If you’re part of a small team, a study group, or an early-stage startup, you may have just discovered something unpleasant: Postman’s Free plan is now limited to a single user.
That means free team collaboration shared collections, shared environments, shared workflows is gone unless you upgrade.
For many developers, this isn’t a minor pricing adjustment. It changes how Postman has been used for years.
Across Reddit, Discords, and dev communities, the same question keeps coming up:
“If Postman isn’t free for teams anymore… what should we use?”
Let’s talk about that.
Why This Change Matters
Postman didn’t just grow because it was powerful.
It grew because it was accessible.
The Free plan became the default choice for:
- Students learning APIs together
- Indie devs building side projects
- Small backend teams prototyping services
- QA testers sharing API test collections
By limiting the Free plan to one user, collaboration is now a paid decision, not a default behavior.
From a SaaS business perspective, this makes sense.
From a developer workflow perspective, it forces teams to reconsider their tooling much earlier than expected.
And unlike a few years ago, there are now solid alternatives.
The API Tooling Landscape Has Matured
For a long time, “API testing tool” essentially meant Postman.
That’s no longer true.
Today, teams choose tools based on workflow philosophy, not just features:
- Lightweight vs structured
- Spec-first vs request-first
- Testing-only vs docs + testing together
Below are five Postman alternatives developers are actively using, depending on what they care about most.
1. Apidog - API Testing and Documentation in One Workflow
Apidog approaches the problem differently.
Instead of treating documentation as something you add later, it combines:
- API specifications
- API documentation
- API testing
into a single workflow.
Teams often choose Apidog when:
- Documentation matters as much as testing
- APIs are shared across teams or stakeholders
- Keeping docs and tests in sync is a priority
This makes it especially appealing for teams that struggled with Postman collections drifting away from actual API behavior.
2. Hoppscotch - Lightweight and Web-Based
Hoppscotch is popular for its speed and accessibility.
It runs in the browser, loads instantly, and is widely used for:
- Quick API testing
- Learning and demos
- Lightweight experimentation
Many developers use Hoppscotch alongside other tools rather than as a full replacement, especially during early development and learning phases.
3. Insomnia - A Clean, Developer-First API Client
Insomnia is often the first tool developers try after Postman.
It focuses on being fast, simple, and pleasant to use without overwhelming the interface.
Teams commonly use Insomnia for:
- REST and GraphQL testing
- Individual or small-team workflows
- Developers who want less UI complexity
If Postman started to feel heavy or cluttered, Insomnia usually feels like a reset.
4. Swagger UI / - OpenAPI-Based Tools Spec-First by Design
Many teams are moving toward spec-first workflows built around OpenAPI.
In these setups:
- The API spec becomes the source of truth
- Testing, docs, and clients are generated from it
Swagger UI and related tools are commonly used when:
- APIs need strong contracts
- Multiple teams depend on the same backend
- Documentation must stay accurate
This approach shifts the mindset from “testing requests” to “designing interfaces.”
5. curl + Scripted Workflows Simple but Powerful
It’s easy to forget, but many teams still rely on:
curl- shell scripts
- small custom tools
especially for automation and CI workflows.
While not beginner-friendly, scripted approaches are:
- Transparent
- Version-controlled
- Free from vendor lock-in
As SaaS tools become more restrictive, some teams are rediscovering the value of simple, script-based testing.
Is Postman Still Worth It?
For larger teams already paying for Postman, the answer is often yes.
It’s still a powerful platform with a large ecosystem.
For students, indie developers, and early-stage teams, the decision is no longer automatic.
The key takeaway isn’t that Postman is “bad.”
It’s that defaults have changed.
Once collaboration moves behind a paywall, teams naturally explore alternatives and many discover tools that fit their workflows better anyway.
A Bigger Lesson About Developer Tools
This situation highlights a broader lesson:
If your core workflow depends on a free SaaS tier staying generous forever, you’re exposed.
More teams are now:
- Choosing spec-first approaches
- Avoiding deep vendor lock-in
- Mixing lightweight tools instead of relying on a single platform
Postman’s change didn’t create this trend it just accelerated it.
Final Thoughts
Postman limiting the Free plan to one user marks the end of an era, but not the end of good API tooling.
Whether you choose:
- Insomnia for simplicity
- Hoppscotch for speed
- Apidog for docs + testing
- OpenAPI-first tools for structure
- Or scripted workflows for control
The important thing is being intentional about your tooling not just following old defaults.
The ecosystem is healthier than it’s ever been.
What are you switching to, and why?
Top comments (6)
This change doesn’t surprise me tbh. Postman has been moving upmarket for a while. The interesting part is how many solid alternatives exist now compared to 3–4 years ago.
This feels like Postman fully committing to enterprise. Free team usage was the main reason it spread so widely.
Yeah, once collaboration is gated, the value drops fast. Especially for small teams.
Good timing! a lot of people are searching for this right now
Postman keeps tightening the free tier, but the ecosystem isn’t what it was years ago. There are real alternatives now. Feels like a risky move.
you can use Voiden as well. Open sourced this week: github.com/VoidenHQ/voiden