DEV Community

Cover image for Mobile App Fraud Prevention in 2025: Hard Numbers, Real Lessons
Olga Gubanova
Olga Gubanova

Posted on

Mobile App Fraud Prevention in 2025: Hard Numbers, Real Lessons

Nobody thinks they’ll get hit — until it happens. In 2025, app fraud isn’t hype; it’s what you see when your logs light up at 3 a.m. and someone’s draining your wallet for real.

Some recent facts and examples

Bybit lost $1.5B (Feb 2025)

Not a “genius hack,” just skipping device and MFA checks for big withdrawals.

Result: instant outflow, forced audits, regulatory headaches.

  • $12.5B in user losses last year (FTC): Attackers target mobile first, especially fintech and marketplaces.
  • Regulatory fines are real: I’ve seen fintech and medtech projects pay $40K–$200K because a single unsecured API leaked user data. Usually the leak was something basic: a forgotten auth check, a verbose log.

What we've learned works (and what didn't)

1. MFA for transactions

  • For Flutter: otp_text_field. For Node: speakeasy.
  • SMS codes are getting owned by SIM swap attacks; push notifications are safer (Authy, Firebase).
  • Once tried disabling MFA for “trusted devices.” That ended with cookie-based account takeovers and a painful rollback.

2. Device fingerprinting

  • Used SEON (super fast start, analytics limited) and FingerprintJS (more options, more setup).
  • FingerprintJS caught bot logins coming from shared IP pools that IP-based geo checks missed.

3. Risk scoring on sessions

  • Ravelin — easy API, works well for commerce and subscription apps.
  • False positives under 2%. No angry emails about login issues.

4. Manual review and event logging

  • Automation catches most things, but we still flag high-risk transactions for human review.
  • Having a good event dashboard is critical: twice, our support team stopped fraud in progress just by reacting to strange login clusters.

Where we wasted time and money

  • Building everything from scratch: We tried this. Four months in, SDKs still won: regulatory updates are non-stop, fraudsters bypass naive logic fast.
  • Relying on open source only: Good for MVP, but slow bug fixes and outdated docs made it risky for production. Updates lagged behind new attack methods.

What actually works for most teams:

  • Start with a proven SDK; build your custom logic around it.
  • Invest in solid logging and automated alerts.
  • Focus your time on flows unique to your app, not re-inventing security wheels.

Main takeaways

  • Fraud prevention is a process, not a checkbox. You’ll always be adapting.
  • Don’t compromise on core security. You can trim UI/UX, but never shortcuts around money flows.
  • Open source can help you learn, but don’t bet your app’s survival on it alone.
  • Know your own risks: how many transactions, what’s the cost of a breach, which regulator will come knocking first?

Want a quick cost estimate? Try this free calculator:

👉 App Security & Fraud Prevention Calculator

Full breakdown of SDKs, costs, and playbooks here:

👉 Mobile App Fraud Prevention Cost in 2025

Would love to hear what’s actually worked for you (or what totally failed). Drop your stories or tools in the comments — I always learn something from this crowd.

Top comments (1)

Collapse
 
avies profile image
avies • Edited

We had a scare last year when a simple logging misconfiguration exposed session tokens. Ever since, security has been a core part of every sprint. One thing that helped was integrating a white-labeled financing solution kindgeek.com/white_label_pfm_platform with built-in fraud prevention layers. Not only did it save us time, but it also reduced our exposure to known attack vectors. Prevention is a mindset, not a feature.