Instead of:
💬 "We need to refactor this technical debt."
Try this:
💡 "This takes 3 extra days now but saves 2 days on every future feature. We break even after the second feature."
🧮 The Magic Formula:
Initial Investment ÷ Time Saved per Cycle = Break-even Point
For example:
"This refactor takes 3 extra days now, but it saves 2 days on every future feature. That means we break even after feature two—and save time from then on."*
🤝 Why It Works:
Product managers think in timelines and ROI, not architecture. Give them numbers they can actually use to make business decisions.
💬 Try This:
In your next planning meeting, translate one technical decision into time/cost terms instead of just calling it “debt.”
It shifts the conversation from “please trust us” to “here’s the business case.”
👉 What's your go-to phrase for explaining tech tradeoffs to non-devs?
Top comments (0)