DEV Community

Sven Hettwer
Sven Hettwer

Posted on • Updated on

Arch Linux for Devs

This report is about the experience I've made with Arch Linux as the operating system for a developers workstation. You'll be introduced into the concepts of Arch Linux, followed by a introduction into the main tasks such as package installation and OS maintenance. At the end, I'll discuss why I think that Arch Linux is a great OS for developers, and finish with a conclusion.


First of all, I'd like to avoid the typical OS comparison statements like "Linux is better than Windows", "Mac is better than Linux" or "Windows is better than Mac". If the operating system suites your personal requirements, it is the right choice for you. There is, as in so many aspects in life, no absolute "better" choice.

Please note that this article is nevertheless based on my personal opinion and may vary from your or others opinions.

What is Arch Linux?

Arch Linux is a extremely lightweight, fully customizable, rolling release Linux distribution which is driven by its community and has been written from scratch. It follows the KISS principle which results in the fact that there is no overhead in the operating system such as a graphical or a commandline installation dialog nor is a configuration tool provided by the distribution itself available. Therefore Arch Linux is targeted on the more experienced Linux user. The simplicity of Arch Linux allows you to build your system exactly as you need it without a reinstall to obtain a new major OS version ever, due to the rolling release attempt. That gives you the opportunity to run your first Arch Linux installation theoretically forever, if you maintain it well.
Different to other distributions, Arch Linux does not ship with a default desktop installation, a default file system or a default tool set. It is just an operating system. Nothing more and nothing less. That's simplicity, isn't it?

There are various guides in the official wiki that help you to setup your system as desired. There are also projects providing distributions based on Arch. One of them is Anarchy Linux, which I'm personally using. It's basically a Arch Linux with an installation dialog. It's still possible to customize your installation by aborting the installer and do things manually or to uncheck some packages you don't want to be installed.

Package management

The package manager of Arch Linux is called pacman. It's a CLI tool allowing you to install, remove and update the packages on your system. May the packages be self build, downloaded from the official repositories or from the AUR (Arch User Repository), where users are able to provide self maintained packages, pacman is your tool to manage them. Let's have a look at the most important commands:

  • pacman -Syu: Update all packages after synchronizing the package repository database
  • pacman -S <package-name> Install a package
  • pacman -R <package-name> Remove a package
  • pacman -Qdt Query the package database and find all packages that are not longer required.

The only slightly uncomfortable task is to install a package from the AUR. These packages have to be build, before you're able to install them. This requires the following steps:

  • Download the sources
  • cd /path/to/the/sources
  • Check all files carefully, because AUR repos could potentially contain anything.
  • makepkg -si

Another uncomfortable task is to keep your AUR packages up to date, because pacman is not able to do that. So you would have to check the versions of your AUR packages on a regular basis and reinstall them if required.
But don't be scared! AUR helper tools to the rescue! These tools are capable of managing the official repositories as well as the AUR. I've recently chosen aurman as my AUR helper, because it is well maintained, well documented, contains a lot of functionality and simply works well. It is also relatively new as its AUR entry has been created at 2018-03-20 22:31. Have a look at the aurman AUR page for more details.
To install aurman on a fresh Arch Linux, just install it manually from the AUR as mentioned earlier. If you're interested in some more details, just visit the Arch User Respository wiki entry.

Because aurman has a native pacman integration, you can just use it as you would use pacman but with AUR support.

Quick edit on 2018-12-28:
Polygamma has stopped aurman development:
I am not willing to continue developing aurman for public use. The GitHub issues are closed, I am not interested in feedback, feature requests or bug reports anymore. aurman is going to be developed for myself only from now on, I suggest migrating to yay. source
For more information, please have a look at the README on github.

I migrated to yay and it works great. Thx to @maxdevjs for pointing out that this blog still recommends aurman. Happy new year everybody!

Available packages

One of my biggest concerns has been, that I could be unable to find all the software packages that I need for my daily work or that the packages may be outdated, because Arch Linux is using its own packaging system. As of today, all packages I require where available via the official repositories or the AUR. This also includes software as the IntelliJ Ultimate IDEA. Contradicting to what I once thought, the Arch Linux packages are absolutely up to date, if not bleeding edge.

