DEV Community

Vee Satayamas
Vee Satayamas

Posted on

2 1

My Lispy code in Python

I translated my function in Lisp to Python.

def get_the_longest_prefix(a, b, ans):
    if len(a) == 0 or len(b) == 0:
        return "".join(ans)
    if a[0] == b[0]:
        return get_the_longest_prefix(a[1:], b[1:], ans + [a[0]])
    if a[0] == '-':
        return get_the_longest_prefix(a[1:], b, ans + ['-'])
    if b[0] == '-':
        return get_the_longest_prefix(a, b[1:], ans + ['-'])
    return "".join(ans)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

And it has too many "return" statements. Anyway, I suppose Python doesn’t prefer a recursion. So this isn’t the case when we code in the Python way.

The code above concatenate Python's lists instead of creating a linked list like in Lisp.

So I made this experiment.

import time

n = 100

# Concatinating vectors
v = []
t1 = time.time_ns()
for i in range(n):
    v = [i] + v
t2 = time.time_ns()

# Creating cons cells for a singly link list
l = None
t3 = time.time_ns()
for i in range(n):
    l = (i, l) # Creating a cons cell
t4 = time.time_ns()

print((t2-t1)/(t4-t3))
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

At n = 100, concatenating vectors require 2 times of running time compared to creating cons cells for a linked list. So I keep using linked lists.

Image of Docusign

🛠️ Bring your solution into Docusign. Reach over 1.6M customers.

Docusign is now extensible. Overcome challenges with disconnected products and inaccessible data by bringing your solutions into Docusign and publishing to 1.6M customers in the App Center.

Learn more

Top comments (0)

A Workflow Copilot. Tailored to You.

Pieces.app image

Our desktop app, with its intelligent copilot, streamlines coding by generating snippets, extracting code from screenshots, and accelerating problem-solving.

Read the docs