Conversational Development With Claude Code — Part 17: Integrating Claude Code into GitHub Pull Requests
TL;DR — When Claude Code lives inside your Pull Requests, review stops being a ritual and becomes a dialogue. In this chapter, we transform a simple README change into a fully automated review cycle powered by GitHub Actions, conversational triggers, and terminal-driven resolution — without opening an editor.
This is not about AI reviewing code.
This is about engineering feedback loops becoming programmable.
The Pull Request as a Conversation Boundary
A pull request is not just a diff.
It is a contractual proposal:
- A branch declares intent.
- A commit records reasoning.
- A PR exposes change for scrutiny.
When Claude Code is integrated via GitHub Actions, that scrutiny becomes automated — and conversational.
Instead of waiting for human reviewers to notice inconsistencies, Claude executes a structured review the moment the PR is created. It analyzes context, compares patterns, and evaluates risk — all within your repository’s architectural constraints.
Automation does not replace review.
It accelerates its first draft.
Step 1 — Create a Minimal, Controlled Change
We modify a single file: the backend README.md.
Add one line:
"This is an example for a pull request."
Avoid touching unrelated files. Precision matters.
Step 2 — Branch Discipline
git checkout -b feat-claude-code-usage
git status
# modify README
git add backend/README.md
git commit -m "A simple modification to README file"
git push
Branch naming encodes intent.
A clear branch name allows Claude (and humans) to reason about scope without ambiguity.
Step 3 — Opening the Pull Request
Opening the PR triggers:
- The Claude Code GitHub Action workflow.
- Comment-based invocation (@claude).
- Automated structural analysis of the diff.
The app already holds read/write permissions over pull requests.
What Happens Behind the Scenes?
The GitHub Action:
- Checks out the repository.
- Loads the PR context.
- Passes the diff to Claude Code.
- Generates structured review feedback.
Claude analyzes:
- Code smell
- Security risks
- Architectural inconsistencies
- Violations of standards defined in CLAUDE.md
The review appears directly in the PR as an actionable summary.
Step 4 — Conversational Invocation Inside the PR
Inside PR comments:
@claude explain the changes in this branch
Claude acknowledges the trigger and launches a workflow job.
The pull request becomes an interactive analysis surface.
Step 5 — Bringing Feedback to the Terminal
Inside Claude Code:
pr comments
This retrieves review suggestions and requested clarifications.
You can instruct Claude to apply corrections directly from the terminal.
Feedback resolution becomes a command.
Real Scenario: Closing the Loop
- Create branch feat/claude-code-usage.
- Ask Claude to extend README with integration documentation.
- Commit changes.
- Open PR.
- Claude Review detects formatting issues.
- Pass suggestions back to Claude in the terminal.
- Claude applies corrections.
- Push fixes.
- Claude Review approves.
No IDE required.
Skills Applied
- Git branch strategy
- Pull request workflow
- GitHub Actions automation
- Secure secrets management
- Comment-triggered automation
- CLI-based repository interaction
- Automated code review
Claude amplifies engineering discipline.
Final Reflection
A pull request used to be static.
Now it is interactive.
By embedding Claude Code into GitHub Actions and enabling invocation through comments and CLI workflows, you collapse the distance between writing, reviewing, and correcting code.
You orchestrate intelligence inside version control.
— Written by Cristian Sifuentes
Top comments (0)