Maintaining your system

Software updates

As for many other operating systems the most usual maintenance process is installing updates. As mentioned earlier, this can be done easily with one command pacman -Syu or aurman -Syu in case that you've chosen aurman. If you install your updates once a week, it wont take long. Currently my updates take ~10 minutes. This excludes the updates where I have to update IntelliJ IDEA. This takes 5-10 min. extra.
Before you start an update, I highly recommend to check for any known issues. As mentioned, Arch Linux is a bleeding edge rolling release distribution. So it might be that some updates require your attention more than others. As of today, I've had only one update that required manual interaction. The instructions to solve this issue (js52 update) have been well documented on

Backups and Restore

Having backups of your files is one of the most important rules when you work with computers. I think nearly everybody has had a situation where data was lost because of insufficient backup. So, I assume that this lesson has been learned and therefore I'll skip that chapter. The more interesting part, that I want to talk about is creating a backup of your operating system so that you're able to restore your system in case of a dramatic system failure. As always, you've many possibilities to achieve that. Let's discuss some scenarios and possible solutions.

Unstable system

Let's pretend, you've updated your system. Now your system is throwing error messages around and is slower as it should be. Identifying the root cause can easily become a tedious task if the update was not only performed for one package but for 10 or 20. So, it would be great to roll back your system, right? No Problem! If you've chosen BTRFS as your file system, you're able to create snapshots of your entire filesystem. These snapshots can be restored If you've booted into a restore medium or a rescue partition. Please note that a btrfs snapshot is technically **not* a backup. It is just a copy on write shadow of your original device.*
Well, to be fair, BTRFS is not Arch Linux exclusive. But it leverages the rolling release concept as any other software package does. Therefore you'll most likely receive bug fixes and improvements earlier than with other distributions.

Fatal system crash

Worst case scenario! HDD/SSD damage. Because you've created backups of your files, it's not that bad, right? You just have to setup your system again, restore your files from backup and everything is fine. Nevertheless, installing all of your required packages and setting up your individual configurations may consume some time. Therefore I recommend to backup these information as well, because what is an operating system more than a bunch of packages and configuration, right? Here are the tools I use:

  • etckeeper: Creates a git repository for your /etc folder including fully automated commits after every pacman operation due to lifecycle hooks.
  • packup: A simple tool to export the list of installed packages. It also provides a installation functionality, but I would go with aurman here as well.
  • dotfiles: A tool to keep track of your dotfiles across multiple systems.

So a recovery of a system using these tools is really simple: Install Arch Linux, install all packages from your exported package list, restore your config, restore your dotfiles, done!

More information

As mentioned earlier, there are tons of information in the official wiki. This also includes a article about system maintainance. Here you'll find a lot of tools and tasks to keep your system healthy and stable. Please note that not all of the mentioned tasks are required to keep your system stable. Just pick what you think is important to you.

Why I think Arch Linux is great for developers

Many of the mentioned aspects in this article are achievable with other distributions as well, but there are some points that make Arch Linux the ideal choice for developers from my point of view.
As developers, we know about software and technology. We know how software works, we know how these technical things come together, we know how to treat software systems. And if we don't know, we're able to learn quickly, because software is our daily business and passion. These aspects in combination with the simplicity and flexibility of Arch Linux is a great combination with a lot of potential to make your day to day work as efficient as possible.

As a rolling release distribution, you've always an up to date system without fearing the end of a LTS period. The software packages are also up to date if not bleeding edge. That means, you don't have to wait until a maintainer decides that a new package version is stable and good to go. You're in charge to maintain your system and customize it as you desire while the maintainance effort is similar to other distributions. You decide, if you want a fully fledged modern desktop environment with all the nice looking effects, or if you want a minimal or CLI driven system unleashing the full computation power of your machine. And if things break? Well, then you know where to search for the issue, because you've setup your system and therefore you know whats running on it.
All this in combination with the active Arch Linux community and the detailed documentation in the official wiki makes it a great choice for developers in my opinion.


