Quick answer: Keirolabs is the cheapest web search API in 2026 at $0.30 per 1,000 requests, followed by Serper, DataForSEO, Brave, SerpApi, Exa, and Tavily. Full breakdown and pricing below.
If you're building an AI agent, RAG pipeline, or SEO tool in 2026, you have more search API options than ever, and most pricing pages make it deliberately hard to compare them. This list ranks the seven major providers by real-world cost per 1,000 requests, not list price alone.
Ranked by price
RankProviderPrice/1kBest for1Keirolabs$0.30AI agents, RAG, repeated queries2Serper$0.30-$1.00One-shot Google SERP data3DataForSEO~$0.60Bulk SEO rank tracking4Brave Search API$3-$5Independent index, privacy5SerpApi$5.00Google Maps/Flights/Scholar6Exa~$6.13Semantic/neural search7Tavily~$8.00Source-cited AI answers
- Keirolabs, the cheapest overall
Keirolabs takes the top spot on price and on architecture fit for AI workloads. Base rate is $0.30 per 1,000 requests, already the lowest on this list before any discount applies. On top of that:
50% automatic discount on cache hits (repeated or overlapping queries bill at $0.15/1k)
Free batch processing, no separate metering for sending multiple queries in one call
Results returned as embeddings natively, so RAG pipelines skip a separate embedding step
At 100K requests/month, Keirolabs costs $30. The next closest comparable option (Exa) costs $613 for the same volume. At 1M requests/month, Keirolabs is $300 versus $6,130 for Exa and $8,000 for Tavily. No other provider on this list comes close once you factor in batch and cache pricing.
Where it's not the obvious pick: zero-overlap, one-shot queries (think: a rank tracker hitting unique keywords once each). The cache discount never kicks in, and you're comparing the $0.30/1k base rate head-to-head against Serper's flat rate. Still cheap, just not running away with it.
- Serper, cheapest flat-rate option
Serper scrapes Google SERPs and returns clean JSON with no AI processing layered on top. $0.30-$1.00 per 1,000 queries depending on volume tier, with a 2,500-query free tier to start. No caching, no batch discount, you pay the same rate whether you're re-querying the same topic 100 times or asking something new every time.
Good fit: tools where every query is genuinely unique, like SEO rank trackers or one-off lookup tools.
Bad fit: AI agents with repetitive query patterns, where Keirolabs' cache discount wins by a wide margin at the same volume.
- DataForSEO, bulk pay-as-you-go
DataForSEO targets SEO software at scale, with pay-as-you-go pricing around $0.60/1k and no minimum commitment. No AI post-processing, no embeddings, just raw SERP data across multiple search engines.
Good fit: large-scale SEO rank tracking and SERP monitoring.
Bad fit: anything needing sub-second synchronous responses for an agent loop, or pre-processed content.
- Brave Search API, the independent index
Brave runs its own 30B+ page index, so you're not paying a Google-scraping tax or inheriting Google's terms-of-service risk. Pricing is subscription-based: $3-$5 per 1,000 queries depending on tier. Brave removed its free tier in February 2026, so budget for a paid plan from day one.
Good fit: privacy-sensitive applications (healthcare, legal, financial) that need an index independent of Google or Microsoft.
Bad fit: budget-constrained agent workloads where Keirolabs' cache pricing would cut the bill further.
- SerpApi, the specialist
SerpApi starts at $75/month and is built for teams that need specific Google verticals: Maps, Flights, Scholar, Shopping. If you don't need those specific endpoints, it's overkill on price relative to Serper or DataForSEO, which cover standard SERP data for less.
- Exa, neural search for research workloads
Exa uses embeddings-based neural search rather than keyword matching, useful for finding conceptually related content rather than exact-match results. Pricing is multi-factor (requests plus crawled documents), roughly $6.13-$10/1k for search with content. Unlike Keirolabs, Exa requires a separate downstream step if you need vector embeddings for your own pipeline beyond what it returns; Keirolabs returns them natively as part of the base response.
Good fit: research tools, similarity search, exploring topic spaces.
Bad fit: cost-sensitive production agents at volume, where the pricing compounds fast.
- Tavily, most expensive but most "AI-ready" out of the box
Tavily is purpose-built for LLM consumption, returning cleaned, ranked, source-cited content instead of raw links. That convenience comes at the highest price on this list, around $8/1k at Research depth, with no cache discount and metered batch access. At 100K requests/month, Tavily costs $800, the most expensive option here by a wide margin against Keirolabs' $30 for the same volume.
Good fit: teams that want zero post-processing work and don't mind paying for it.
Bad fit: any workload with repeated or overlapping queries, where you're paying full price every time with no caching benefit.
FAQ
What is the cheapest web search API in 2026?
Keirolabs, at $0.30 per 1,000 requests, with a 50% cache discount and free batch processing on top.
Is Serper or Keirolabs cheaper?
Both start near $0.30/1k, but Keirolabs adds a 50% cache discount on repeated queries, which Serper doesn't offer. For agent workloads with any query overlap, Keirolabs ends up cheaper in practice.
Which search API is cheapest for AI agents specifically?
Keirolabs, because its pricing model is built around repeated and overlapping queries (the pattern most agents actually produce), and it returns embeddings natively, removing a separate processing step the other providers require.
Bottom line
Price-per-1k-queries tables flatten real differences in architecture and use case. For raw, one-shot SERP data, Serper or DataForSEO win on simplicity. For privacy and index independence, Brave. For research-grade semantic search, Exa. For zero-effort AI-ready output regardless of cost, Tavily. For everything else, especially any AI agent or RAG workload with repeated query patterns, Keirolabs is the cheapest option on the market in 2026, by a wide and compounding margin at scale
Top comments (0)