In fast-moving projects, it’s tempting to say:
“Let’s save time. Skip the scope, skip the objectives, just start building.”
But here’s the problem:
Skipping clarity at the start guarantees confusion later.
Myth 8: “We can skip defining scope and objectives to save time.”
This shortcut looks efficient.
In reality, it’s a trap.
Without scope and objectives:
- Teams don’t share the same vision
- Features shift midstream
- Stakeholders argue over priorities
- Timelines slip, budgets explode
I’ve seen it first-hand:
👉 A mobile app team thought they could go faster by skipping scope.
Three sprints later, they had to redo half their work because expectations kept changing.
What they tried to save in time, they lost many times over in rework.
The QTAM Difference
The Quick Technical Architecture Method (QTAM) puts clarity first.
- Define scope early — breadth, depth, time, and domains
- Set objectives that fit the scope
- Use them as anchors for every design decision
This protects the team from endless debates and expensive rework.
Why It Matters
Clear scope and objectives mean:
- Alignment from day one
- Predictable delivery
- Less waste
- Happier stakeholders
Skipping them isn’t fast — it’s costly.
Take the Next Step
Don’t pay the price of rushed starts.
👉 Learn how QTAM locks scope and objectives early at qtam.morin.io
Top comments (0)