Crunchbase API: The Free Tier Is Dead
If you’re a developer who used Crunchbase’s free API tier for startup research, funding data, or market analysis — it’s gone. As of 2025, Crunchbase eliminated free API access entirely. The cheapest plan now starts at $49/month (Basic), with the full-featured API requiring the Pro plan at $99/month.
For indie developers, researchers, and early-stage startups who need startup ecosystem data, this pricing change fundamentally changes the equation.
Crunchbase API Pricing in 2026
| Plan | Price | API Access | Daily Limit | Data Available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free |
|
No | — | — |
| Basic | $49/mo | Limited | 200 calls/min | Basic company data |
| Pro | $99/mo | Full | 200 calls/min | Full dataset + exports |
| Enterprise | Custom | Full | Custom | Everything + support |
What $49/Month Gets You
import requests
CB_API_KEY = "your_api_key_here"
def search_companies(query, limit=25):
url = "https://api.crunchbase.com/api/v4/searches/organizations"
headers = {"X-cb-user-key": CB_API_KEY}
payload = {
"field_ids": ["identifier", "short_description", "funding_total",
"num_funding_rounds", "founded_on"],
"query": [{"type": "predicate",
"field_id": "identifier",
"operator_id": "contains",
"values": [query]}],
"limit": limit
}
resp = requests.post(url, json=payload, headers=headers)
return resp.json()
results = search_companies("ai agent")
for entity in results.get("entities", []):
props = entity["properties"]
funding = props.get("funding_total", {}).get("value_usd", 0)
print(f"{props['identifier']['value']} — ${funding:,.0f} raised")
The data quality is excellent. But $588-$1,188/year is a hard sell for individual developers or side projects.
What You Lose Without Crunchbase API
Crunchbase’s dataset is uniquely valuable:
- Funding rounds — who invested, how much, what stage
- Company profiles — founding date, team size, location, categories
- Acquisition data — who bought whom and for how much
- People data — founders, executives, board members
- Market maps — companies by category and geography
No other single source combines all of this. But paying $49+/month for a data project that may or may not produce value? That’s a tough startup cost.
The Web Scraping Alternative
Crunchbase’s company profiles are publicly accessible on the web. The data displayed on their website is the same data behind the API:
import requests
from bs4 import BeautifulSoup
def get_crunchbase_company(company_slug):
url = f"https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/{company_slug}"
headers = {
"User-Agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36"
}
resp = requests.get(url, headers=headers)
soup = BeautifulSoup(resp.text, "html.parser")
# Note: Crunchbase heavily uses JavaScript rendering
# Basic requests won’t get much — you need browser automation
title = soup.select_one("h1")
return {
"name": title.text.strip() if title else None,
"url": url
}
The challenge: Crunchbase is a React single-page application. Most data loads dynamically via JavaScript, which means simple HTTP requests won’t work. You need:
- Headless browser — Playwright or Puppeteer to render JavaScript
- Proxy rotation — Crunchbase blocks datacenter IPs quickly
- Anti-detection — fingerprint management, human-like behavior
- Rate management — respectful pacing to avoid blocks
API vs Scraping: Side-by-Side
| Feature | Crunchbase API ($49+/mo) | Web Scraping |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | $49-99/month | Infrastructure only |
| Access barrier | Credit card required | None |
| Data format | Clean JSON | Requires parsing |
| Company profiles | Full | Public data |
| Funding data | Detailed | As displayed |
| People/team data | Yes | Public profiles |
| Historical data | Full history | Limited to current |
| Bulk export | Pro plan only ($99/mo) | Unlimited |
| Rate limits | 200 calls/min | Self-managed |
| Setup complexity | Low (API keys) | High (browser automation) |
Scaling Crunchbase Data Collection
For production use, building Crunchbase scraping infrastructure from scratch is complex. The SPA rendering, anti-bot measures, and data structure changes require ongoing maintenance.
Managed scraping tools like this Crunchbase scraper on Apify handle the browser automation and proxy management:
from apify_client import ApifyClient
client = ApifyClient("YOUR_API_TOKEN")
run = client.actor("cryptosignals/crunchbase-scraper").call(
run_input={
"searchQuery": "artificial intelligence",
"location": "San Francisco",
"fundingStage": "Series A",
"maxResults": 200
}
)
for company in client.dataset(run["defaultDatasetId"]).iterate_items():
funding = company.get("totalFunding", 0)
print(f"{company['name']} — ${funding:,.0f} — {company.get('category')}")
Alternative Data Sources for Startup Research
If neither the API nor scraping fits your needs, consider these alternatives:
| Source | Cost | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|
| PitchBook | Enterprise ($$$) | Most comprehensive | Expensive |
| Dealroom | Free tier available | EU/startup focus | Limited US data |
| OpenVC | Free | VC-focused | Smaller dataset |
| Tracxn | Free tier available | Good coverage | Limited free access |
| Free (limited) | People data strong | No funding data | |
| AngelList/Wellfound | Free | Startup jobs + data | Limited API |
The Cost Comparison
Let’s do the math for a typical startup research project:
Crunchbase API (1 year):
Basic: $49 x 12 = $588/year
Pro: $99 x 12 = $1,188/year
Web scraping (Apify, typical usage):
Pay-per-result: ~$5-20/month for moderate use
Annual: $60-240/year
Savings: 60-90% depending on usage
The API wins on convenience and data structure. Scraping wins on cost and flexibility.
When to Use What
Use the Crunchbase API if:
- You have budget and need clean, reliable data
- You’re building a product where Crunchbase data is core
- You need historical funding data going back years
- You want zero maintenance overhead
Use web scraping if:
- You’re exploring and don’t want to commit $49+/month
- You need bulk data beyond API rate limits
- You’re combining data from multiple sources
- You need flexibility the API doesn’t offer
The Bottom Line
Crunchbase’s decision to remove the free tier makes business sense — their data is genuinely valuable and they’re entitled to charge for it. But it also means the barrier to entry for startup data access has gone from $0 to $588/year overnight.
For developers and researchers who need startup ecosystem data without the subscription commitment, web scraping provides a cost-effective alternative. The key is choosing the right approach for your specific use case and budget.
How do you source startup and funding data? Found a good Crunchbase alternative? Let me know in the comments.
Top comments (2)
Scraping comparisons should weigh terms of service, privacy, and data freshness. Lower infrastructure cost can hide compliance and maintenance risk.
Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.