If you're an engineer who's been handed the job of picking (or defending) your team's tracker, here's the version of this decision that skips the sales pages. Linear is the one most of us actually enjoy using day to day — keyboard-first, cycles instead of mushy sprints, 250 free issues and two teams before you pay anything, then about $10/seat/month (Basic) or $16/seat/month (Business) once you outgrow that. It does almost nothing for non-engineers, which is either a feature or a dealbreaker depending on your org chart.
Jira is the tool you end up on anyway once a PMO, a client success team, or a compliance function needs cross-project reporting — Standard runs about $7.91/user/month, Premium about $14.54/user/month, and Premium is where Advanced Roadmaps and a 99.9% uptime SLA kick in. Azure DevOps is worth a hard look only if your team is already paying for Visual Studio or running GitHub Enterprise through Entra ID — the Basic plan's first five seats are free, then roughly $6/seat/month, and it comes with Repos and a baseline amount of Pipelines bundled in, which can genuinely undercut Jira if you're already in that ecosystem. Notion is the dark horse: not built as a tracker, but its database views cover basic kanban needs well enough that a lot of 10–20 person teams run on Plus ($10/member/month) or Business ($20/member/month) for docs and lightweight tracking combined, until sprint reporting outgrows it. Treat those numbers as list prices at the time of writing, not quotes: check each vendor's pricing page before you budget, because tiers change and annual contracts above 20–25 seats are usually negotiable.
The actual engineering decision isn't which tool is "best" — none of them are universally best — it's whether your team's reporting and process needs match what each tool assumes by default. We wrote up the full cost and decision breakdown, including a 20-person team cost table in INR, here: Software Project Management Tools for Indian Tech Teams in 2026.
Top comments (0)