DEV Community

Cover image for How has your relationship with complexity changed over time?
Ben Halpern
Ben Halpern Subscriber

Posted on

How has your relationship with complexity changed over time?

How do you deal with, avoid, or accept complexity β€” differently than you might have earlier in your career?

Latest comments (31)

Collapse
 
dwoodwardgb profile image
David Woodward

As long as the unit tests are readable, I give up caring about the code readability

Collapse
 
kspeakman profile image
Kasey Speakman

Complexity is reserved for business logic. Complication is acceptable for technical concerns.

Collapse
 
youpiwaza profile image
max

When I was younger, I tended to avoid complexity, or always tried to go on it with some support (either colleague or internet).

But now with some more experience, I'll always deal it the same way with ~3steps :

  1. Always have a clear vision of what your are doing : always prepare, don't write a single line of code before having complete comments describing what you are doing.
  2. A complex thing is always the sum of multiples simple things. Just cut the big log in small pieces and it will be fine
  3. Refactoring. Again, before coding, try to spot any design pattern that could improve and simplify your algorithm.

I recommand having a look at "refactoring guru", the website with the badger mascot, as it explains a lot of it, with detailed examples both theoric and with code.


Some more advices :

  • If you find yourself in trouble, go try the MVC design pattern, and try to define wich part of your code goes where
  • If you are in trouble with the algorithm, make a flowchart, or several, until all cases are noted. It really helps making patterns pop to the eye
  • Try to regroup stuff by entities. All the client stuff goes in "Client", all the navigation stuff goes in "Navigation", and so on. It can help to create Classes, if you yo the Object way. Also if it's an info, it will be a property (you just store something). If it does something, or transform something, it's a method. As simple as that.
  • Naming is reaaaally important.

Maybe the best advice I can give is that it will never be flawless the first time, and don't try to make 10+ classes for a start.

Most of the time I do a big old "index.php" or "script.js", code on the fly, and when things are finally starting running flawlessly, and your file is 500+ lines : it's a hint that it is time to split your code into multiple folders/files.

Got client stuff ? Create a "Client" classe.

Need to create a new client ? Create "Client->create( )" method

Client needs name and email ? Update your class : name & email properties. "Client->create(name, email)"

And so on.

Once you feel good and confortable about this, to get to the next level go check Unit Testing, and after that TDD > Test Driven Development.

It will help you thinking about your code as input/outputs and stuff, and can really improve code reliability, maintenance, avoid regression, and also make your code really faster.


Sorry for the big block and the approximate english.
Feel free to ask questions if you have some ;)

Have a nice day

Collapse
 
davidmontoyago profile image
David Montoya

I've learned to manage it. I do so by using abstractions and "Bounded Contexts" that closely represent the business domain. If a certain abstraction is too complex to maintain, "grok" or reason about, I "encapsulate it" and defer all its complexity to a consumable contract. This often applies to classes, modules, libraries as well as feature teams! I wish I'd had learned this "domain-focused" approach much earlier in my career. It would have made me more effective at maintaining codebases and designing larger systems.

Collapse
 
mfurmaniuk profile image
Michael

I have personally become more complex as I age, my code less so.
Turning to have Code as documentation has allowed me to not only simplify it, but make methods and steps easier to understand with good naming.

Collapse
 
yawaramin profile image
Yawar Amin

I see complexity arise when people try to fit square pegs in round holes, use tools for purposes they were not intended for and for which they are mismatched. I think complexity can be reduced by 'going with the grain' of tools we use rather than against. Have written more thoughts here: dev.to/yawaramin/reducing-system-c...

Collapse
 
mcsee profile image
Maxi Contieri

Complexity is always accidental.
We need to avoid it all the time.

Forget about code complexity and software complexity. they are a myth

Collapse
 
mellen profile image
Matt Ellen-Tsivintzeli

It's...

Complicated.

Collapse
 
jaakidup profile image
Jaaki • Edited

I've always strived for simplicity, as it is beautiful to look at and to work with. And it works.

I find that inexperienced developers often overcomplicate simple things. I've made peace with that as everyone needs to learn sometime. It is frustrating though to look at a project, codebase or architecture that is 10x times more bloated and convoluted than it should be.

Collapse
 
highcenburg profile image
Vicente G. Reyes

Will never forget this from one of the authors here at dev: