DEV Community

Suleyman Sade
Suleyman Sade

Posted on • Originally published at Medium

🐍 Top Python Libraries to Supercharge Your Productivity

Cover Image: a snake moving around gears, files, and a box filled with these

In this blog post, I will cover some of the best libraries to manage documentation, dependencies, testing, formatting, and much more.

As Python developers, we juggle a variety of tools — from testing frameworks to formatters, documentation tools to dependency managers — all in the name of productivity. But not all tools are created equal.

In this post, I’ll walk you through some of the most effective Python libraries to help you write cleaner code, avoid technical debt, and speed up your development workflow.

Testing Tools/Libraries

Testing might feel like a roadblock when you just want to ship, but it’s essential for building maintainable, bug‑resistant code. These tools make testing faster and more intuitive:

1) Pytest:

Pytest is the de facto standard for testing in Python — easy to start with, yet powerful enough for advanced use cases. It lets you assert function outputs, check for exceptions, and even parametrize tests for broader coverage.

Basic assertion:

def add(x, y):
    return x + y

def test_add():
    assert add(2, 3) == 5
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Testing for exceptions:

import pytest

def divide(x, y):
  if y==0:
    raise ValueError("Cannot divide by zero")
  return x/y

def test_divide():
  with pytest.raises(ValueError):
    divide(10, 0)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Pytest also supports:

  • Parametrized testing with @pytest.mark.parametrize
  • Fixtures for reusable setup
  • Plugins for test coverage, mocking, and more

Documentation

Documentation may feel like a distraction from “real coding,” but it is essential if you want your project to be usable, maintainable, or collaborative. Good documentation is the cornerstone for open‑source projects as it allows for other devs to easily understand why, how, and what you wrote in your code.

Documentation not only helps others but also helps you by acting like a second brain when revisiting old code or reminding you why you made certain choices in your code.

Here are two widely used Python tools for building documentation:

Sphinx

Sphinx is a powerful tool originally built for Python’s own documentation. It uses reStructuredText (or Markdown with extensions) and supports automatic generation of API docs from your code’s docstrings. This means you don’t have to worry about updating your documentation when you change a docstring in your code. It automatically updates when you build, so it cuts the worry of switching between editing code and documentation.

Why use it:

  • Supports themes like Read the Docs
  • Integrates with Autodoc to generate docs from code
  • Great for large projects or libraries
  • Automates more of your workflow

If you want to get started you can read the my following blog post: Setting Proper Documentation With Sphinx Docs

MKDocs

MKDocs is a simpler alternative using a Markdown-based static site generator designed for project documentation. It’s easier to configure than Sphinx and has great theming support.

Why use it:

  • Easy to write in Markdown
  • Fast to set up and deploy
  • Ideal for smaller projects, developer tools, or internal docs.

MKDocs vs. Sphinx: Which Should You Use?

Use Sphinx if:

  • You are building a big project
  • Want to automate creating documentation
  • Okay with spending time configuring Sphinx

Use MkDocs if:

  • You want something quick, clean, and Markdown‑based
  • Building a small‑scale project
  • Don’t want to spend too much time on documentation

In short:

  • Sphinx = More powerful, but more complex
  • MkDocs = Simpler, but less flexible for auto‑generating docs

Code Formatting

Code style shouldn’t be a matter of debate in a project; you don’t want to spend all your time formatting your code when you can build new features — that's why formatter tools are a necessary piece of your workflow.

Formatter and linter tools help you enforce consistent style, catch bugs early, and reduce time wasted on code review nitpicks.

Black

Black is a code formatter that always formats your code to a consistent style — no configuration needed. This removes the need for making specific stylistic choices, potentially saving you both time and brain power.

But there is a drawback: you can’t tweak the style — you either accept it or don’t use it. This could be a huge problem when you already have a codebase formatted differently from “Blackened” code.

Usage:

black main.py
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Ruff

Ruff is a fast Python linter and formatter written in Rust. If you have a big codebase that requires blazing‑fast formatting, this is your option.

Unlike Black, Ruff is highly configurable with compatibility for many common linter rule sets. It can replace multiple tools as it combines linting and formatting in one tool.

Usage:

ruff check project/
ruff format project/
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Flake8

Flake8 is a classic Python linter that checks for PEP8 compliance and potential bugs. It is widely adopted in the industry, with many plugins to make it suitable for your needs.

It integrates well with other tools and IDEs; however, it is slower than Ruff and requires multiple plugins to match modern standards.

Which One Should You Use?

Use Black if:

  • You want a simple, consistent formatter
  • Don’t want to spend much time worrying about style

Use Ruff if:

  • You want an all‑in‑one linter/formatter
  • Require high customizability and speed

Use Flake8 if:

  • You're working in a legacy codebase or team dependent on it
  • Need integration with specific IDE tooling

Type Checking

Python is a dynamic programming language, meaning it doesn’t require you to choose certain types for your variables. This offers great flexibility but comes with a major caveat: errors.

Static type checking helps catch bugs before runtime, improves IDE support, and clarifies intent, as well as making your code more readable.

Mypy

Mypy is a static type checker that works with Python’s built-in type hints to validate your code before execution.

Basic Example:

def greet(name: str) -> str:
    return f"Hello, {name}"

def square(n: int) -> int:
    return n * n
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Now, if you accidentally call square("4"), Mypy will raise an error.

Usage:

mypy main.py
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Dependency Management

We discussed several tools that you can already use, and as your project scales, the number of dependencies will scale tremendously. Managing all these dependencies is crucial for reproducibility and collaboration. Here are two tools to make this seemingly annoying process easier and more consistent than using plain pip and venv.

Pipenv

Pipenv combines pip and virtualenv into a unified workflow. It generates Pipfile and Pipfile.lock to keep track of your dependencies and manage your virtual environment.

These tools simplify setting up your environment as well as your dependencies, and the lockfiles ensure reproducible builds, so clients don’t face unexpected issues. However, dependency resolution can be slow, and development activity has slowed recently.

Usage:

pipenv install requests
pipenv shell
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Poetry

Poetry is a more modern alternative to manage your venvs, dependencies, and Python packaging — all in one place.

It uses the new pyproject.toml standard, is faster, deterministic in dependency resolution, and easier to publish to PyPI. That said, it can be harder to set up and less beginner-friendly.

Usage:

poetry init
poetry add pandas
poetry shell
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Which One Should You Use?

  • Pipenv if you're starting small or need something beginner-friendly
  • Poetry if you want performance, modern workflows, and are packaging or scaling your project

Conclusion: Choose Tools That Scale With You

Productivity in Python isn’t about piling on tools, chasing hype, or pouring hours into complex workflows when that time could go into code.

It’s about choosing tools that align with your workflow, team, and project’s scale. Sometimes the smartest choice is not adding another dependency.

If you're just getting started, begin with Black, Pytest, and Pipenv. You don’t need the most advanced tools right away.

The ecosystem is rich—but you don’t need everything. Adopt tools incrementally.

The best tooling isn’t the most powerful — it’s the one that removes friction without getting in your way


I write about learning AI by building real tools, not just tutorials.

  • 🧠 Follow me on Twitter / X
  • 🔷 I’m now on Bluesky
  • 📰 Or read more of my posts on Medium
  • 💬 Let’s connect on LinkedIn

Thanks for reading — let me know which one of these you would use/ have used.

Top comments (0)