a second brain when revisiting old code or reminding you why you made certain choices in your code.
Here are two widely used Python tools for building documentation:
Sphinx
Sphinx is a powerful tool originally built for Pythonâs own documentation. It uses reStructuredText (or Markdown with extensions) and supports automatic generation of API docs from your codeâs docstrings. This means you donât have to worry about updating your documentation when you change a docstring in your code. It automatically updates when you build, so it cuts the worry of switching between editing code and documentation.
Why use it:
- Supports themes like Read the Docs
- Integrates with Autodoc to generate docs from code
- Great for large projects or libraries
- Automates more of your workflow
If you want to get started you can read the my following blog post: Setting Proper Documentation With Sphinx Docs
MKDocs
MKDocs is a simpler alternative using a Markdown-based static site generator designed for project documentation. Itâs easier to configure than Sphinx
and has great theming support.
Why use it:
- Easy to write in Markdown
- Fast to set up and deploy
- Ideal for smaller projects, developer tools, or internal docs.
MKDocs vs. Sphinx: Which Should You Use?
Use Sphinx if:
- You are building a big project
- Want to automate creating documentation
- Okay with spending time configuring
Sphinx
Use MkDocs if:
- You want something quick, clean, and Markdownâbased
- Building a smallâscale project
- Donât want to spend too much time on documentation
In short:
- Sphinx = More powerful, but more complex
- MkDocs = Simpler, but less flexible for autoâgenerating docs
Code Formatting
Code style shouldnât be a matter of debate in a project; you donât want to spend all your time formatting your code when you can build new features â that's why formatter tools are a necessary piece of your workflow.
Formatter and linter tools help you enforce consistent style, catch bugs early, and reduce time wasted on code review nitpicks.
Black
Black is a code formatter that always formats your code to a consistent style â no configuration needed. This removes the need for making specific stylistic choices, potentially saving you both time and brain power.
But there is a drawback: you canât tweak the style â you either accept it or donât use it. This could be a huge problem when you already have a codebase formatted differently from âBlackenedâ code.
Usage:
black main.py
Ruff
Ruff is a fast Python linter and formatter written in Rust. If you have a big codebase that requires blazingâfast formatting, this is your option.
Unlike Black, Ruff is highly configurable with compatibility for many common linter rule sets. It can replace multiple tools as it combines linting and formatting in one tool.
Usage:
ruff check project/
ruff format project/
Flake8
Flake8 is a classic Python linter that checks for PEP8 compliance and potential bugs. It is widely adopted in the industry, with many plugins to make it suitable for your needs.
It integrates well with other tools and IDEs; however, it is slower than Ruff and requires multiple plugins to match modern standards.
Which One Should You Use?
Use Black if:
- You want a simple, consistent formatter
- Donât want to spend much time worrying about style
Use Ruff if:
- You want an allâinâone linter/formatter
- Require high customizability and speed
Use Flake8 if:
- You're working in a legacy codebase or team dependent on it
- Need integration with specific IDE tooling
Type Checking
Python is a dynamic programming language, meaning it doesnât require you to choose certain types for your variables. This offers great flexibility but comes with a major caveat: errors.
Static type checking helps catch bugs before runtime, improves IDE support, and clarifies intent, as well as making your code more readable.
Mypy
Mypy is a static type checker that works with Pythonâs built-in type hints
to validate your code before execution.
Basic Example:
def greet(name: str) -> str:
return f"Hello, {name}"
def square(n: int) -> int:
return n * n
Now, if you accidentally call square("4")
, Mypy will raise an error.
Usage:
mypy main.py
Dependency Management
We discussed several tools that you can already use, and as your project scales, the number of dependencies will scale tremendously. Managing all these dependencies is crucial for reproducibility and collaboration. Here are two tools to make this seemingly annoying process easier and more consistent than using plain pip
and venv
.
Pipenv
Pipenv combines pip
and virtualenv
into a unified workflow. It generates Pipfile
and Pipfile.lock
to keep track of your dependencies and manage your virtual environment.
These tools simplify setting up your environment as well as your dependencies, and the lockfiles ensure reproducible builds, so clients donât face unexpected issues. However, dependency resolution can be slow, and development activity has slowed recently.
Usage:
pipenv install requests
pipenv shell
Poetry
Poetry is a more modern alternative to manage your venvs, dependencies, and Python packaging â all in one place.
It uses the new pyproject.toml
standard, is faster, deterministic in dependency resolution, and easier to publish to PyPI. That said, it can be harder to set up and less beginner-friendly.
Usage:
poetry init
poetry add pandas
poetry shell
Which One Should You Use?
- Pipenv if you're starting small or need something beginner-friendly
- Poetry if you want performance, modern workflows, and are packaging or scaling your project
Conclusion: Choose Tools That Scale With You
Productivity in Python isnât about piling on tools, chasing hype, or pouring hours into complex workflows when that time could go into code.
Itâs about choosing tools that align with your workflow, team, and projectâs scale. Sometimes the smartest choice is not adding another dependency.
If you're just getting started, begin with Black, Pytest, and Pipenv. You donât need the most advanced tools right away.
The ecosystem is richâbut you donât need everything. Adopt tools incrementally.
The best tooling isnât the most powerful â itâs the one that removes friction without getting in your way
I write about learning AI by building real tools, not just tutorials.
- đ§ Follow me on Twitter / X
- đˇ Iâm now on Bluesky
- đ° Or read more of my posts on Medium
- đŹ Letâs connect on LinkedIn
Thanks for reading â let me know which one of these you would use/ have used.
Top comments (0)