🧨 The UX Problem No One Wanted to Touch
For years, the crypto industry pretended that:
“security = friction”,
“wallet UX doesn't matter”,
and “people will learn gas fees eventually”.
They didn’t.
And while the backend of crypto kept evolving (zk, rollups, AA wallets), the UX stayed stuck — until recently.
✨ Web3 Is Copying the Right Things
The new trend?
Copy from fintech. Shamelessly. Because they got it right.
Features that used to be impossible in crypto are now being built:
Sending funds using nicknames instead of wallet addresses;
No-code loyalty layers for apps;
Custody APIs that work like Stripe;
In-app chats and history for transactions;
Mobile-native money transfers — like shaking your phone to send funds.
One platform that did this?
WhiteBIT, who added:
QuickSend — lets users transfer crypto using only nicknames;
Shake-to-Send — a proximity-based feature that mimics Venmo-style payments via phones.
And for once, this is not “social crypto” — it’s actually usable.
🤝 Why This Matters for Builders
If you’re building anything in Web3 — even if it’s B2B — you should be paying attention to:
Frictionless P2P UX
(because your users will compare you to fintech apps, not wallets)
Messaging-first UI for transactions
(think “WhatsApp + USDT” instead of “Metamask + etherscan”)
Proximity tech like BLE and secure QR
(Shake-to-Send is not a gimmick — it’s UX relevance)
Your app doesn’t need to reinvent payments.
It just needs to feel native to users who grew up with Revolut, Cash App, and Apple Pay.
🧩 What’s Coming Next
The next wave of crypto adoption won’t be about yield, staking, or NFTs.
It’ll be about making crypto invisible inside flows that feel like messaging.
Think: “Send $5 to Sarah” - not “create a 0xABC... transaction”.
đź’¬ In Final Thought
Crypto doesn’t need to be simple.
It needs to be familiar.
And that’s where features like QuickSend and Shake-to-Send push the industry forward.
They don’t solve every problem — but they finally give UX a seat at the protocol table.
📣 Want a deeper breakdown of how we could build this in a dApp context? Let me know — I’m happy to write a follow-up.
Top comments (0)