"Two tools. Same goal. Totally different vibes."
If you're diving into Infrastructure as Code (IaC) on AWS, chances are you've run into this question:
Should I use Terraform or CloudFormation?
Itβs like choosing between Batman and Iron Man β both are powerful, but which one fits your mission?
In this post, weβll break down Terraform and CloudFormation in plain English, using relatable metaphors, practical examples, and decision-ready insights.
Letβs settle this IaC showdown. π₯
π§± What is Infrastructure as Code (IaC)?
IaC lets you manage your cloud resources like software.
- No more clicking around the AWS Console
- Your infrastructure is version-controlled and repeatable
- You write code β Apply β Boom! Your infra is deployed
Think of IaC like using a recipe instead of cooking from memory. Reliable, shareable, and way less stressful.
π€ Meet the Contenders
Terraform (by HashiCorp)
- Open-source, multi-cloud IaC tool
- Uses its own language: HCL (HashiCorp Configuration Language)
- Not limited to AWS (also supports Azure, GCP, etc.)
CloudFormation (by AWS)
- Native AWS IaC service
- Uses JSON or YAML
- Fully integrated into the AWS ecosystem
π¦ Side-by-Side Breakdown
Feature | Terraform | CloudFormation |
---|---|---|
Language | HCL (readable) | JSON/YAML |
Multi-cloud? | β Yes | β AWS only |
Modularity | β Excellent with modules | π Limited with nested stacks |
State Management | β External state file (local/S3/remote) | β Managed by AWS |
Change Preview | β
terraform plan
|
β Change sets (less intuitive) |
Community | π§‘ Huge open-source ecosystem | π§‘ Strong AWS-native support |
Learning Curve | π’ Beginner-friendly | π Slightly verbose |
Speed | π Fast | π’ Slower on large stacks |
Third-Party Resources | β Supported (via providers) | β AWS only |
π§ Real-World Analogy
Terraform = Universal Remote
You can control any TV β AWS, Azure, GCP, even on-prem β with one tool.
CloudFormation = Official TV Remote
Built for AWS, works perfectly, but only on that TV.
π οΈ Code Examples
Terraform Example (EC2 Instance)
provider "aws" {
region = "us-east-1"
}
resource "aws_instance" "my_ec2" {
ami = "ami-0abcdef1234567890"
instance_type = "t2.micro"
}
CloudFormation Example (EC2 Instance)
Resources:
MyEC2Instance:
Type: AWS::EC2::Instance
Properties:
ImageId: ami-0abcdef1234567890
InstanceType: t2.micro
TL;DR: Terraform feels more like coding. CloudFormation feels more like configuration.
π‘ When to Choose What?
β Choose Terraform if:
- You need multi-cloud deployments
- You want modular, DRY code
- You value a large community and plugin support
- You like
terraform plan
(preview before applying)
β Choose CloudFormation if:
- You're 100% on AWS and want native integration
- You prefer AWS-native tools (e.g., use AWS CDK with CFN)
- You like the idea of no external state files
- You want tight IAM integration and CloudWatch hooks
π₯ Pro Tips
- Use Terraform for orchestration, CloudFormation for fine-tuned AWS setup
- Consider AWS CDK if you love TypeScript/Python + CloudFormation
- Store Terraform state in S3 + DynamoDB for team-safe usage
- Use CI/CD pipelines to deploy IaC changes automatically
π§ TL;DR
Use Case | Best Tool |
---|---|
Multi-cloud deployments | Terraform |
All-in on AWS | CloudFormation |
Faster iteration | Terraform |
Deep AWS integrations | CloudFormation |
Large team collaboration | Terraform (with remote state) |
π¬ Whatβs YOUR IaC Tool of Choice?
Terraform vs. CloudFormation is a classic debate β and your use case is the real decider.
π Drop your favorite tool and why you love it in the comments.
Smash β€οΈ if this cleared things up, and share it with a dev friend who's lost in IaC land.
Letβs build cloud infra the smart way β one line of code at a time. π§‘
Top comments (0)