As mentioned in the beginning:
If the operating system suites your personal requirements, it is the right choice for you.
In my case, this is Arch Linux. Not because it brings a new stunning feature or a life changing enhancement to the world of Linux but it brings some different concepts that make sense and improve the way the system works and feels from a users perspective.

I want my system to be as efficient as possible without missing the comfort of a desktop environment. I also want to be able to work with up to date software. I want my system to be stable and reliable and I want to understand what's going on on it. All of this and nothing can be found with Arch Linux.
With Arch Linux you have a simple, fully customizable, community driven rolling release operating system with a massive ecosystem of software packages and documentation. You’ve everything available that is available in other distributions, but with Arch Linux, you’ve the choice to use it or not. Nevertheless Arch Linux is not for beginners. You should have a solid understanding of Linux systems, before you start. But if you gained that knowledge, you'll be able to use its full potential.

This article is originally published at at 2018-06-18

Top comments (24)

andreanidouglas profile image
Douglas R Andreani

By the way, have I already mentioned that I use Arch?

piotroxp profile image
Piotr Słupski

Great read.

As I have mentioned, I use

How to change the background color in markdown?

svettwer profile image
Sven Hettwer • Edited

I'm glad you liked it.

With markdown, you're unable to manipulate images directly. But there are multiple logos available under

Please have a look at the trademark policy before use.

What you could do is adding some html and css to your markdown page. At least this is possible if you're using jekyll or Hugo AFAIK. But I don't know how you would achieve this on


jonathasrr profile image
Jon Ribeiro

My case: Arch Linux at home since 2007, where I was able to spend time configuring it as I wanted and Manjaro (Arch Linux based, for those of you who don't know) at work, as I chose not to spend time with configuration.

nishithsavla profile image
Nishith Savla

Have a look at Garuda Linux. This has awesome aesthetics, power of Arch as it is based on Arch, and has the Calamares installer so you can set it up in minutes.

manueltorrez profile image
Manuel Torrez

I like Arch but I don't like spending too much time setting up the OS, so Manjaro is for me

nishithsavla profile image
Nishith Savla

Have a look at Garuda Linux. This has awesome aesthetics, power of Arch as it is based on Arch, and has the Calamares installer so you can set it up in minutes.

maxdevjs profile image
maxdevjs • Edited

I'd suggest to check aurman AUR page (before to adopt it):

"polygamma commented on 2018-08-21 18:02
aurman development for public use has been stopped. i suggest migrating to yay, i am not interested in any kind of feedback, bug reports, feature requests etc. anymore."

svettwer profile image
Sven Hettwer

Yeah, as I wrote the blog, aurman was still under development. I've switched to yay as well but did not change the post.


svettwer profile image
Sven Hettwer

I've altered the post. Thx for pointing that out @maxdevjs !

thorstenhirsch profile image
Thorsten Hirsch

Arch's package management is great! It's the easiest for packaging your own software, much easier than DEB and RPM. And that's why so many users contribute to AUR, I guess.

So if you want a clean setup on your computer with each and every software under control of the system's package manager, yes, I think Arch is the best OS for that (and probably also distributions that are derived from Arch).

goldpeace99 profile image

I totally agree with this. Because I am using Arch and I think it is the best OS for me. Maybe some people don't like it.

vasilvestre profile image
Valentin Silvestre

Well I'm having an XPS and Ubuntu is fully compatibly so I use Ubuntu.
It work really great and I got no problem.. Arch is way harder to use, install and manage.

nishithsavla profile image
Nishith Savla

Have a look at Garuda Linux. It has awesome aesthetics, power of Arch as it is based on Arch, and has the Calamares installer so you can set it up in minutes. Also, it has some GUI stuff for many settings which you need to do using the terminal in other distros.

cess11 profile image

Been in Ubuntu daily for months and nothing have made me miss Arch this much before.

abdielsudiro profile image
Inline Assembly

Since I use Blackarch (Arch-based) 3 years ago on my laptop, I decide to install my PC at the office with Arch. It's great OS for my daily needs along with SLES and FreeBSD.

Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.