DEV Community

Cover image for TypeScript PDF Libraries (Free & Paid Tools Comparison) for Developers
Tayyab Ali
Tayyab Ali

Posted on

TypeScript PDF Libraries (Free & Paid Tools Comparison) for Developers

TypeScript has become the standard for building reliable JavaScript applications, and generating PDF files is a common requirement in modern web development. You might need to create invoices for e-commerce platforms, generate reports for analytics dashboards, or build document management systems with form-filling capabilities. However, working with PDFs in TypeScript comes with specific challenges. The PDF specification is complex, library options vary widely in features, and licensing costs can range from free to thousands of dollars annually. To address these challenges, developers have several solid options available.

Some TypeScript PDF libraries are entirely free, open-source, and offer native TypeScript support. Others offer commercial licenses with enterprise features, dedicated support, and advanced capabilities like real-time collaboration and digital signatures. Some libraries work only in browsers, while others support both Node.js and browser environments. You'll need to choose based on your budget, feature requirements, and deployment environment.

In this article, we'll explore four popular TypeScript PDF libraries, covering both free and paid options. Each has its strengths and limitations. By the end, you'll have a clear understanding of which library best fits your project needs.

1. pdf-lib: TypeScript PDF Generation library

pdf-lib is a TypeScript-first PDF library designed for both creating and modifying PDF documents in any JavaScript environment. Written entirely in TypeScript and compiled to pure JavaScript, it stands out as one of the few open source libraries that handle both PDF creation and manipulation without relying on native dependencies. This library excels at tasks like form filling, PDF merging, document splitting, and adding text or images to existing PDFs. Its imperative API gives developers precise control over PDF operations, though this comes at the cost of manual layout calculations for complex documents.

Pros of pdf-lib

  • Native TypeScript support with built-in type definitions

  • Universal JavaScript runtime compatibility across browsers, Node.js, Deno, and React Native

  • Powerful PDF modification capabilities for editing existing documents from a blank page

  • Tree-shakable modules with a clean API and zero external dependencies

  • Strong form handling support for creating and filling various field types

  • Supports Uint8Array and ArrayBuffer for flexible font data management

Cons of pdf-lib

  • Manual layout calculations required for complex documents

  • Limited support for complex form features like conditional logic or live validation

  • No built-in rendering capabilities for viewing PDFs

  • No HTML or CSS support for content generation

  • Some API methods feel outdated compared to modern JavaScript practices

2. jsPDF

jsPDF is a pioneering client-side JavaScript library for generating PDF documents entirely in the browser. First released around 2010, it became one of the earliest solutions for creating PDFs without server-side processing. jsPDF provides TypeScript support through built-in type definitions. It assists TypeScript developers who need quick, lightweight PDF generation.

This library primarily works on the client side, though it also supports Node.js environments via dedicated build files. jsPDF excels at creating simple PDFs with text, images, shapes, and vector graphics. Its straightforward API allows developers to generate documents with minimal code. This library supports custom fonts through TTF files and offers various plugins for extended functionality, including table generation and HTML-to-PDF conversion.

Pros of jsPDF

  • Built-in TypeScript type definitions with no separate @types package required

  • Lightweight and fast for simple PDF generation tasks

  • Pure client-side operation eliminates server-side processing requirements

  • Works in both browser and Node.js environments with automatic version detection

  • Large community with over 30,400 GitHub stars and extensive third-party plugins

  • Supports custom TTF fonts for multi-language documents beyond the Latin alphabet

  • MIT license allows unrestricted commercial use without restrictions

Cons of jsPDF

  • Struggles with complex layouts requiring manual positioning and calculations

  • Limited support for CSS or HTML styles without additional plugins like html2canvas

  • No built-in PDF rendering or viewing capabilities

  • Cannot edit or manipulate existing PDF documents, only create new ones

  • Lacks advanced features like digital signatures, form manipulation, or PDF/A conversion

  • HTML-to-PDF conversion requires external dependencies and produces suboptimal results

  • Standard fonts are restricted to the ASCII codepage, requiring custom font embedding for UTF-8

  • Resource-intensive for complex documents can impact browser performance and memory

3. pdfme: Generating PDFs in TypeScript

pdfme is an open-source PDF generation library built entirely in TypeScript with a React-based UI template editor. Created to simplify PDF design and generation, it takes a declarative, template-based approach that eliminates manual layout calculations.

This library is completely free under the MIT license and works in both browser and Node.js environments. pdfme provides separate packages for generation, UI components, and schemas, with built-in support for text, images, barcodes, and custom plugins.

Pros of pdfme

  • Written entirely in TypeScript with full native type support

  • WYSIWYG template designer with a drag-and-drop interface similar to Google Slides

  • Works in both browser and Node.js environments with no native dependencies

  • Built-in plugin system for images, barcodes, QR codes, and custom schemas

  • Active development with regular updates and community support

Cons of pdfme

  • Steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with template-based approaches

  • Limited functionality compared to full-featured PDF viewers with annotations

  • Lacks advanced features like digital signatures or PDF/A conversion

  • Template-centric workflow may not suit all use cases requiring low-level control

  • Requires Node.js version 16 or higher

  • Less comprehensive than commercial solutions for enterprise requirements

4. Nutrient Web SDK: Handle Multiple PDFs Easily

Nutrient Web SDK brings professional PDF capabilities to TypeScript applications. This commercial JavaScript library handles viewing, annotating, editing, and signing documents directly in the browser. It works with PDFs without requiring a server.

The SDK integrates with any TypeScript project via npm. You get type definitions for TypeScript out of the box. Developers can deploy it in three ways: entirely client-side using WebAssembly, paired with Document Engine for server-side processing, or through the cloud-hosted DWS Viewer API.

Pros of Nutrient Web SDK

  • Full TypeScript support with native type definitions included in the package

  • Works entirely client-side with no server required for basic operations

  • Includes 30+ features like annotations, digital signatures, form filling, and text editing

  • Built on the PDFium rendering engine for reliable, high-fidelity document display

  • Professional support with direct access to engineering teams

  • Detailed documentation with code samples and integration guides

  • Three deployment options (client-side, server-backed, or cloud-hosted)

  • Can process documents offline once loaded in the browser

  • Customizable UI that can match your application's design

Cons of Nutrient Web SDK

  • Commercial license required after trial period, with no free tier

  • Pricing is not publicly disclosed and varies by project requirements

  • A complex pricing structure requires upfront analysis to avoid surprise costs

  • Requires strong technical knowledge to optimize distribution and performance

  • License keys are tied to specific domains listed in your subscription

  • Heavy initial download for the WebAssembly core and assets

  • No monthly subscription option for short-term projects

Choosing Your Library

Your choice depends on your specific needs. Creating PDFs from scratch? Look at pdf-lib or jsPDF. Need a template-based approach with a visual editor? Consider pdfme. Want advanced features like annotations and digital signatures? Nutrient Web SDK delivers those capabilities.

Budget plays a significant role. Open-source libraries cost nothing upfront but require more development time. You'll build features yourself and troubleshoot issues independently. Commercial solutions include support and pre-built features, but you'll pay licensing fees that can reach thousands annually.

Look at each project's GitHub activity. Active repositories with recent commits and engaged contributors usually resolve bugs faster. Check the issue tracker to see how maintainers respond to problems.

Test thoroughly before deploying. PDF generation errors frustrate users and create support tickets. Validate file inputs, handle edge cases, and test across different browsers. Run stress tests with various document sizes and complexity levels. Your testing effort now prevents user complaints later.

Top comments (0)