I ran a query against my activity log today.
npx cc-review-queue --all
Output:
๐ AI Review Queue โ all time
59 files pending review ยท 274 edits ยท +11,424/-200 lines
1. 2026-02-28 21:55 [EDIT ] ~/bin/algora-watch
+169 (2x)
2. 2026-02-28 18:00 [EDIT ] ~/.claude/hooks/task-complete-nudge.sh
-1
3. 2026-02-28 17:49 [WRITE] ~/bin/task-check
+87
...
59 files. 274 edits. Some of them hooks. Some of them scripts in ~/bin/. Some of them Claude Code's own configuration files.
I knew the AI was busy. I didn't know it was that busy.
Why this matters
Claude Code's activity-logger.sh hook logs every file operation it makes. When an edit touches a sensitive path โ hooks directory, bin scripts, configuration files โ it marks the entry needs_review: true.
The point is: a human should look at these before the next session runs.
In practice, nobody was looking. The flag was being set; nobody was checking the flag.
cc-review-queue is the tool that surfaces those files.
What it reads
The tool reads ~/ops/activity-log.jsonl โ the file that Claude Code's activity-logger hook writes to after every Edit/Write operation.
Each entry looks like this:
{"ts":"2026-02-28T02:23:00Z","actor":"CC","tool":"Write","path":"/home/user/.claude/hooks/session-start-marker.sh","add":33,"del":0,"needs_review":true}
cc-review-queue filters for needs_review: true, groups by file path, sums up all the adds/deletes for that file, and sorts by most recently touched.
The output
Three modes:
# Last 30 days (default)
npx cc-review-queue
# Last 7 days
npx cc-review-queue --days=7
# Markdown โ for reports, Slack, PR descriptions
npx cc-review-queue --format=md
Markdown output:
# AI Review Queue
Period: last 7 days ยท 23 files ยท 63 edits ยท +2932 / -65 lines
| # | Last Edit | Tool | File | Changes | Edits |
|---|-----------|------|------|---------|-------|
| 1 | 2026-02-28 21:55 | Edit | `~/bin/algora-watch` | +169 | 2x |
| 2 | 2026-02-28 18:00 | Edit | `~/.claude/hooks/task-complete-nudge.sh` | +19 / -1 | 2x |
...
The 2x, 3x counters show how many times the AI touched the same file. A file that was edited 19 times in the same period probably needs more than a quick look.
The hook that creates this data
cc-review-queue only works if you have activity-logger.sh running. It's part of claude-code-hooks โ a collection of 16 production hooks for autonomous Claude Code.
The activity logger is a PostToolUse hook that fires after every Edit or Write operation:
{
"hooks": {
"PostToolUse": [
{
"matcher": "Edit|Write",
"hooks": [{ "type": "command", "command": "~/.claude/hooks/activity-logger.sh" }]
}
]
}
}
The logger decides needs_review based on path patterns (configurable):
# Paths that trigger needs_review: true
MONITORED_PATHS=(
"$HOME/.claude/"
"$HOME/bin/"
"$HOME/.bashrc"
"$HOME/.zshrc"
)
What I found in my queue
My top needs_review files by edit count:
-
~/bin/cc-loopโ edited 29 times -
~/bin/devto-publishโ edited 17 times -
~/bin/tweet-postโ edited 19 times -
~/.claude/hooks/proof-log-session.shโ edited 6 times
The AI kept improving its own tooling. That's the interesting part.
None of these changes caused problems. But that's because I was reviewing them (eventually). The queue just makes the reviewing systematic instead of accidental.
Part of cc-toolkit
cc-review-queue is part of cc-toolkit โ all free, zero dependencies, local.
The full oversight picture:
| Tool | What it shows |
|---|---|
| cc-review-queue | Files AI touched that need review |
| cc-session-stats | Total hours, sessions, autonomy ratio |
| cc-ai-heatmap | 52-week activity visualization |
| cc-standup | Daily standup from AI's work log |
Is your Claude Code setup actually safe? Run npx cc-health-check โ a free 20-point diagnostic. Score below 80? The Claude Code Ops Kit fixes everything in one command.
npx cc-review-queue --days=7
If you're running Claude Code autonomously and not using this โ check how many files are in your queue first.
Top comments (0)