Git Secrets, Push Protection, and Real-World Recovery: An Expert Walkthrough
What happens when Git meets enterprise-grade protection? Let's walk through a real and professional workflow.
The Real-World Scenario
You're organizing your Azure CLI automation scripts across services:
vms/comandos.sh
azureIaaS/IassArchitecture.sh
rbac/comandos.sh
zeroTrust/comandos.sh
You're working on the main
branch, making a batch commit that introduces 15 files and over 290 insertions. Everything looks great:
git commit -m "Add commands"
Then you push:
git push origin main
🚨 And GitHub blocks your push:
GH013: Repository rule violations — Push cannot contain secrets
What Went Wrong?
The push was rejected because GitHub's Push Protection detected an Azure Active Directory Application Secret inside rbac/comandos.sh
.
GitHub detected:
- Path:
rbac/comandos.sh:20
- Commit:
b1bce378ff35bc5...
This is a serious matter: the commit history now includes a potential secret that may compromise cloud resources if leaked.
Recovery Strategy (Step-by-Step)
Step 1: Prevent Further Exposure
Immediately notify your team and rotate the leaked secret in Azure.
Step 2: Remove the Secret from Git History
You cannot simply delete the file and recommit—it exists in Git history. Instead, use filtering:
git filter-repo --path rbac/comandos.sh --invert-paths
Or for a more targeted removal:
git rebase -i HEAD~5
# Remove or edit the offending commit
Alternatively, use BFG Repo Cleaner:
bfg --delete-files rbac/comandos.sh
Step 3: Force Push Cleaned History
Once the secret is removed from history:
git push origin main --force
✅ GitHub will now allow your push.
Advanced Git Techniques Explained
1. Why filter-repo
over rebase
?
Rewriting deep history is easier with filter-repo
(or bfg
). Interactive rebase is effective for recent commits but can be cumbersome for large repos.
2. How Push Protection Works
GitHub checks commits for credential patterns and blocks pushes before they enter the remote repository. This helps prevent security leaks.
Best Practices: Git Security and Secrets
Practice | Why It Matters |
---|---|
Use .env files + .gitignore
|
Keeps secrets out of tracked files |
Enable Push Protection | Blocks secrets before they hit GitHub |
Use GitHub Actions Secrets | Secure storage for workflow credentials |
Rotate secrets regularly | Prevent exposure from forgotten history |
Avoid committing from main
|
Safer development via feature/* branches |
Bonus: Protecting Future Commits
Add a Pre-Commit Hook
#!/bin/sh
grep -r --exclude-dir=".git" -E "(AKIA|AIza|secret|password|client_secret)" . && echo "🚫 Possible secret found!" && exit 1
Save it as .git/hooks/pre-commit
and make it executable:
chmod +x .git/hooks/pre-commit
Key Takeaways
- GitHub Push Protection is critical for secret safety—but requires proactive development hygiene.
- Rewriting Git history is a professional responsibility when secrets are leaked.
- filter-repo, BFG, and rebase -i are essential tools in a Git expert's toolbox.
- Prevent future mistakes with
.gitignore
, environment files, and secure workflows. - Git is not just version control—it’s a safety net, audit trail, and accountability system.
Closing Thought
In modern development, version control isn’t just about code—it's about security, integrity, and responsibility. GitHub Flow + Push Protection is a powerful combo when used thoughtfully.
Become the kind of engineer who merges features with clarity—and secures secrets with confidence.
Follow for more Git mastery, DevOps insights, and cloud engineering best practices.
✍️ Written by: Cristian Sifuentes – Full-stack dev crafting scalable apps with [NET - Azure], [Angular - React], Git, SQL & extensions. Clean code, dark themes, atomic commits
Top comments (0)